November 29, 2005

The Contract-Gate Betting Pool

Trump Image.JPGIn the past DCist has speculated on who might run for mayor. Now that the mayoral lineup has shaped up, we've got greener pastures to move on to. And given that the new biggest story in District politics is the emerging scandal of the $425 million in unauthorized payments and no-bid contracts (we're going to jump the gun here and designate it "Contract-gate"), we figure it's high time to start guessing who might face firing, who might up and resign, and who, if anyone, might face criminal charges.

Last night at a mayoral forum council chair Linda Cropp announced that she had requested a full investigation by D.C. Auditor Deborah K. Nichols, while Rep. Tom Davis (R-Va.) similarly announced he would ask the Government Accounting Office to look into the allegations. Council-member Vincent Orange (D-Ward 5), chairman of the council's Committee on Government Operations, has announced that he will hold hearings on the matter, during which he will surely make a point to go after officials of every level. It's only a matter of time until the pink slips, letters of resignation, or indictments start coming down.

Even if the hearings and investigations reveal no explicit wrong-doing more than grotesque incompetence, someone will have to go. Since so much in politics is perception, D.C. Mayor Anthony Williams may have to stem his administration's bleeding by dismissing certain employees linked to the scandal. The question is, who?

Below, our best guesses.

Fired
2005_0512_Natwar Gandhi.JPGNatwar Gandhi: Gandhi, the city's Chief Financial Officer, is the top of the pecking order on this one. His is the office charged with overseeing the city's finances. Essentially, the buck stops with him, and given that he's already walking wounded from having under-estimated how much the city would need to spend to acquire the land for the stadium, he's our best pick for the first to be fired. His comments to the Post, which ranged from quasi-apology to shameless defense, haven't helped his case much. When quoted as saying, "I will be damned if a child is without textbooks or an AIDS patient is without medicine just because some bureaucrat did not file the paperwork right," Gandhi expresses a profound misunderstanding of what exactly is being charged. His office's creative contracting may well have gotten that child their textbook and that AIDS patient their medication, but considering that the no-bid contracts in question cost the city at least $50 million more than it should have paid for the services rendered (and let's be clear -- not all those contracts went to provide much-needed social services), there aren't going to be a lot of sympathetic ears out there.

2005_0607_Robert Bobb.JPGRobert Bobb: Technically, Bobb, the city administrator, is above Gandhi, but he may be shielded by the fact that his daily work does not involve the minutiae of contracts and procurement. Nonetheless, D.C. Auditor Deborah K. Nichols has already gone after Bobb for playing fast and loose with contracting regulations, so a good guess is that he either endorsed the practices as reported by the Post or did nothing to stop them. Bobb may very well be the high-level fire Williams needs to take pressure off of himself.

Suzanne Peck: The District's Chief Technology Officer seemed particular un-repentant about her role in the contracting scandal, which included 146 no-bid contracts worth $13 million to a consulting firm run by a former employee of Peck's office. The Post noted that Peck "bristles at the constraints of government purchasing," and has encouraged employees to "exploit the hell out of the gray area" when it comes to procurement and contracts. Her disdain for those constraints led the D.C. Inspector General to find that Peck's no-bid contracts had led her agency to overpay contractors by 24 percent on average, a practice Peck has defended as allowing for efficiency and quality in the product required. This woman has all but written out a confession. She'll be fired.

Resign
Anthony F. Pompa: Pompa, head of accounting for Gandhi, made a grave mistake in not noticing the pattern of illegal spending that the Post reported on. The only thing that might save Pompa from outright dismissal is that he was the first official to admit wrong-doing (he was quoted as saying, "We screwed up. We shouldn't do those things. We're going to clean it up."), something that might gain him some sympathy points from District government watchdogs. Regardless, simply admitting error isn't enough to save one's job, especially when this much money is at stake. Pompa is damaged goods, and he would do best in stepping aside quickly.

Herbert R. Tillery: The only thing that might save Tillery, a deputy mayor in charge of contracts and procurement, is that he hasn't been on the job that long and he is by far the most blissfully ignorant of all the officials involved. In the Post's original article, Tillery scoffed at the idea that that much money had been spent illegally, childishly assuming that if that were the case, someone would already be in jail for it. When shown the documents by the Post's reporter, the only thing Tillery could do was turn to his staff and ask how such a failure of oversight was possible. An official this unaware should consider a change of career.

Criminal Charges
Jail Cell.JPGHonestly, we're not lawyers, so we'll stay quiet on this front for now. We're guessing that if any one official knowingly violated the rules, they could face criminal indictment. That being said, there are still plenty of details to sort out, and we'll leave that to the prosecutors. That being said, we'd love to see MLB Commissioner Bud Selig thrown in jail for a bit. Not that he's done anything wrong, but he's a pretty huge jackass. But that's a topic for another day...

Our betting pool is at best a rough estimate -- no one knows how far the investigations will go, how long they will take, and who they will ensnare. All told, the most obvious political damage will be to Williams. His administration has prided itself on efficiency and responsibility, two traits that the Post's articles have directly challenged. Williams has not helped himself by remaining quiet on the allegations to date.


Email This Entry







Advertisement: DCist Continues Below!

Comments (20)

Why is Tom Davis getting involved in this??? He is from VA not DC! Yet another reason why the District should secede!

 

Why Gandhi will not be fired (sorry Martin):

http://www.washingtonian.com/people/05/gandhi.html

He ain't perfect but I'll take him over Barry and his coke snorting cronies...

 

You must be a product of the DC public school system.

Rep. Davis chairs the House Committee on Government Reform which oversees the DC budget. He has been a champion of DC voting rights in the past. If anything, this scandal will remind Congress of Barry-era DC and sully an improving (albeit slowly) image of the city.

 

Let them all bend over and feel my furry!

 

Suzzane Peck has got to go. In Monday's story "Lavish Spending, Little Reward" it is revealed that she paid Archie Prioleau $377,000 for a project that never happened, even though she had been warned beforehand he was a crook. And she claims to be saving DC money by hiring contractors instead of "mediocre" government employees. Gee thanks for your dedication Ms. Peck.

 

I'm not a big fan of Bobb, I didn't like him when I lived in Oakland and didn't think much of him when I was in Central Virginia and he was running Richmond (and no, I'm not stalking him, he's stalking me...) but it would kinda suck to be the fall guy for administration after administration. But, he's a play it by the rules kinda guy. He shook up Oakland government for the better, and pulled down overtime etc. He's not likely to go and he's the least likely to have agreed to this stuff.

 

Any bets on how gigantic the severance payments will be for anyone who does end up leaving? DC has a history of paying the incompetent and corrupt huge amounts to go away.

 

I think you're stretching Martin. Sure, this is a growing scandal, and there will a circus of "oversight hearings" where Councilmembers will talk about "heads rolling," but you're not going to see Ghandi, Bobb or Tillery go. They have done too much good, earned too much respect within the government and good government watchdogs, and have gotten things in pretty good order. Are they above reproach? No. But they'll just take some heat and keep on rolling.

Suzanne Peck and Anthony Pompa however are two possible candidates. Take a look at the difference between OCTO's annual budget from FY2004, FY2005 and FY2006. You'll see more than a doubling of her overall budget and the Post article points out she clearly couldn't manage it over the course of several years. If the worst she's willing to inflict on a deliquent contractor when she realizes we've been taken advantage of is to say, "The party is over", then its time for her to go.

 

And one more thing... if Williams fired Bobb, there'd be no one left to run the District. Bobb was given the keys while the Mayor went out to play and he has no intention of returning them (unless he's changed the locks).

 

Has anyone questioned the fact that what underlies all these bent rules is that folks wanted to help their friends out. By that Canavan and Morgan are known to be "best friends"; Peck and her team are known to be relatives; and so forth.

i believe that if the right questions were asked there would be a flood of more malfeasance and misfeasance that would fill up a book but how do you get to the core? Start at the top, RB, HT and you will be getting somewhere...otherwise call off the dogs because you wouldn't be serious in really seeing the truth come out.

 

Whose watch did this happen on? Council has to take some responsiblity too because they have know through the last round of hearings that office of contract and procurement was broken. What about Tillery? We cannot continue to support through our taxpayer dollars total incompetence. If he stays, that's what we would be doing by supporting("blissfully ignorant") Tillery (WPost) Come on now...

He has been deputy mayor for over 5 years and was responsible for procurement, property management and both the agencies are in shambles. He left the Health Department as Interim Director and almost destroyed the infrastructure before he did. What good has he done? He leaves a wake of a mess with all of his departures.

So, it is very interesting that the Post states that he may get to stay because he has been in the position for 1 year. In fact, he has had oversight for 5 years. When does one take responsiblity for the lack of integrity, management, leadership and direction that the DC government so much needs? The story is untold.

Sorry Mayor, you trusted the wrong people to do the job. Cut your losses now with known losers like Peck, Tillery, Bobb, and Ghandi. You deserve better than that because what will your legacy be now?

 

Mayor Williams is not all that clean either as he sold out the people of DC to the real estate biggies and watch, his next job will be one that they arrange.

Williams is just as dirty as Barry but in a different way.

Why isn't Williams running a third term? I think it is because he has been pressured by the US Attorney not too or their investigation into the Jemals will go further up to his desk. There was a sweet deal made here.

CLEAN HOUSE PEOPLE. All sitting council members need to be replaced is a good start.

 

VOTE MARTIN AUSTERMUHL for MAYOR!

 

Jonathan,

If you feel that way, why do you have a picture with you and Councilman Patterson on your Yahoo Group homepage?

Penny

 

Just because OCTO's budget has gone up, it doesn't mean it's not being used for useful stuff. Maybe they're doing a lot more now. That's not really a good argument.

 

Penny, the picture of Kathy Patterson and me is here > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DCWARD3/.

Better yet, click on my name and it will take you there.

 

Penny, I did not say that Patterson did any wrong but some in the media suggested that it may lead to some on the council!

It never fails in an election year for a scandal to break out. WHY then?

 

Penny, I have this mental image of you as this lady in her late 30's, about 5'4", 160lbs, short brown hair and you have a dart board in your livingroom with pictures of all our political leaders.

 

I think what we have heard is far from the whole story and people will start pointing fingers and bring others down with them.

Ah, 2006 is going to be grand!

 

REES FOR DC CITY COUNCIL WILL DO SOMETHING POSITIVE TO IMPROVE THE STATE OF DISTRICT POLITICS!

Beginning January 2, 2006, Team Rees will be distributing 20,000 "Mail In Voter's Registration" forms to homes throughout Ward
3 to encourage the 3,000 estimated persons who are eligible to vote but have not registered to become a part of our voting population.

Over a period of two years, we accumulated from around the city these "Mail In Voter's Registration" forms with the intent during
this campaign to really drive home the point that your VOTE DOES COUNT and to bring in new voters to the process.

We believe the low turn out rate in primaries and general elections is caused by many reason but mainly distrust by the public in their
elected officials and a feeling that their vote does not count as elected officials are out for themselves.

In other parts of the world, people are executed, intimidated and denied a right that we
Americans take for granted and we won't appreciate this precious right until one day we don't have it or have it on a very superficial basis.

TEAM REES will blanket Ward 3 with these "Mail In Voters' Registration Cards" along with our campaign advertisement which we believe voters will appreciate.

Jonathan R. Rees
Democrat For Ward 3 City Council
P.O. Box 21422, Washington, DC 20009


 
Post a comment (Comment Policy)