January 10, 2006
Fat Pig Deflates With Panache at Studio
Damn you, Neil LaBute. Damn you for getting your audience caught up in your clever dialogue, your complex, well-drawn characters and compelling plotline, and then making us leave the theatre feeling defeated about the state of humanity.
Then again, it’s what you do, and few do it better. When you see a show by the playwright who brought you In The Company Of Men and The Shape Of Things, among others, you know you’re in for a caustic ride. Fat Pig, now playing at Studio Theatre as part of its LaBute festival, is no exception.
Fat Pig is the story of the romance between Helen (Kate Debelack) and Tom (Tyler Pierce). Tom’s a fairly nice guy with a mediocre personality and a severe lack of backbone. But he’s decent-looking. Helen is vivacious, often confident, and bracingly funny. Plus, she’s fat. Not pleasantly plump, big-boned or any of the niceties – she’s a big girl.
So where does this leave them? The play is less about any sort of physical challenges the couple has to face – Tom is sexually attracted to Helen, and Helen, while not thrilled with her body, is comfortable enough to achieve self-acceptance. It’s more about what society has to say about the couple, personified in the characters of Carter, (Jason Odell Williams), Tom’s shallow co-worker, and Jeannie (Anne Bowles), his shrill ex-girlfriend, and what power their judgment ultimately holds.
Debelack and Pierce have a chemistry to envy – their first encounter in a cafeteria (aided by LaBute’s unadorned language and snappy pace) is nothing short of adorable, their flirting at times bold, at times hesitant. Helen transforms before Tom’s eyes from someone with which to avoid eye contact to an intriguing figure, the memory of which keeps him smiling for the rest of the workday. The actors invest their respective parts with conflicting layers of self-loathing, self-awareness, tenderness and sexual energy. The supporting performances are solid, if a bit archetypical – everyone knows a callow office jerk like Williams and Bowles does well as your standard obsessive, clingy, bordering-on-insane scorned chick.
Studio’s sets are smart, accomplishing a lot with a little – a backdrop indicating a generic office floor is spare, but surprisingly effective, and the same goes for the cafeteria. The costuming for Helen, whether she be in a bathing suit or sleepwear, is often rather revealing, making her weight an undeniable focus point rather than an afterthought, as is appropriate for the play’s purpose.
As for the writing? To put it simply, it grabs you. Humor peppers the dialogue at every turn, and the exchanges between Tom and Helen ring true, whether they be expressing optimism, desire, reservation or resignation. The play’s deflating conclusion may not be a surprise, given the playwright or the circumstances, but the fact that it leaves us as devastated as it does is a testimony to the actors and playwright who trick us into desperately hoping for a happy ending.
Fat Pig runs through Feb. 12 at Studio Theatre. For more information about the LaBute festival, visit the theater’s Web site.

i think im blind. for the love of god take that picture down.
Hey, who knew that shallow middle school boys were commenting on DCist entries!?
Ok, I have been attacked on this blog a few times so I'll just say please refer to the comment policy. Although I do not agree with omfg's post, I don't think personally attacking him is the way to go either Nate. He deserves not to be attacked even if he is making fun of others. He is clearly in the wrong, but attacking him makes us look foolish. Attack the substance, not the individual. (Sorry for those who are offended I am making the assumption the poster is a male).
thanks for standing up for me Mitch.
i guess nate didn't see the humor/irony in my posting, considering the play IS called FAT PIG and the basis for the play revolves around the trouble fat people have with social acceptance. i should have added that i did see the play and thought it was pretty good, fattys aside.
No problem. I might have to see this play. I haven't even heard about it, but with the holidays things like this were going to escape my eye.
Also, although I do understand your humor I would say you are asking for attacks posting on a site that has a lot of P.C. members.
I think, though my memory may fail me, that the lead woman was NOT a super big person; that she was, maybe, 20 or 30 pounds overweight, which contributed to the stir. . . Interesting casting differences in any event. I'm looking forward to seeing it again. And Autobahn!
Hey, if omfg's initial comment was ironic, then clearly my response was also ironic. I was just pretending to be offended, while parodying the usual DCist comment thread chaos by posting what appeared to be a personal attack on the commenter.
I'm just pretending to read this article. Ironic, no?
I think you all are pretending to have a brain. OMFG's comment was abusive both the first time and the second and he should be called on it. Calling heavy people "fatties" is no different that refering to his kind as "idiots". It is wrong to assign a slang name to anyone because of color, size, ethnicity, sexual orientation or any thing else. We are indiviuals and should be treated as such.
yes but about the play....
I'm not a verbal person, but I have to say I started to identify with the male lead. For those people who even for a moment aspire to be better than they are, what happens when you hit the wall? There is not infinite potential, everyone has flaws and limits. In this play the limit is fairly shallow, but how would you know that without trying? Everyone can be honourable when not tested.
I've been tested, and did not turn out to be honourable. It doesn't mean I won't be in the future (see what an optimist I am?), but you gotta pay to play....to know.
Yes well that was pretty self-absorbed...don't they have blogs for these sorts of things?
I turn to dcist for normally reliable reviews, but the positive review of this show is simply astonishing. Hey, I'm all for supporting the arts, especially in a city like DC where they are completely lacking, but this show is simply painful. Not painful in an awkward "In the Company of Men" way, just painful in a "this show is completely unwatchable" way. I saw this show last week, and my description of the acting as on the level with community theater was by far the kindest words that anyone in my party had for the show. I had to convince my other two friends not to walk out after 30 minutes.
Seriously, this show in terrible. There is NO chemistry between any of the actors. The lead male character honestly would not make the cut in most high school performances. I could go on for paragraphs about how bad this play is, but, in short, I would just recommend not going and saving yourself the ticket price. My ticket was free (thank God) and I still would like the 90 minutes of my life back.
If you think that watching terrible actors have a "relationship conversation" about how awful society is for shunning overweight people (sorry, "fat pigs"), then this show is for you.
I feel really bad for tearing apart a show in which the people clearly worked hard, but this isn't a middle school play. People are paying good money for these tickets, and they are getting ripped off. I hope the next time I go to the Source theater the quality of the play is better.
Um, Sadiespop...It's at the Studio Theater, not the Source Theater. Before you criticize the DC art scene, maybe you should learn a little about it first..
Sorry Celena, the Studio Theater, not the Source Theater (which is two blocks away), should have better quality productions.
Sorry Celena, the Studio Theater, not the Source Theater (which is two blocks away), should have better quality productions if they are going to charge $40 per ticket.
I'm glad to see that the DC art scene is open to criticism.