April 26, 2006
"Ubersexuals" Exhumed By McGinty, Pleasant Musk Ensues
Whether he was still caught up in the Easter spirit of resurrection or, perhaps more simply, finally catching up on Season 2 of Sex and the City, WUSA reporter Derek McGinty has apparently felt the need to defibrillate a long-dead term from the pop-cultural lexicography of yesteryear. Amid a flurry of blind quotes, mentions of hand lotion, and somewhat inconclusive statements from a self-styled "Grooming Guru," McGinty attempts to get to the root of what it means to be an "Ubersexual."
On its own, the term "Ubersexual" conjures the image of some wickedly pheromonal Teutonic race of erotic demigods, plowing deep furrows in the verdant fields of their sex partners while maintaining not just a level of moistness rarely found outside the roster of the Italian Men's soccer team, but also a smirking fluidity where the Kinsey scale is concerned. McGinty's specimens, by contrast, come off as semi-perplexed schmoes who seem tetchy over the perceived femininity that comes along with being tagged a "metrosexual."
Mostly, however, the practice of Ubersexuality comes across in the article as a random assortment of sartorial and grooming choices baked into a half-assed lifestyle casserole: "A Metrosexual, let’s say will take a shower, use scrub on his hands, use a nail brush, then come out and moisturize his hands - whereas an Ubersexual will just use hand lotion."
Uhm, sure. Though one would like to think that showering might be something we could all enjoy.
With the random quotes and the deluge of terminology ("Old School", "Marlboro Man"), it becomes difficult to determine where "Ubersexuality" begins and ends. This is perhaps fitting: the discovery of a unified field theorem for how people come to slap their genitals together would very likely take all the fun out of it. One thing's for sure, however: before another article on another group of Prefixsexuals gets penned, let's at least have some baseline evidence that someone's actually getting boned. Otherwise, it's all just hot talk about soap and water.





I thought it was Ryan Seacrest..
I am so confused.
A more complete survey of the practices of the Ubersexual can be found in Nietzsche's classic, Thus Spanked Zarathustra.
let's at least have some baseline evidence that someone's actually getting boned
Otherwise we're dealing with metroineffectuals.
Somebody stop me!
Stop you before you make an "Ecce Homo" crack you'll later regret? Or call someone a Jean-Luc Nancy-boy? Either would be pretty Foucaulted up, as I'm sure you'd agree.
I for one have often combined showering with my sexuality and am now considered a Lufasexual.
Wait, I'm sorry, you say this came from a news program? It seems horribly unfair that someone got paid for doing that story, yet would probably get fired for writing copy as delightful as "...the discovery of a unified field theorem for how people come to slap their genitals together..."
Discipline and punish, baby, discipline and punish.
Quality article, Jason. Thanks!
This article brings back an old question: with "metrosexual" taken, what do we call people who hook up on the Metro? PoAdMoSexuals? Trainssexuals? Condfucktors?
Although I believe and hope the term metrosexual has been relagated to the ash heap of pop-history, I can't help but point out again that metro doesn't mean "city". It's the "polis" part of metropolis that means city. Metro means "mother".
Thus metropolis means mother-city, and metrosexual means "mother-sexual". Which, if accurate, means they have a lot more to worry about than increasing manicure bills.