May 31, 2006

D.C. Getting Fewer Anti-Terror Dollars

DHS logo with a dollar sign superimposed over itNBC4 brings word that the region's security officials will have to do some belt-tightening this year -- the Department of Homeland Security will be reducing the D.C. area's share of federal anti-terror money from $77.5 million to $46 million. The overall size of the grants will be dropping, but D.C.'s receding share seems to largely be due to a new focus on spreading the money more evenly among different communities.

Admittedly, it could be worse: New York's share of the total grants will be reduced by $83 million. And it's hard not to argue that some of the region's federally-supplied security grants have been misspent — this 2003 Post story springs to mind, which reported that federal security dollars were being spent on such anti-terror initiatives as janitorial service and a $300,000 computerized car-towing system.

But it's also hard to argue with articles like this one, which point out that while small midwestern hamlets aren't all that likely to suffer from terrorist attacks, they're every bit as capable of misspending federal money. We know that as part of the executive branch, DHS is nominally immune to these concerns — but one can't help but wonder if the sudden desire to spread terror dollars around might have more to do with the Hill's current pre-midterm pork frenzy than with making sure the District and the rest of the country are as safe as they can be.


Email This Entry







Advertisement: DCist Continues Below!

Comments (2)

The entire DHS funding allocation process should be scrapped. It's impossible to provide 100% terror prevention coverage for the entire nation (leave the natural disaster portion out of this, as DHS has proven entirely incompetent in that realm). If someone REALLY wants to poison the water supply of Minot, ND, he will find a way to do so. The DHS money should only go to locations that actually have symbolic terrorist value, i.e. Washington, New York, Los Angeles, etc. However, since DHS budget allocations are dictated by Conressional commitees, the entire process will turn into the aforementioned pork frenzy. I say scrap the entire DHS budget and use the resultant deficit reduction to form specialized projects aimed at actual terrorist targets.

 

How can it be worse that the NY's DHS anti-terror budget is being reduced by an amount greater than DC's entire budget was before reductions?

 
Post a comment (Comment Policy)