July 17, 2006
The Wilson Bridge is Dead; Long Live the Wilson Bridge
This past weekend, Beltway traffic began moving entirely on the gleaming new span of the Woodrow Wilson Bridge, the completed first half of a project to replace the old river-crossing with 12 shimmering lanes, arcing from Virginia, through a sliver of District, into Maryland. Almost immediately, reports NBC 4, demolition began on the old Wilson bridge.
That old bridge was a pain. It was cramped and usually jammed. Planners hadn't anticipated the crush of traffic that would flow, or creep, over the roadway, and backups often stretched miles, allowing those driving over the bridge to peer down through cracks in the aging asphalt to the river below. The old bridge was built low, necessitating the use of the drawbridge with unfortunate regularity, which brought the thousands of cars of commuters and travelers along 1-95 to a complete stop. It was the bridge everyone loved to hate, and its removal from the highway system this weekend has prompted more cheers than encomia. Good riddance, is the refrain around the town, to bad rubbish.
But you know what? I'm going to miss it.
Growing up, my mother's family lived in Baltimore, and every visit we paid them from our home in North Carolina involved a long drive on I-95, through the wooded Carolina and Virginia countryside. Pretty enough, I suppose, but for a kid in a pre-Game Boy age, it was dreadfully boring. For me, the Wilson Bridge signaled the arrival of the new and exciting. It meant looking left to see downtown Washington, and looking right to the looming tower of the drawbridge control room. That tower was the gateway to the metropolitan giants of the Northeast, the beginning of proper cities where exciting things went on and the concrete monstrosities of buildings and bridges and tunnels stood as testaments to the activity of American life. For me, that bridge separated the familiar and the unfamiliar, the past and the potential. Now when I see it, flying away beneath me at hundreds of miles per hour, it means I'm home, landing at National Airport, back to the place I know best. So yes, I'm going to miss the old thing. Maybe because I don't end up losing hours everyday to the traffic it causes, but still; it's a Washington landmark, and it's one I came to know long before I'd visited the marble edifices of the Mall. So there you go, old bridge, there's your eulogy.
Readers, feel free to add your own in the comments. Tell us what you loved about it and what you hated.





Ryan: I understand your nostalgia but gimme a break. This was an UGLY, CROWDED bridge that suffered from poor design and shoddy construction. Missing something this useless and headache-inducing is odd.
Will you miss RFK when the Nats are playing in a sparkling, state-of-the-art ballpark in a few years? Because the old Wilson Bridge has as much "charm" as RFK does now, and I won't be shedding any tears when I don't have to make the trek out to that shithole.
I've lived here since 1993, and I can count on one hand the number of times I've crossed the Wilson Bridge. It was a total non-factor for me. And I own a car.
same deal matt, i've lived here since 1999 and have never even seen the wilson bridge ... go figure
Ugly, crowded bridge to be sure. I just wish they renamed. I know we have had racist, elitists and otherwise unsavory presidents, but I think we could do better for this century.
Goodbye WWB. I remember my Dad's '67 beetle broke down during afternoon gridlock in the summer. He had to push it almost the entire length of the bridge to MD. Good times.
On a related note, will that giant Woodrow Wilson "coin" be saved?
"shoddy construction"
Hardly, the fact that it is still standing after all these years is a testament of the engineers who designed it. Little did they envision mega SUV's, 24 hour traffic and monster 18 wheelers pounding the span for nearly after half a century. Ugly yes, build well (for the time)..defiantly.
I really hope they name it the Ronald Regan Memorial Bridge…I mean we haven’t named anything after him since he died.
"I really hope they name it the Ronald Regan Memorial Bridge…I mean we haven’t named anything after him since he died."
No, but they did name an airport for him while he was still alive. I doubt that he knew it, but they did. While I'm all for saving the WWB "coin" I agree wtih miamista that there are at least a dozen other presidents that would be better suited for having a bridge named after them. I'd like to see at least something in this town named for Nixon.
While we're at it, can we rename the city, "Reagan, D.C."?
the wilson bridge wasn't designed to carry as much traffic as it did. when it was under construction, I-95 was supposed to go through DC. When that stretch of highway got cancelled, it increased the amount of traffic beyond what the wilson bridge was designed to handle.
Will you miss RFK when the Nats are playing in a sparkling, state-of-the-art ballpark in a few years?
You're damn right I will. RFK may not have a lot of charm, but many of us who grew up here have lots of great memories of that place.
The WWB, however, has never been much more than a big pain in the ass.
I can understand the sensitivity about Wilson and the desire to choose another president. Perhaps things are finally coming up Millard Fillmore?
I'm with Matt and PD. After more than 15 years in DC, I think I've been on the WWB once. I always hear horror stories about traffic on the WWB and the Springfield mixing bowl and think, "Are these real places? Are they near Narnia and Middle Earth?"
I'll take my seven-block commute any day.
Oh great, more lanes of traffic.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Induced_demand