August 1, 2006
Charlie Palmer Mistake
I want to love Charlie Palmer Steak. The restaurant's absolutely genial namesake chef is responsible for several outstanding restaurants around the country -- among them the Dry Creek Kitchen in Healdsburg, Calif. and Aureole in New York City and Las Vegas. Young executive chef Bryan Voltaggio is a tremendous talent whose kitchen turns out consistently tasty, season-conscious, non-traditional steakhouse fare. The main dining room offers a stunning view of the Capitol. Not only is its all-American wine list among the very best in town, the spot doesn't charge a corkage fee if you bring in an American wine. And Charlie Palmer Steak is one of the few high-end D.C. restaurants that features a Restaurant Week-style promotion year-round with its three-course lunch menu for $20.06.
But I don't love Charlie Palmer Steak. And it's not because the restaurant's dinner menu is priced through the roof. It's because the service is regularly subpar. And the prices that they're charging only magnify the profound service woes. It's a shame too. The food at Charlie Palmer Steak is better than at any steakhouse in town and indeed matches up extremely well against the food at the city's top eateries. But the inept service obscures all that.
So, I'll propose an intervention. Charlie and Bryan, come into this room. You've got so much talent, so much promise. But it's being squandered by your service team. No, don't get up, Charlie and Bryan, don't walk out. Not yet. You have to hear my story. You have to hear how bad it is out there. It is a tale of already-bitten chocolate truffles and ignorant wine stewards. It's the only way you can fix things. We love you. We want to make things better.
Getting seated at Charlie Palmer Steak is a to-do. After you give your name to the hostess, you're taken to your table past a stunning glass wine cellar suspended above a pebble-dappled pool of water. Upon being seated, the hostess places on your lap a cloth napkin that most closely matches the color of your pants or skirt. She brings you your metal-encased menus, which slide into weighted slots on the table. Because you can only see your dining partner if you peek out from above the top of your now hands-free menu, you feel as if you're playing Battleship against your date. The bread steward asks you if you'd like white bread, wheat bread, or olive bread. Another server asks you if you'd like a cocktail. "Perhaps in a minute," you say. "We haven't had a chance to look at the drink list yet." So far, Bryan and Charlie, I might lose the hands-free menu bit, but generally it's all good.
But here's where things start to collapse. Servers, pit bosses, bussers, and wine stewards swarm around a half-empty restaurant. They go to the bar. They talk to one another. They fawn over that table that has just purchased that ridiculously marked-up bottle of 2002 Joseph Phelps cabernet sauvignon. They make eye contact with you and look away. In other words, they don't want to be interrupted from doing nothing. All of which leads to the question: how many people does it take to take your order at Charlie Palmer Steak? The answer is ten -- nine to avoid your table for 25 minutes and one to stop reluctantly after your third "excuse me" and a stare-down.
Even though you recognize full well that the restaurant is making a killing on the dish, you order the addictive yellow fin tuna tartare appetizer ($18) for the two of you. And it is a steakhouse after all, so you opt for the New York strip steak ($36), while your date goes for the filet ($33). Both medium rare, of course. And you'll share the summer squash casserole ($9) and some bearnaise sauce ($2). And yes, you'll have cocktails -- it turns out that, no, there's no drink list, so you order a glass of rosé for yourself and your date goes for a Belvedere martini. The drinks arrive briskly, as does a lukewarm curry-spiked squash soup as an amuse-bouche.
About 10 minutes later, the wine steward finally drops by and sees that you've brought your own wine. It's a bottle of 1997 Van Der Heyden cabernet sauvignon from the Napa Valley's Stags Leap District -- a wine that you've been saving for five years and a small-production wine that even Charlie Palmer Steak doesn't have on its list. He opens the bottle for you, and you offer him a taste to be courteous. He thanks you and looks at the label, remarking that he's never heard of the wine. He pours, but he doesn't return for a taste.
In the meantime, your tuna appetizer arrives -- an Asian-inspired seasoned raw tuna cake with six sesame crackers in a sort of mini-desk file on the side. It's small for a whopping $18, but at least it's done right -- a hint of lime ponzu, a bit of avocado on the bottom, cleansingly bitter baby tat-soi gracing the top. It's gone in a flash.
You start to drink your wine while you wait for the steaks. The wine steward steers well clear of your table, occupying himself with a pair of big-spenders who are clearly slaves to Robert Parker and his points. "Is it because we brought our own wine?" you think. Surely, the restaurant wouldn't trumpet their liberal corkage policy and then look with disdain on those who take advantage of it. You must pour your second glass yourself.
The steaks are here, and they are shimmery and massive -- with wonderful caramelization on the surfaces and pinkness on the insides. The rich, tarragon-flecked bearnaise sauce brightens the natural meat flavors and sets off the charred exterior, as do the five mustards -- lemon, green peppercorn, tarragon, whole-grain Pommery, and "spicy" -- that appear alongside the steaks as if they were oil paints on a palette. The summer squash casserole tastes like eggplant parm at one of those old-school red-sauce Italian places. Bryan and Charlie, you've done it again.
Your cleaned plates sit idle for awhile. With the wine steward yukking it up with the Phelps boys, you pour the last of the wine into your glasses because no one will do it for you. A busser takes the plates away, and you drink the last of your wine. Moments later, the wine steward comes by and relieves you of the empty bottle. On his way back to the kitchen, he sniffs the neck of the bottle and looks again at the label. It's as if he didn't even want to try the out-of-the-ordinary wine you'd offered him. And what kind of wine steward is one who isn't curious in the least?
Having gorged yourself on meat, you politely decline dessert. Minutes later, another server returns with your check and with a delightful assortment of "mignardises" -- the post-dinner Andes mints of the fancy restaurant set. There are raspberry-chocolate truffles, brittle, sugared nuts, and jellies. The truffles are so purely chocolate that your dining partner asks if she might have just one more. The server goes into the kitchen and returns with a small bowl containing two more truffles. This might save the night, you think.
But then your date picks up one of the newly brought truffles and sees an unmistakable bitemark in it. Half of it has been "removed" by a previous diner. When alerted to the existence of this ABC truffle, the server brings it back to the kitchen. He comes back a few moments later and explains that the truffle had been cut by a fork. Yeah, maybe a fork shaped like a tooth.
There's no shame in recycling bread, and there's no shame in recycling mignardises. But there is shame in not acknowledging problems when they pop up. And there's even more shame in lying about them. And service has been a major problem at Charlie Palmer Steak ever since it opened.
Please, Charlie and Bryan, do something about it.
Charlie Palmer Steak
101 Constitution Avenue NW
(202) 547-8100




They actually gave you a half-eaten truffle? Ugh. What terrible service.
cant pour your own wine? what world are you living in?
zombo, it's not a matter of can't, it's a matter of a proper wine service. The steward should be attentive and interested in how your meal is progressing in terms of the wine, especially if you've brought your own and he has a chance to learn about something new.
I can also cook my own steak, but sometimes want to go to a restaurant to have them do it for me.
Not only is its all-American wine list among the very best in town...
You say that like it's a good thing...
i guess i see your point. it just seems a bit silly to me. i understand that if you are going to a resturant and are going to pay a certain price you expect the right kind of service.
I am not sure how pouring your own wine amounts to poor service. You sure seem to bitch about it. Enjoy the steak and the view and lighten up!
Get over it. Stick to Ray's.
I think that food and restaurants are one of the things that DCist has been best at, but this goes a little off the rails for me. This is a personal complaint about a single dining experience, not a restaurant review, and even as eloquently as it is written, it comes across as petty. It's times like this I almost wish you'd go back to the royal we, as it might deter the sort of postings best made on contributors' personal blogs.
No- a price markup that large comes, in part, from specialized services like the wine service. Even if you bring your own wine, the wine steward should play nice.
Let's get clear on the concept here: One would think that rather than employ a wine steward who either can't or won't do his job correctly, the restaurant could get rid of him and pass the monies saved from payroll on to the customer.
Now, that said, I've been burned by truffles before, so, when I go out to a fancy restaurant, I usually bring along my own personal truffle toother. That's just how I roll. But I appreciate Charlie Palmer's effort in anticipating my needs in that regard.
I defend the author of this article. If I'm going out to a nice place and I'm gonna drop this kind of money, I would expect to have my wine poured for me, to never wait for my water to be refilled. I'd expect the service to reflect the price tag.
It's not the pouring itself that is the problem; it's the inattentiveness.
Yeah Nate, but then noone would see the posting.
The pre-chomped truffle is the big red flag for me. At a place that costs as much as CP, NO FOOD should EVER be served to more than one table. In addition to being gross, I believe it's also against the law.
burritoes and pink lemonade are my truffles and wine. i pour my own p.l. by the way.
I'm with poster on this one. Once my date and I decided decided to steer clear of the wine list and enjoy a couple extra dirty martinis, the service disappeared. (Although the busboy was damn attentive)
I want to like the place, but they make it really clear that unless you're ordering the big ticket wines, you don't really matter.
Jeez, they were $30 entrees. Don't expect to have your wine glass refilled for that, and do expect to have the bill plomped in front of you before the plates are even cleared. This is America.
You want wine service? Go to the $100 dinner places. Or Europe. Don't expect it here at a mid-priced place.
Consider yourself lucky the server wasn't wearing a "Ask me for dessert" button.
So hotsauce, if my man was really that put off by the service he's totally justified in leaving a $2 tip, right? I have no patience for crappy service at restaurants - my money is green too. You wanna be snooty? I wanna be stingy. Slight this brother and you'll get a $0.40 Metro Farecard in a pool of Grey Poop-on as a tip.
Its no crime to not be used to be ignorant of professionial service. I'd just suggest you get out more to experience it - budget allowing, of course.
And no, you don't pour your own wine.
I work at a restaurant and being ignored by staff like this during what doesn't seem like an overly busy shift can't be excused. No fawning is necessary, but getting attention of staff shouldn't feel like work, particularly at a CP price bracket. Also, next time you are at the beach with a high-end restaurant server, check out his middle deltoids. More likely than not, they will sport a fine definition. Or they should, anyway. That's because they work these arms by pouring lots of wine. Into glasses. You know. Service and stuff.
I will side with the poster in that this was intended to be a suggestion for improved service to the owners, rather than simply a complaint. I dont think there's anything wrong with expecting a slightly more attentive staff, especially on a less busy night.
Homeboy: you tip according to the level of service appropriate for that establishment. A 30 buck place is not going to have all the waiter support a better place has—you're just gonna get a waiter and a busboy. He didn't go to the Inn at Little Washington for heaven's sake. Keep your expectations realistic—and never having to pour your wine at a 30 buck joint aint it.
leaf: Wow... let me do a few shots of espresso and get back to you.
Nadya:
1. Agree with the first bit (certainly the time it took them to get his order sounded crazy).
2. Please, please write an article about 30 bone joints where I never have to pour my own wine. Having my wine glass refilled has been a pleasant surprise at these places. Most of the time, I can sit with an empty glass and get annoyed, or quit fighting reality and pour my own wine.
3. I like your dining articles (despite the whole blacklisting madness in the last one).
Homeboy: You tip for service appropriate to price. He didn't go to The Inn at Little Washington, for heaven's sake. Keep your expectations realistic—and never having to pour your own wine at a 30 buck joint aint it.
leaf: Wow... Let me do a double espresso and get back to you.
Nadya:
1. I agree with your first bit (waiting that long to order is nuts).
2. Please, please do tell of 30 bone joints where I never have to pour my wine. It's always been a pleasant surprise at these places to have my wine refilled. For the most part, I can sit with an empty glass and get annoyed, or I can accept that waiters here don't have the support of better places and pour my own wine.
3. I like your dining articles (despite the blacklisting madness in the last one).
Let's not underestimate the cost of the meal based on the entree price. If your entree is over $30, then your meal will approach a hundred after everything else is added - appetizer, salad, drinks, dessert, coffee, etc. These places do not include side dishes and have to be ordered separately for more cash.
Not pouring my wine is not a deal-breaker, but it is certainly something that makes a regular evening more special. Would you want a big pitcher of ice water sitting on the table and have to refill your own glass while condensation runs down the side? A waiter who is standing is in a better position to pour cleanly.
Restaurant staff who are lazy and stand around talking instead of working is a huge problem in the industry in this city. It's one thing if they're "on call" and come over as soon as you make eye contact, but more often than not it takes a hand wave or verbal request to get service, which should not be your primary concern during an expensive meal out.
Last year I went to CP with a girlfriend for lunch. As two women dining together, we were put in the very back of the restaurant and essentially ignored. I was out of the office for three hours! The food was fine, but the attitude and service made the experience one I would not want to repeat.
Sauce- thanks for the info on how to tip. I've never eaten at a restaurant before so I had no idea...
Sounds like you tip based soley on the price of the meal regardless of the experience you had. That sounds really dumb. I hope to one day wait on you somewhere so I can ignore you, take a bite out of your candy, and get a fatty tip.
Seems like a perfectly reasonable complaint for a fairly expensive dinner. The point also isn't that you CAN'T pour your own wine, it's that you're paying not to.
*Sigh*
No, Homeboy, I did not say "tip according to price", I said expect service according to price. I reaffirmed my point by warning against unrealistic expectations. To further help you out, I even gave you an illustration: you cannot pay 30 bucks for an entrée and expect Inn at Little Washington service.
I fail to see how you misunderstood my position. Perhaps you are twisting it into something silly in order to have the last word. In that case you may have it; there is little point in posting further to this thread.
Before the thread dies, I'd like to add a few things.
First, if a restaurant touts itself as having an exceptional wine program (which, yes, includes both selection and service), I do expect an increased measure of attentiveness to pouring and wine service, regardless how much I'm paying. Charlie Palmer Steak trumpets its wine program, and that sets diners' expectations high.
Second, I do think that a restaurant with entrees averaging in the mid-$30s (and rising much higher -- CPS's Wagyu sirloin goes for a not-cheap $68) is an expensive restaurant, and I think that the high prices should be reflected in the service, wine or otherwise. By the logic given above, I shouldn't expect quality wine service at *any* restaurant with comparable food prices, even if I were to order a bottle of wine that costs $600 (which one may most certainly do at CPS). The point here isn't that we should expect increasingly poor service as prices drop or increasingly better service as prices rise, but rather that you should always expect that service be generally gracious and generally attentive. Price levels and restaurant idiosyncracies may suggest different perks, but CPS isn't even reaching these baseline levels.
Third, I was surprised by how few people commented on the half-eaten truffle (!) that appeared at my table (and the ensuing cover-up explanation), but instead focused mainly on my comments about the (lack of) wine service. Interesting to see what irked people more.
Thanks to all for commenting.
Five months later... we just visited CP last night during restaurant week. Generally, I have found the service sub-par during restaurant week at any/all restaurants we have visited. CP was great and the service was great!
P.S. Van Der Heyden is awesome!!!!!