February 4, 2007

Second Center?

Buildings_02022007.jpgFormer Editor-in-Chief Ryan Avent writes a weekly column about neighborhood and development issues.

"Has a second core emerged?" asked a Bureau of Labor Statistics report this week, drawing the metropolitan area's attention to the remarkable growth in business and professional employment in Virginia's Fairfax County. Headline after headline emphasized the county's new status as second pole in a newly bipolar metropolis, after we learned that Fairfax had pulled to within 100,000 jobs of the District itself. The government report went on to dub Fairfax the regional leader in private sector employment, the end result of 15 years of explosive growth fueled in no small part by extensive government outsourcing and contracting.

The BLS report highlighted what has been a remarkable series of years for all of greater Washington. While our population growth hasn't quite kept up with some of the sunbelt's most energetic boomtowns, the Washington region's job explosion has left all other challengers in the dust. No other area of the country has managed to keep up with the capital's employment growth since 1990, and the role of Washington's suburban counties cannot be overstated as part of that change.

As cores go, however, the old center and its challenger look quite a bit different. Fairfax County contains within its 400 square miles approximately 1 million people and 800,000 jobs. The old core, on the other hand (taken to contain the District, Arlington, and Alexandria) squeezes the same number of people and one third more jobs into a quarter of the area. Perhaps more telling, the old core is home to 54 Metro stations while Fairfax has a mere 6--even the completion of the planned Silver Line will add only 8 more to Fairfax's total. Commuting patterns reflect the infrastructure gap between the two hubs. Of those working in the District, only 8% come from outside the city and its inner suburbs (the border jurisdictions and Fairfax). Of those working in Fairfax County, by contrast, 22 percent come from exurban jurisdictions. Nearly 75 percent of metropolitan commuters from Loudoun and Prince William Counties go to work in Fairfax. Practically all of them drive.

Fairfax is working hard to overhaul its status as one large low density traffic jam. In addition to the reworking of Tyson's Corner and the construction of the Silver Line, Fairfax has given the green light to the high density MetroWest project at the Vienna Metro station, and has begun to look at reinventing the land around the Springfield-Franconia station as another dense hub. While other suburban counties (including Montgomery County, perhaps Fairfax's main rival as a suburban jobs center) have decided to rein in new growth and development, Fairfax has committed itself to ploughing ahead full bore, recognizing that such a strategy will mean greater density and a change in the county's character.

But will it be enough? Fairfax is sure to continue adding jobs and people; it remains the county's official policy, and the federal government is happy to oblige them by continuing to shift large numbers of federal jobs outward. Yet Richmond lawmakers continue to demonstrate their inability to address current infrastructure needs, let alone those which are sure to arise in an environment of continued expansion. Officials battled for nearly a decade to make construction of the Silver Line a reality, and it will be almost a decade more before the extension is completed, assuming ambitious goals are met. Perhaps one day, a circumnavigating Purple Line will snake through Fairfax as well, but even that addition would leave the county woefully underserved by mass transit relative to the central city.


Photo by billadler.

Without drastic infrastructure improvements, continued job growth in the new employment core will mean soaring Fairfax home prices, greater pressure on existing roads and transit lines, and rapid sprawl. Plans in Loudoun and Prince William to restrict growth will only exacerbate outward movement of the city's boundaries, forcing new growth to leapfrog those counties into the wilds of Fauquier and Stafford, Jefferson and Spotsylvania.

The situation isn't hopeless. Fairfax County could work with the central jurisdictions and Maryland suburbs to coordinate planning and increase Metro's capacity. The region could focus on improving regional rail service, which is widly underutilized given current traffic problems. Options are available.

But the outlook for real progress isn't promising. If recent experience has taught us anything, it's that conditions must deteriorate significantly before local governments can be pressed to act. The best hope for the near term is that Fairfax will be forced to invest in itself to defend the ground it has won. That's certainly not the best way to plan for one's future, but without a sense of shared reponsibility for regional planning, that's about the best we can hope for.


Email This Entry







Advertisement: DCist Continues Below!

Comments (12)

Ryan,

I assume your facts and projections are not just pulled out of your ass, it will help if you were able to site at least a few more sources than the spattering that you have.

Also you forgot to figure the impact that BRAC will have, taking 30,000 jobs out of the old core (Arlington) to the new (south Fairfax County).

 

Those numbers are impressive and all, but 400 square miles??? Calling that a core is a bit of a misnomer in my opinion, unless referring specifically to jobs around a central location, such as tysons, but I'm assuming these 800,000 jobs are much more spread out than that. This is a real urban planning problem that will require significant infrastructure planning and investment. Until then, and until there is adequate public transportation underlying the area, there is only one "core" and the rest is sprawl. I don't want to take anything away from this impressive growth, but how do you draw a line around cores except by infrastructre?

 

RJ, the numbers on jobs and commuters are all taken from the BLS report, to which I've linked above.

 

Second paragraph, last sentence clause: "the role of Washington's suburban counties cannot be understated as part of that change." I think you meant to write "overstated", not "understated".

 

You're right, Mark. Correcting.

 

Now that Fairfax is said be approaching parity of influence in the area, now you want to claim Arlington and Alexandria? Whatever. That's a fantastically fickle sense of identity you're deploying there, one that display's a bizarre insecurity about Fairfax.

 

Agree with Pete -- all the sudden Arlington & Alexandria are part of DC -- weak

 

I'm talking about concentrations of economic activity here. If you don't believe the dense office environments just across the river from downtown D.C. are part of the same jobs core, then that's your prerogative. Identity, or who claims to be a part of what, has nothing to do with my arguments.

 

Montgomery County is not Fairfax County's main susburban rivalry for jobs. Companies considering Fairfax also consider the following domestic markets: Silicon Valley, Research Triangle, Boston, and Austin.

Worldwide, Fairfax also targets Bangalore, London, Seoul, Tel Aviv, and Frankfurt.

This is not a local rivalry. The markets for jobs is global, and Fairfax is trying its best at it.

 

I agree w/ Pete too, but that's not a big deal. However, a good deal of Arlington and Alexandria residents come into Fairfax to work. Arlington and Alexandria are every bit as close to Fairfax economically as they are to DC.

In the big picture, I agree, this article is good to bring up the problems that will be encountered w/o too many cheap shots which seems all too common these days. Everyone knows Fairfax is congested and sprawly, but I say give Fairfax one last chance. I feel like now that density is being given more of a voice, some good things can happen, but it'll be mostly bad if the infrastructure improvements aren't being done simultaneously, which I certainly hope will be the case.

Someday, there will be more a semblance of a core, but it'll always be disconnected when compared to a real city, but we have make the best of what we have and not make the mistakes of the past.

 

The last thing you want is to expand mass transit to exurbs, if you want to control sprawl. Mass transit only decreases the commute burden, which will encourage growth out in even more distant communities. Currently, there people are starting to look at inner-burbs because they don’t want their commute burden to interfere with their quality of life.

 

Good point. I agree for the most part, but the people in charge of zoning can be a lot more strict on how developments are approved. So even if people are deciding to live further out, at least they could be living in a more organized, sustainable environment that could still have charm. I don't think people ought to be deprived of mass transit in Fairfax, though, which I don't consider an exurb. There are enough jobs scattered around so bus transit at least should be encouraged. And maybe in the future when the county has succeeded w/ denser developments light rail and BRT can be implemented, whichever one is better for the situation.

 
Post a comment (Comment Policy)