May 29, 2007
Rock Throwing, Attacks in Columbia Heights Return
It's been since last October that we heard much more about any rock throwing attacks in Columbia Heights. Despite the prevalence of these types of assaults last year, thought to be perpetrated by groups of neighborhood kids, they had seemingly stopped sometime over the winter and not begun anew, until now.
Council member Jim Graham (D-Ward 1) has been circulating a couple of emails to District police officials and neighborhood listserves: one that reports a group of kids throwing rocks at apartment windows and breaking them (it's unclear from the email which street this is), and another that relates a story of a physical assault by some youths on 14th NW.
Councilmember Jim Graham, last Friday, the 25th of May, my partner and I were walking south on 14th Street. When we reached Fairmont and 14th there was a group of kids using plastic milk crates to sit on, on the side of the sidewalk. When we crossed Fairmont and reached the group, one of them screamed, jumped up from the crate he was sitting on and slugged my partner in the groin. There were about 10 kids in group and I would say the ages were from around 10 to 18. They thought this was one of the funniest things they had ever done, from the laughing they were doing.
We weren't sure what to do. We live 2 blocks away and didn't want to do anything to make us a permanent target. I'm sure we were not the only people picked out to harass, maybe we were the only ones to get hit that day, don't know.
We moved onto Clifton St. last November and have noticed nothing but animosity and hatred towards us from the black neighbors that have been living here for a while. We even had rocks thrown at us last fall. I have never, ever in my life lived in an area where people were attacked on the street the way we were for no reason.
There's a lot going on in this letter, to be sure. Assault, racial tension, gentrification, unsupervised children, and if you tend to read the word "partner" and assume we're probably talking about a gay couple, then add a potential hate crime element into the mix. It's disturbing on so many levels: a group of kids that thinks it's OK to attack and intimidate people on the street, and a couple who lumps all black people in their neighborhood together into one big group that they think is out to get them.
This report comes at the same time as another instance of rock-throwing youths in the city, this time in the Capitol Hill neighborhood. The City Paper blog posted a first-person account by one of its writers of being attacked by kids throwing eggs, rocks, and bottles at their neighbors.
We're sure many of our readers live in proximity to these neighborhoods. We'd like to create room for some honest discussion about all of the issues surrounding these incidents -- but please, keep it civil. We'll be moderating the comments.

As I walked from my place in Columbia Heights to my friend's apartment in Mount Pleasant, I saw a string of graffiti that read various anti-genny messages including "Go Home Rich White People."
My first thought was, "at least the 'rich' part rules me out." Then, "what about rich black people--why do they get a pass?" Finally I wondered, "what are the chances that was written by some rich white kid himself a la Borf?"
The neighborhood I grew up in is blacker than the one I live in now. I don't know where I'm supposed to "go home" to.
ok, i'll bite, i imagine the posts to go something like this...
"Damn Black People"
"Damn Gay People"
"Can't we all just get along"
"Damn White people"
"Mike Licht sounds like..."
... *sigh* at least controversy keeps your ad revenue up guys, get those hits baby...
Well, I hate to add to the string but I guess knowing what is happening can may help to stop things. I was at La Lomita on Friday night, sitting inside with my family, when behind me sitting on the patio, two men were attacked for no reason. The man next to us saw it happen and so did my daughter, both facing the window. A group of six kids walked by, then two doubled back and punched two men in the face. Then they ran. I don't know any more than what we saw... the kids were Black, the men were White, and they may have been Gay. But boy it sucks to be sitting at a favorite neighborhood spot and see something that mean and hateful used for teenage entertainment, no matter what the "reason" for the attack was.
By the way, we called 911 and there was a very fast response by police (more than one car) and by ambulance.
First off, I don't see the reason why this person is basically labelled racist by saying that black neighbors are acting in a certain way toward them. Should he have said "some black neighbors", to therefore limit the generalization? Seems a little ticky-tack to scold the victim for that. He obviously feels hatred coming from a certain set of neighbors. Why can't he say which ones?
Second, this just goes to show that CH has a long way to go. There is a lot of crime that still happens, despite all the new development and influx of residents. Packs of unsupervised kids run around all the time, yelling, throwing trash all around, etc etc. Some say that this is just a matter of time until rising property values (and taxes) force out lower income folks (which one would assume includes the kids that like punching random pedestrians). Maybe it is, but something should still be done about it now. I personally have seen more police presence in the past week or two - hopefully this keeps up.
Black kids around here don't like gays. They learn it from their elders. Saying they learn it from their parents assumes they know who their parents are and I'm not going to make that leap. I don't see why these incidents surprise anyone. Ignorant and violent blacks are simply D.C.'s version of southern rednecks, Brooklyn goombahs and Boston southies.
I have no experience with this; the kids in my neighborhood don't fuck with me at all, ever. I have a few things working in my favor:
1. I'm Black
2. I'm big (6'3", 275)
3. I've been living in the same area long enough that the kids who are now teenagers have been seeing me since they were small children.
I think #3 is the long pole in the tent.
I hate to say it, but it's the weather. The temperature rose and sh*t hit the fan. Within the last week alone several of my friends [myself included] have experienced neighborhood kids having "fun". Last wednesday kids in my neighborhood decided to have target practice [using a rifle] with my living room window. And just the night before last, another friend of mine was held at gun point half a block from his house by a young person. All I can say is, call the police, call the police, call the police. They will show up and gradually will increase their presence if they know of trouble areas. Don't assume your neighbor is going to do something, pick up the phone and call someone.
Apparently they are putting in a police "sub-station" in the upper area of Meridian Hill Park, near the east entrance across from Chapin St. But this is one location, three blocks from the main station near 16th and V, in the lower outskirts of CH, and probably won't help much except keep the mostly safe park slightly safer.
Please remind me again why having police on foot/bicycle/segway patrols doesn't help deter crime?
Wouldn't having a cop circle by this block 4x to 10x per day put a dent in these kids' idea of "fun"?
I think it's funny and sad how the government folks who lament crime in the neighborhoods (mayor's office, MPD, etc.) all immediately say that increasing police presence by getting the cops out of their patrol cars doesn't work.
I used to live on Fairmont and University. I had one roommate (rather flamboyantly gay) attacked by a large group of neighborhood yute on our doorstep.
I live around the corner now. The other day a group of four yute were trying to break into the Butler house . . . in broad daylight, whilst throwing rocks at the cars parked in the parking lot of our building. Called police, but they were gone by the time they got there.
Not sure if these were kids from the same group or not.
Until D.C. spends more money on its Parks and Rec facilities to keep them open later at night and until places like the Boys & Girls Club stop trying to sell their properties to the highest bidder you are going to have teenagers with too much time on their hands and that always leads to problems.
I'm not saying that the parents/guardians of these young people shouldn't be held accountable for some of their actions because they cetainly should, but until this city makes its young people a priority we're going to continue to have problems such as the one reported.
Simply because many of the "gentrifiers" don't have kids (single, gay, young, whatever) doesn't mean that the well-being of the children who do live in this city (because really, unlike the gentrifiers, they don't have an option of where to live)shouldn't be a top priority for EVERYONE.
This is an old and very sad topic. I don't have the heart for it.
I've pulled unsupervised children out of a burning house, fixed broken bicycles, helped organize and served at neighborhood cookouts, paid local kids to cut grass and water street trees, patched bullet holes and cleaned "RIP" graffiti at an elementary school, ad hoc babysat, woven daisy-chains for the little girls, and opened my son's kiddie pool to neighborhood kids.
I've also directly intervened in inter-racial and same-race violence, called MPD hundreds of times, cleaned parks and vacant lots of drug residue, and gotten involved with CFS and DCHA and the DCAG.
Pointing fingers only takes the conversation so far. My advice, for better or worse, is to be part of the neighborhood in all facets.
The kids do this because they know they won't ever be punished, by either their parents or the police. When I was mugged in Columbia Heights by three kids who couldn't have been older than 15, the officer who took my report told me (I'm paraphrasing): "Even if we catch them, it won't do anything because they'll be out by tomorrow without any charges filed. If you're younger than 18, you have to pull some serious felonies to get punished in this city." The kids know this, and take advantage of it.
nice points Mark. well said.
Okay, former 13th and Florida resident here and I can say this is classic Clifton Street/Terrace behavior. Their other favorite sport is hucking rocks at those pretty glass vestibule doors and running. You just avoid that block and plan your route accordingly. Otherwise, if you're the wrong color/sexual preference, that's the treatment you can look forward to. This is the same area the Fruit of Islam came to with baseball bats to "pursuade" the dealers to embrace Islam.
And Anthony's hit it on the head. They do it because they can and because there are no consequences. Why do you think dealers use kids under 18 as their runners? Zero repercussions. They are out on the street within minutes of the cops nabbing them, if that ever happens at all. More cops wont fix this, much as I'd like to see every block in town get its own bike cop. Kinda gets expensive after a while.
"There's a lot going on in this letter, to be sure. Assault, racial tension, gentrification, unsupervised children, and if you tend to read the word "partner" and assume we're probably talking about a gay couple, then add a potential hate crime element into the mix."
Would it not be a hate crime if the kids attacked them merely because they're white?
SY, what are "yute"?
last week I had a conversation with my babysitter as I drove her home to her parent's house in Columbia Heights...
she is spiteful about how the new comers to the neighborhood are forcing her friends to move away
it was a long difficult conversation...
the words gentrification came up
but I think neighborhood evolution is more accurate
gwadzilla.blogspot.com
I'm moving back to DC this summer and am seriously thinking about buying a weapon for when I walk around the neighborhood. These kids attack us because they know we won't fight back.
I'm just amazed at the number of people who move into neighborhoods like Columbia Heights and then are shocked- SHOCKED!- at the reception they get from the "black neighbors who have lived there a while."
Don't get me wrong- I'd like to see those kids punished for the assault.
But give me a break. I mean, I tend not to buy condos in neighborhoods I'm not familiar with. That would make me a big giant moron.
So it's hard to sympathize. The author of the letter doesn't seem capable of considering WHY his black neighbors might harbor some animosity towards them.
I'll give you a hint, buddy- some long-term neighbors of theirs were likely forced from their home to make room for your fabulous condo. That's why. How would you feel?
CH_resident, I find your attitude even more disgusting than the letter-writer's. Your sense of entitlement astounds me.
That neighborhood was what it was long before you got there; if you didn't like the neighborhood you should have stayed the hell away from it. You don't get to move in and then complain about the way it was before you arrived.
And the fact that you're not only okay with, but anxious to see people forced from their own neighborhoods so that the crime won't be in your backyard anymore is appalling. Just move to Vienna and complain about, I dunno, the neighbor's tree being too close to your property line.
Oh and Mark, those were very good and useful points you made. Thanks.
What I worry about is the day these kids mess with the wrong person, who ends up seriously hurting them. I know personally, I tell myself that if I am attacked, and it looks like I can retaliate successfully (i.e. me against a couple small kids), then I will do it, but then again, who knows how one will react in the moment. But I can see myself seriously hurting a kid who comes up to me and tried to hurt me for no reason. I refuse to be scared in my own neighborhood.
I'm moving back to DC this summer and am seriously thinking about buying a weapon for when I walk around the neighborhood.
Um, anybody considering carrying a concealed weapons should familiarize themselves with DC's laws. As in, you have to register that can of MACE with the police, carrying a steak knife is a felony, a Master padlock on your person is considered a "brass knuckle", etc.
However, ladies, I'm not aware of anyone being prosecuted for carrying a brick in their purse.
I truly believe that until we get tough on minors in the criminal justice system, that the enforcement aspect of these kinds of crimes is meaningless. The current laws basically lead you to the conclusion that minors can get away with pretty much anything, because they're 'learning' how to live life. What could be more educational than a day in a youth detention facility? Repeeat offenders get months, years, etc. Parents should also be held accountable when children cannot be. Who else, after all, is responsible for teaching their children what is right, and what is wrong. I'm sick of excuses.
I am *SO* glad I'm moving to downtown Silver Spring on June 15. DC can kiss my white gay tax revenue goodbye.
In my entire adult life I have never lived anywhere that wasn't a central city. But the kind of ghetto savagery that rages through DC is like nothing I've ever experienced in my life. And the generalized race hatred that permeates every facet of life in DC is just making me emotionally sick. I feel like this city is making me emotionally hard in ways that New York never did, and it's not worth it.
Not that you care, but let's see if we can shed a little light on the situation…
Now this isn’t an end all be all, as I am sure this is just the tip of the iceberg.
1st let me say, i don't condone any violence or assualts upon anyone and bad behaviour permeates race and class...
FYI, you ask an upwardly mobile black family what it is like to move into that posh gated community and i guarantee you, they will disclose, "racist assaults are alive and well there too..." i.e., this ain't a one way street.
I live in an expensive apt, and have been for several years now...how do you think i feel, when cops harass me for loitering on my own steps, or my white neighbours constantly confuse me for the only other black person that lives in the building (despite the obvious complexion and height difference)
O.K., ready?
Black perspective: Impoverished, disenfranchised, under-educated, poor health care options, criminal environment...nobody has given a rats ass about this city for the past 40 years. My family and friends, who have been stuck here, have now created a home and community, which we love. Three generations of my family have lived and died in this city. Whenever my friends and I go to Gtown or outside of the district (MD/NOVA), we get harassed, pulled over, racially profiled, and encounter bigoted white people. We only know the bigots, because they always make themselves known to us. Now my family and friends are being FORCED OUT, by twenty something latte sipping flip flop wearing whites, who although are not overtly racist to me, are completely oblivious and careless of me and my community (which have been here longer than you will probably stay in this city). These same white people move into my neighbourhood, but don't respect me, speak to me, or look at me when they approach me on the street. They still look down upon us as second class citizens, even now in the sanctuary of my own block. We pass each other in the grocery every week, and the quite obvious "I’m white and not comfortable with you black people" aura is still dripping all over you. I might throw out a "hello" just to see if you respond...you don't. You listen to rap, hip hop, house, jazz, blues, etc... but fake on the diversity front. When another white household moves onto the block, I see you inviting them over, engaging with them...where and when did you think to not engage us with the same neighbourly fashion, or are we not worthy in your eyes? I get it, you two are in "this" together. You have options to you that I can't even fathom, at 28 you are already more wealthy than my entire family, and somehow you still think this is a just and fair society. Gentrification is segregation. You are ignorant
White Perspective: I'm not racist, it is economics. Man, I didn't know d.c. was a denizen of black folks, no wonder I got this property cheap. I know black people, but these aren't like the ones from the upper middle class community I am from, so it is ok to ignore and belittle them. I am hip to their culture, I’ve got the cd collection to prove it. I didn't own slaves, nor do I believe there is a fallout from the segregated history of this country, and I am completely not interested in their issues, after all I have trees to save. Black people are scary. Now that this is MY HOME, I am going to make some changes to the community to suit myself, fuck the looooong history of the demographics, shops, churches, restaurants, barbers, establishments, etc,... that were here before me. If they can't afford to be my neighbours fuck em. These people have every opportunity in the world to be more like me...THEY CHOOSE NOT TO BE, fuck em. In fact sometimes, it pisses me off that they scold the opportunity to be more like me. Gentrification is not a bad word. Racism is dead. You are ignorant.
Mix the above in a stew of heat, humidity, and general DC bullshit...simmer and what do you get...
Also, a caveat: If you move into a God forsaken ghetto, don't be surprised when ghetto shit happens to you...and before we get the Gay Brigade involved, you should know that D.C. has one of the largest populations gay blacks (at least that i have ever encountered from my jaunts around the world)...heck, Gay Black Pride is being held here all next week or something...
Finally, it should be noted, that these are apparently kids, not all Blacks in general. Believe it or not, most blacks have the where with all and maturity to not behave in such behavior.....oh, you got it, their black parents are telling them to haze the white folk. Brilliant.
Oblivious, should that same argument be made for white people hating black people who move into their neighborhood and "bring property values down"?
Kids are shit and scum, no matter what color their skin is.
I'd recommend getting a big fucking dog, it works pretty well for me.
I second the "big fucking dog" security method, with the addendum of a nice BFD that barks loud (Great Dane) but doesn't eat the neighbors (Pit Bull).
JM!
Now you're talking.
Buy a goddamn knife people. A big ass one.
You win. I'm leaving. Last fall one of my roommates was beaten savagely in front of the boys and girls club and on Saturday my sister's boyfriend was beaten and robbed at 12th and U. In between we've had rocks thrown at us, bottles thrown at us, our female friends have been jawed at and groped. In the last year, there have been promises of more police presence and action from the Boys and Girls Club but nothing happens. The same 50 or so thugs rule the streets with fear and violence.
But's ok right? Because I'm white, I should have stayed in NoVa. I should live in Woodley. I shouldn't show my face around here. Guess what, had I decided to stay in NoVa or lived in Woodley many people on this forum (Rich Black Kid) would have derided me as racist, fearful and cowering among "my own."
I've spent the last 5 years working on behalf of the African-American community in voter empowerment projects across the southeast. I've gone door to door in some of the poorest neighborhoods in the country. In pre-Katrina New Orleans, in Columbia, SC, in Memphis. I've knocked on doors when there were no doors. I've tried my best to help my fellow Americans gain political power. I've spent a lot of time in AME church basements, black barber shops and on the street corner. No matter what the neighborhood, city or state, I've never felt as unsafe as I do walking down my own street after dark.
But none of that matters. I'm white. I should shut up. Take the beatings or get out, right Rick Black Kid?
In the 2 years I have lived in DC (Shaw) I have experianced reverse discrimination 3 times by an African America - one lady even called me "the white devil" because I asked her politely to move her car from blocking my car in. I was parked in my legal spot from the alley, she was parking IN the alley. The one that scares me the most is when there was a serious car crash and a group of African Americans ran over to the cars all excited about it - not one person calling 911 - yelling "cracker down", and "whitey hurt". After I got off the phone with 911 I said to the adults in the group how appaulled I was and promptly told to shut the f up.
Bottom line, DC is dangerous for white people. Living here has made me reverse my point of view - I now see things more like my grand-parents, meaning maybe segragation is better. I'm leaving as soon as I can (need to do some work to get house on the market).
Oblivious: first off, if you read my post instead of being "oblivious" yourself, you would see that I said that people moving out due to property values is something that some would say MIGHT happen, but police need to do something about the crime problem NOW. I'm simply saying that the attitude needs to be on fixing the current crime problem, not adopting a "wait and see" attitude.
Second, I for one am not looking for a homogenous community with nothing but white people. Hence I moved into the city. But I do not expect to come to a neighborhood and be attacked. No one wants that, nor should anyone "expect" that.
I am a twenty-something white male who moved to Shaw about two years ago from the west coast to go to graduate school in Washington (i.e., I'm the kind of person who I think Rich Black Kid and oblivious are taking about).
Why did I move to DC and in particular to Shaw? It's simple, really: it's an area of the city where I could afford to rent an apartment while still being fairly close to my school. I wanted to live and go to school in close proximity so I didn't have to deal with long commutes and feeling like a permanent stranger in one or both communities (I would be out of place either at home or school). Frankly, there are not very many places in this city where I could afford to rent an apartment, feel safe in my neighborhood, and be close to school. Shaw was one of those places.
I get very frustrated when people who have lived in the neighborhood for longer than I have tell me that I am not allowed to voice opinions about the neighborhood or in any way change the feel of the neighborhood because I'm not from here (and for that matter because in all likelihood, I won't stay here after I graduate in a few more years). I am every bit as much of a resident of this community as a person who has lived here their whole life. I am not more valuable to the community than that person, but neither am I less valuable. I believe that I contribute in a positive way to the area--I patronize area businesses (some that have been here for decades and some that have been here for weeks). I say hello to people walking down the street (and get a lot of people looking at me like I'm crazy--I guess greeting people is a west coast thing, but that's another blog...).
Over and over again, people like me are decried as "newcomers" by people who have lived here for a long time. It's seen as a terrible insult by the people who use the term, but I have a hard time seeing why. Yes, I am a newcomer, but if I'm willing to contribute my energy, talents, any money to the neighborhood, why is my contribution any less valuable than a person who has lived here for thirty years? If I have ideas about how to make my neighborhood a better place, even if it will change some aspect of the neighborhood, why should my position be rejected out of hand? "Newcomers" can bring new ideas and new solutions to problems that exist in the neighborhood.
Neighborhoods change. It happens everywhere. In Los Angeles, where I lived before moving here, areas of the city that have been known as black areas of the city have lately become home to many Latinos. A lot of the same tensions that I find here also exist there, even though the groups involved are different.
I believe that if we tell people that all neighborhoods must forever stay the way they are, we will ultimately end up hurting everyone. Few people would argue that most of Washington (and most other American cities) are de facto segregated. In Washington, white people live in northwest and black people live in southeast, or at least that's the common perception. The only way we'll ever change that is if white people move into historically black neighborhoods and black people move into historically white neighborhoods with none of the "it has to stay this way" attitude.
In Washington, white people who live in northwest and do not want black people to move in are shunned as racists, yet oftentimes, black people who live in other parts of the city and don't want white people to move in are given a free pass. I do not see why a distinction should be made.
Shaw is an area that has a racial make up (and largely, a socioeconomic make up) that is fairly reflective of Washington as a whole. It is a great opportunity to show other areas of the city that people from a variety of backgrounds can live together in harmony. That means that white people would have to accept that Shaw will never be Loudoun county with box stores and chain restaurants, and black people would have to accept that opening up restaurants or stores that are owned by or patronized by white people does not make their contribution to the neighborhood any less valuable. If it's not possible to live together with some give and take, it makes me very pessimistic about the future of race relations in this country.
Why not volunteer as a tutor in your neighborhood. It's good for the kids, and your investment in the human capital and potential of the neighborhood will make you part of the local social system. You won't be some stranger who lives in the old Williams place, you will be Natasha's tutor. And nobody is gonna treat little Natasha's tutor bad; they know she and her family will not stand for it.
RBK - Wow! Your post read more like poetry than anything else; textured, vibrant, and real.
Bravo, I look forward to hearing from you again.
Oblivious: Exactly how are blacks being forced from their homes? Please, be specific.
As usual, monkeyerotica brings sense and actual information to the issue. It's shocking how some people here are willing to ignore the simple fact that the safety and welfare of law-abiding citizens is being threatened by unsupervised teenagers.
This is indeed classic Clifton Street/Terrace behavior, with some of the kids graduating from their little juvenile pseudo-gangs up to more real crap connected to the Euclid drug mart and other venues of higher education. But this assault crap barely rates above quality of life issues, and the cops could make those blocks safe in three weeks, if they would just patrol seriously. This isn't an organized economic situation where the crime would move elsewhere.
And lest the above silly commenters insist on painting this as some sort of old/new or gentrifier/non-gentrifier battle, let me point out that, as is all too often the case, the behavior of the delinquints has the largest effect on other kids in the neighborhood, who have to try to grow up straight in a nasty culture where those who succeed are pegged as failures. It's the same problem that you see constantly in failing schools--20% of the children prevent the other 80% from learning, and in the end, the decent teenagers (a group including, no doubt, certain of the current delinquints) that bear the brunt of the culture. So why not clean up the block and establish rule of law, even if you can't create respect for it?
By the way, the notion that the Boy & Girls Club can somehow solve this is silly. All those kids already use the club, and the kids nonetheless are what they are. You can't solve their problems with municipal program, but in this limited case, you just might be able to end the silly crimes going on in this area.
I'm probably oversimplifying, but I really do think that this limited problem (in the area right around Clifton St.) can be solved. It's probably like thirty teenagers, at most, causing all this trouble, if that. Whether it's worth dedicating the resources is, I suppose a close question, but all the comments here suggest that it's worth the effort.
I can understand why communities that are forced to change by incoming white people of a higher economic class are frustrated by the changes. However, the territoriality is absurd. Just because you weren't born in DC (or in Shaw, or wherever) doesn't mean you should forbidden from moving there.
Um, Clifton, read much? From where in my post do you derive that i would think you racist or anything for living where you want to live and or speaking up about issues affecting you? If you care to re-read my post, it clearly states what some of the sentiments are behind the disconnect of WHITES and BLACKS in the city.
I never once suggested that someone move or not move...except in the instance where they move into a Ghetto...now if you chose to move into a ghetto (even i, as a black male would not move into a ghetto) and ghetto shit happens to you, don't be surprised. But please, i encourage you to re-read my post before you attempt to reply and falsely characterize me more.
If anything, i suggested we take time out and try to appreciate this issue from all sides exposing the ignorance on both sides...are you game, or are you going to bark some more up the wrong tree?
And i know i am dealing with an idiot in you, because i said i don't condone violence, assaults, or the beatings of anyone...don't get salty at me, because i sound reasonable to you and you don't know how to get along in your community.
Basically, like i said, your response is not in comport with the language of my post. Sorry, better luck next time.
It's reverse White Flight people; it didn't go over well the first time, it's definitely not going to the second.
I don't know why you all are still debating this shit, Mark already answered the question.
"Pointing fingers only takes the conversation so far. My advice, for better or worse, is to be part of the neighborhood in all facets."
So instead of instigating each other and telling our sad stories, why don't we try to find information on community involvement websites or meetups.
Redneck: "I don't condone segregated schools, but ..."
Chauvinist: "I don't condone rape, but ..."
RBK: "I don't condone violence against white people who move into Columbia Heights, but ..."
i had rocks thrown at me by some kids while biking on 11th st north of U st. it's no fun. they honestly are untouchable.
All of you who think this is a gentrification issue solely should read the crime report Saturday and Sunday morning. I can guarantee you there will be some black kids and elders getting shot by other black kids and elders. This environment doesn't turn on and off in accordance to race. One of the saddest reports I ever read was a charitable black veteran killed by another black man he befriended from work and even gave shoes to. That's not a community folks. And to "oblivious" who says people shouldn't move in somewhere they don't know anything about, welcome to America son--where are you from? And another thing, if it's not a condo you want, maybe a baseball field or office conglomeration with security, cameras and gates will fit better because that land is valuable and will be bought and sold. I don't like it because I can't afford it either. And to my white neighbors who have youth with guns running through their yards shooting at one another, it's alright. That's community--don't interfere because you obviously wouldn't understand. And another thing, I agree with you Rick Black Kid. There's a lot of rich white people I can't stand. There's some kind of pecking order. If you weren't there, it would fall onto someone else in the building of either different economics or orientation but race doesn't always play a role. For some reason people do this. I don't know why but if you make a lot of money and have some time, it's important for others to know this, acknowledge it or what's the point? There are video's that show this almost exclusively--it's called rap. My mom used to get it pecked at the country club she worked. It would be nice if people can get along but I don't have high expectations from a society that throws rocks for fun and shoots to resolve differences. And by society, I mean everyone. Mark, you're right on but if you think that ignorance will leave you alone because you perform community service, you're wrong. It helps and is a necessity or you don't exist. But by definition of victim, the recipient never saw it coming unless you're Jesus or trying to be.
Clifton, you really aren't that good at this are you?
I suggest, if you are going to quote me, you take an actual quote...like this one
"1st let me say, i don't condone any violence or assualts upon anyone and bad behaviour permeates race and class..."
that's funny, no mention of CoHi at all, ...hell, i don't think i mention any particular neighbourhood in regards to this issue...oh, oh, wait, yeah i see it right there...i do mention Gtown...sorry.
further, despite all of the muck, on this site, there seems to be a general consesnsus as to what is prudent and what is inflammatory or racist...
you are the only one to have read my post, had the opportunity to post, posted, and cried racism...
which to me says one thing...we know who the jackass in the room is.
so now, i have delivered to you my quote, CUT AND PASTED directly from my posting... which i might add, reads nothing like the contrived b.s. you suggested i displayed.
why is this so hard for you to get?
I think we should just outlaw rocks from DC. I am not racist but I think rocks are the real problem here.
RBK: Actually, Clifton isn't the only one that thought your post was racist.
I did.
And probably a lot of others did. Your characterization of the 'white perspective' was stunningly narrow-minded and racist. Especially since you applied it to all white people.
And exactly how are your family and friends being forced out by 20-something latte-sipping whites (yet another stereotype)? Please, be specific.
I apologize RBK. By "ghetto" you clearly meant Georgetown, not Columbia Heights which is the neighborhood this posting referred to. My bad, dude, my bad. Again, you win.
Article title: "Rock Throwing, Attacks in Columbia Heights Return"
RBK: "that's funny, no mention of CoHi at all"
I read RBK's "blakc perspective" and thought "well, this is interesting, maybe this guy really gets all facets of the situation here."
Then I read his "white perspective" and realized he didn't have much interesting to say at all.
Rich Black Kid, while I was not prepared to call your post racist (it isn't even the most inflammatory comment associated with this post), I do take issue with your suggestion that you are simply suggesting that we all
It seems obvious after reading your "black perspective/white perspective there there is a steep bias in your words, so to suggest that you are the middle ground is somewhat deceptive. Specifically, I'm referring to the difference in tone between this:
And this:
One starts off stating a very real situation and is written with a sympathetic voice. The other is obviously dripping with biting sarcasm and mean-spiritedness. That doesn't strike me as an attempt to expose the ignorance or hypocrisies on both sides.
I live around 13th and Clifton. I'm white, I'm constantly walking around, and while I wouldn't call the neighborhood "safe," I also don't get harassed for my race. I'm female, and I've been bothered a few times for wearing certain clothes, but I've seen black women harassed for that, too. I feel like most of the posts make it sound like you can't walk down the street if you're white and not get things thrown at you -- which hasn't been my experience. I also have several friends who are not only white, but also butch/trans, and who spend time in the neighborhood, and I don't believe they've been bothered, either.
As a licensed spelunker and troglodyte, I'm proud to say that I'm pro-rock and I vote! Outlawing rocks will only drive the rock-traffikers underground and create greater demand and price for illegal out-of-state rocks. Not to mention the easily-concealed "Saturday Night Special" dirt clods. Clearly, common-sense rock legislation is called for here. Who on the City Council will step forward with some bold legislation? How much longer will the streets run with blood and rubble before we have a Dangerous Controlled Igneous and Cretacious Substances Protection Act of 2007?
I am stunned. This is yet another post on DCist about "Black kids gone wild" and what the bulk of these comments end up being about is how racist one Black poster is. Fucking unreal!
Children? Children my butt, this is not the behavior of children, kids, whatever you want to call 'em. These are unfeeling sociopaths, lacking any remorse.
Mix the above in a stew of heat, humidity, and general DC bullshit...simmer and what do you get...
A comment thread on DCist?
yo i live on clifton--though i've never been attacked i've heard stories like these before. it's going to continue for a while, i feel, as the target complex and that whole area around tivoli square is finished, it will just bring more white people in which will intensify reverse racism. also on the northwest and northeast corners of florida and 14th there are some condo proposals, not to mention the destruction and rebuilding of the god-awful nehemiah center will add to the tension.
the whole area is about to take a big leap forward, but in the interim we're just going to have to live with taunts and the violence--unless anyone's really concerned about improving the quality of neighborhood life. the other option is to move--which is what i'm doing.
it's really a shame, though, because all the people i get on the bus with in the morning are friendly and responsive. it's just a bunch of hoodlums who are making life uncomfortable for some. what i find to be the most annoying is the kids who just throw their trash on the street--it's hard to feel sometimes like they just don't care about anything around them.
I don't know, RBK's "white perspective" sounded a lot like many of the comments on this site.
I don't think there's one white perspective or one black perspective, but I wouldn't say his post mischaracterized the dominant viewpoints in these debates either, at least based on what's happening on the blogs & message boards.
Admit it, monkey -
You're just thrilled you got to use the words "spelunker" and "troglodyte" in the same DCist post today.
Another rebuke on RBKs racism:
I knew there were lots of black people in DC when I moved here with my fiance...no big deal, we're all people.
I do not ignore nor belittle anyone.
I don't claim to be hip to anyone's culture, regardless of my supposed CD collection.
So there weren't very many black people people from my high school or college...so what.
Of course there is/was a fallout from segregation, and I understand the limited choices less fortunate people of all races have in this world.
Black people are not scary.
I love DCs looooooooooong history of black culture, if I wanted to live in a lame-ass white culture I'd have stayed in PA.
Gentrification is a bad word and racism is alive and well, you helped bring it back a little. You are ignorant.
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. would frown if he read your first post.
I don't think race is really the problem. The problem is children. Children suck. Seriously, I hate children... and puppies.
Actually, I wouldn't characterize RBK's post as racist. While his portrayal of the "white perspective" is kind of flippant and sarcastic, I have to say that, even as a white guy myself, I find the attitude of a LARGE segment of the white DC population to be so self-absorbed and arrogant that it's mindboggling. (Yes, rich dad in absurdly expensive Italian spandex bike clothes who almost mowed me down on the sidewalk yesterday while riding a tandem with little Madison, I'm talking about YOU.)
The issue here isn't about whose community is the most historically aggrieved. Everyone's pissed off - just be pissed off quietly and get on with your lives. The point is that random, violent assaults are being committed with crippling frequency in certain parts of DC, and neither the community itself nor the police seem able/willing to prevent that.
Where do I get my troglodyte license?!? If I wasn't stipid enough to qualify due to my prior DCist comment reading, I sure as hell am after this latest spree.
does anyone here work?
ROTFLMAO
I just saw HR's comment #56.
BEST. COMMENT. EVER.
Can someone put that in bronze and place it on the main page in a huge font, please?
I know, let's all claw our eyes out and then we really truly won't see race (bonus-less likely to actually hit someone with rock, egg, etc.) I know that's what I'm about to do, after reading this ongoing nonesense. It's called white privlege, people,wake up. Until all of us whities, whether we're honky crackers or well-meaning liberals, confront the reality of WP, we're gonna get hit by rocks, kicked in the groin, have our feelings hurt by graffitti. None of those are nice things to do someone. Neither is being so entitled that you can't even begin to address the CORE problem going on here. It's super complicated and even if you don't feel you are racist, even if you pat yourself on the back for moving into an "edgy" neighborhood with every intention of being a good neighbor, this cycle isn't gonna change without us white folk facing up. In a world of unearned privilege, the biggest privilege is to admit we've got it, but then to ignore what it means. In this case part of what it means the MAN can control the system but he CANNOT control how his neighbors feel about him moving in next door. Boo hoo. All white people have an obligation to understand the legacy of slavery and economic oppression that damages society to this day. Those are the rocks we throw, and we've been throwing them for years.
"does anyone here work?"
I'm a law student, natch.
It’s crazy but you have to understand that ever since I was little (which is twenty-something) the city of D.C. has been majority black and for “newcomers”(whites) to come into the city and try to make changes to their liking is uncalled for. How many of the “newcomers” know the history in the streets of D.C.? For example such as the riots that have happen, the murders and basically the culture with Go-Go music and urban clothing line. All these things have been molded by blacks that have lived in D.C. for many years. And with rising housing prices, it’s pushing blacks out of the community and in to other parts of Maryland and more whites are moving into the community of D.C. because they can afford the housing prices. Which brings new ideas and new solutions to problems that exist in the neighborhoods, but people who lived their before the whites moved in have been complaining for years and nothing has change. So for someone who has never lived in that community, come into the neighborhood demanding changes and accomplishing them is like a slap in the face. So, it’s more of what’s being lost rather than gaining that has me a little disturbed.
I live in Columbia Heights, and haven't been subjected to the rock-throwing personally. However, I do worry about those sorts of things, and I can relate to Graham's e-mail-er in that I worry about ratting out local kids for fear of getting their angst turned on me. Local kids smashed my neighbors window while I was standing right in my front yard. A call to the cops didn't result in much satisfaction. They told me I couldn't press charges since it wasn't my house (neighbors not home at the time) and that the kids wouldn't get in much trouble anyway, since DC's juvi laws are so weak. Great!
I moved to CH, knowing that is wasn't suburbia. I didn't want suburbia. I expected that I could integrate into the neighborhood just as I have into any other - by being friendly to neighbors, cleaning up garbage, etc. A few folks on my block say Hi to me, but many more make sexist or racist comments when they see me in my yard, ignore my greetings, or throw garbage into my yard. I'm not asking for perfection - I'm asking for civility.
I realize some folks might be mad about the neighborhood changing, but change is inevitable, unless you want to put up a big wall and forbid people to enter or leave. Now, that's freedom!
For what it's worth, last thurs 5/24 @ 930PM I was riding my scooter north on 15th, by the park and just south of Euclid. 3 or 4 young black males assaulted me while I was trying to ride by. One played chicken with me to slow me down, then grabbed my arm while someone I didnt see hit me on the head from behind. I managed a serious kick in the balls to the first one as I got away. I kept thinking they were really lucky I wasnt someone willing and able to kill them. One of them is injured. But they could have killed me. I'll ride with a U-lock ready from now on.
My husband and I are white and just bought a house in Columbia Heights. The first thing we did was GET TO KNOW our new neighbors and we are planning an open house for the block. In the one month that we've lived here we've loved it specifically because our neighbors are so wonderful.
I work in online publishing, it's a slow day. Besides it doesn't take all day to sift through this bullplop.
Well, being black myself i guess i should have labeled the whole thing Black Perspective...
but to that i can say, that, i find the issue here is not one of overt racism, just one of misunderstanding on both sides. And since i failed to limit my remarks to CoHi, i guess that makes me as irrelevant as those who convey their stories of living in Shaw or Logan... and further, i said (why can't you get the full context) these are some of the sentiments...NOT ALL, as i am sure this is the tip of the ice berg...i did qualify and quantify all of my statements...
of course even in the BP, there just may be some overt idiotic racist viewpoints as well as with the WP...
but what i find most, which i was trying to convey, is that both sides of this issue have misinformation of the other...and you're right ...my post is all the black perspective with experience and conversation with both sides of this issue (sorry, should have been more explicit in that)...but one doesn't grow up and live in a upper middle class white community, work with, LIVE with, people of other races and not pick up on their sentimentalities...(kinda like being the only black guy in a sitcom) human nature is not hard to read or easy to conceal.
And then trevor, i implore you to educate me...as to the White Perspective on this issue.
But from what i get on this site, living here everyday in this city, there is a heavy "us" and "them" undertone.
in hindsight, for which i do apologize, it is unfounded and absurd to claim anything white as i am far from.
and Hillman, good Lord, i was not speaking for myself when i was speaking of displacement but that is my point, a lot of people who look at this issue will not see further beyond the immediate, moving of a black family because they can no longer afford the taxes and there upon a white family moving in as displacement...
i was merely postulating perspective, not my own experience, but alas, perhaps i was a bit too ambitious in my prose.
I agree w/Dr. Racism. Let's use this forum as a way to brainstorm on what we can do as community members to address the teen gang issues that are going on and to better understand the racial/socioeconomic/political tensions that are underlying it.
There's a lot of entitlement from all sides of the coin when in comes to "gentrification" - but lets keep in mind that neither side's right to a good, safe, affordable, convenient place to live is greater than the others'.
When a neighborhood is a community, neighbors look out for one another. That doesn't eliminate all crime, but it does help to prevent some and prevent escalation. So instead of sniping, let's bring this forum back to a positive discussion on how to help our tense, mixed neighborhood communities adjust to the changes w/in them in an inclusive way.
Interestingly enough, I think that it's the arrogant, rich white folks who get their money from daddy that cram neighborhoods like Georgetown and Dupont Circle, and would never in a million years live in a neigborhood like Columbia Heights. My experience is that the people who move into these gentrifying neighborhoods do so not just because of the slightly lower property values (they could just as easily move to NoVa), but because they are open minded, don't buy into the racism hype, and actually relish the diversity and unique environment. I also think they are more predominantly self-sufficient and hardworking, and thus more involved in their neighborhood communities and investing efforts for the long haul. Yet these are precisely the people who are most open to the racism and ill-treatment of longstanding residents. Acknowledged that this is a tough issue on both sides, but it's hard to feel sympathy when all I've seen from the 'gentrifiers' is a willingness to be involved and participate in the community. The property values argument is insanity based on ignorance. Property development companies deal with those issues. The rest of us just live our lives the best way we can.
If these were skinheads throwing rocks at black people what the reaction be?
New Rule: White people must stop making up stupid acronymns for their neighborhoods. The next person who refers to Columbia Heights as CoHi just might actually deserve to get a rock thrown at them. This doesn't make your neighborhood trendier or you look hipper. It simply shows how lame you really are.
And yes, I am white.
YOU PEOPLE ARE INSANE. When people get physically assaulted, we should protect them. All the navel-gazing and historical blaming beyond that simple point is bullshit. I might put up with it if people were developing concrete solutions, but instead it's all the usual nonspecific, apologist crap. You're doing nothing but propagating a situation where children's lives are wasted and innocent people get hurt.
I'm back off DCist. See you all in a few months. Sensible people, hold down the fort. More power to you.
CDTrave, you have a point. The really obnoxious rich white people wouldn't be caught dead east of 16th St.
Sorry TMS(acronym?), I just like to type fast and get my thoughts out there before the topic changes and I look like the guy who is talking about 5 minutes ago. Now spell out your goddamn name before I kill you.
Good point Sweet. Except when you talk about concrete solutions as the answer, I don't see how not reading the DCist is going to make the message threads any better. Why don't you police these things or vie for a spot on the staff.
I am black. I don't think you can talk in absolutes in the social sciences. No rational person would say "all blacks this", "all women that", "all whites etc"..but the common sense conventional generalizations about black inner city teenagers are ignored at your own peril. The types of people that "gentrify" are not the heartland blue collars and farmers. They are usually the most genteel, non-aggressive effetes of society, interfacing with the most aggressive NON-rational types of society. Watch the sparks fly.
I'm with TMS, please lose the lame acronyms for Columbia Heights.
to Kai--interesting how you bring up "culture" and murder and riots all in one sentence. Since when is murder, and random violence "culture" ?
What the hell is wrong with moving in and demanding more police patrols? And yeah, I live on fairmont, I live in "workforce" housing and we we are ready to sue Faircliff apts where this happened. They have non-stop trouble there. I would like to say the parents are busy at work but in fact, I see plenty of adults sitting around in the parking lot watching, but not giving a shit, what the kids do. But maybe I am most pissed off at the rich white woman who owns that apartment complex and probably lives in Bethesda. I'll restrain myself here and not publish her name, email and phone number.
The sad thing is that one day, very soon, somebody is going to lose their cool, strike back, and some brat kid is going to get hurt or worse. Then all hell will break loose.
Sounds like a bunch of elitists are upset that the gates of the country club are now open to all.
"CDTrave, you have a point. The really obnoxious rich white people wouldn't be caught dead east of 16th St."
With all the raced-based beatings, who would want stay away?
These are the types of comments that make me indifferent to the not-so-random hipster assaults. I know it is hard for some of you to believe but not everyone will like you no matter how much you appease them or try to fit in. Deal with it.
I wanted to share some of my thoughts on why there is so much animosity from blacks towards whites in DC. I am a middle class Black man. I was born in the District and have lived here my whole life except when I left to go to college. However, no matter how long I've been here, no matter how many degrees I have or how "well-spoken" I am, I am still treated like an outsider and second-class citizen by Whites and others living in this city. When people consistantly refuse to treat you as a human being on their same level, it will result in animosity.
Just for full disclosure's sake, the Jason at #84 is not me, the pissed off gay guy moving to Silver Spring.
As you were.
RBK "moving of a black family because they can no longer afford the taxes and there upon a white family moving in as displacement..."
I am so tired of hearing about people getting displaced while they just walked away with half a mill for some run down house that needs another half mill to bring it to modern standards ... Cry me a river all the way to the bank!!
If these were skinheads throwing rocks at black people what the reaction be?
Take them bowling?
Not the Red Baron--That's BS!! Form there you make the leap to justifying ROCK THROWING! As if these hooligans were otherwise rational people...
Not the Red Baron--That's BS!! From there you make the leap to justifying ROCK THROWING! As if these hooligans were otherwise rational people...
"When people consistantly refuse to treat you as a human being on their same level, it will result in animosity."
As opposed to having kids that punch you in the junk and laugh about it. That breeds sheer joy.
Chris Lee- I am not justifying the actions of the Rock Throwers. I am just getting at the larger issue of animosity between whites and blacks.
"When people consistantly refuse to treat you as a human being on their same level, it will result in animosity."
Is animosity ending in violence really so predictable? I've been run off the road numerous times by cars while riding my bike, but I've never thrown rocks or a u lock at a car.
I think you are getting at the "smaller issue" of your own experience. I would like to follow you through your day and SEE you treated like a "second class" citizen.
c'mon 100 posts!
seriously though, i don't know that i can add much to this other than to say i'm white, i've lived on u street, in logan, and in bloomingdale. i read the crime reports, and i know where the hotspots are (15th to 13th, clifton up to columbia, can be a land-mine strewn area). it's interesting to watch as some of the hotspots cool down and other ones heat up.
i've never been personally physically assaulted, and i don't live in fear of that in my travels all over the 3rd PD. i have had a former house broken into though, so that's my experience with crime in DC. in the end, i try to say hello and talk to neighbors, whether they're black or white, gay or straight (and THANK GOD that everyone fits into those frames, otherwise i'd get confused). some people are friendly, others are not. i've only been called the equivalent of white devil once, so i guess i'm doing pretty good on that front.
I'm astounded by some of these comments. I believe the e-mails being circulated by Graham about rock throwing on 14th St. are mine. The fact of the matter is that this is not a race issue.
The building in which I live is inhabited by people of various races, ages, sexual preferences, and economic situations. I have lived in the area for years. I rent there because the buiding is nice, the neighborhood is pretty, and the rents are affordable. Mine is probably one of the least expensive buildings on the block.
The reason my building is so often attacked is because it is really close to the Boys and Girls Club and has an alley running along two sides. My concern is the failure of police to send a message to delinquents and to protect the community as a whole. I volunteer and consider myself an active citizen. I'm just as invested as anyone else. But the local kids are violent, unsupervised, and spoiled (yes, poor kids can be spoiled, too). The only ones putting the concept of gentrification out there are the self-hating upper-middle-classers who accept responsibility as an extension of entitlement. These kids aren't lashing out against whitey -- at eight to twelve years old, they don't know who whitey is or where whitey lives. They're simply fucking shit up for a laugh.
Frankly, the mention of "expecting ghetto-ass behavior in ghetto-ass neighborhoods" is ridiculous. Meridian Hill and Columbia Heights are certainly NOT the ghettos of Washington, D.C.
Am I poster 100?
Let's see:
1) Rarely being able to get a cab in my neighborhood unless I'm accompanied by a White friend.
2) Routinely ignored in shops while the staff jump at the chance to provide assistance to White customers.
3) Trying to visit an antique shop in Georgetown (the type where the door is locked and you must ring the doorbell to be let in) and being refused service by the White shop owner.
4) Walking into the lobby of the Mayflower hotel and bening asked (I'm not kidding) to carry someones luggage to their room. I assure, had I been white that would not have happened.
5) My White neighbors refusing to acknowledge me when I greet them.
Chris Lee, I could go on but it is obvious that you are completely ignorant to the fact that race is something that Black people have to deal with on a daily basis. A big part of White Privilage is never having to think about race.
dang it..I missed being 100 :(..Anyway, Ryan, you are in denial. Many of these teenagers use race to justify aggressive behaviour.
It's not that I don't believe that these incidents don't happen, but I'm always a little stunned when I hear about them, because nothing like this has ever happened to anyone I know. I lived in Columbia Heights for 4 years, Shaw for 2 and now I've been in Petworth for 1 year. I am a white female, but have never been the victim of crime, harassment or anything else--I walk just about everywhere (no car), and I've never had a problem outside of some kid once calling me "snowflake" which at the time struck me as hilarious, and the two of us ended up laughing together over it. I have one friend who has been mugged, and one acquaintance whose car was broken into...but other than that I have never experienced ANYTHING of this nature. Am I just that lucky? Or is the incidence of these activities somewhat overblown/isolated to certain blocks that I generally avoid? I mean, seven years and nothing? I guess I should be waiting for anvils to hit me in the head!
Seriously though--I think there's a lot to be said for getting to know your neighbors and their families. I've lived near some kids who occasionally got into trouble, but they wouldn't dare do a thing to me (or let their friends) because they knew I'd tell their mother. Involvement in the community can be time consuming, but it is also incredibly rewarding. Why would you move into a neighborhood if you aren't interested in being anyone's neighbor?
It's interesting to me as someone who has lived in Columbia Heights for 5 years that everyone in this whole lists is acting like there are just black and white people in the neighborhood. No one mentions that there are a ton of Latino/as who are here too. Some are victims of crime by African Americans too. Are they responsible? When a Latino family buys a house and displaces a black family is that bad? Or not as bad? Or worse? It's interesting to me because by throwing in a third community into discussions it makes the whole black/white and race/class discussion much harder to have, right? So, we'll just pretend that there aren't Latinos here. Or that there is also a Latino gang problem that doesn't get mentioned at all either. Hmmm..
Also, what I find interesting in my street in Columbia Heights, the African American families that have sold their houses didn't do so because they couldn't afford the costs anymore, they sold their houses because the were really old. They then moved out to PG county where all of their kids are. The middle class African American kids of the middle class African American parents who made up Columbia Heights for the past 60 years don't want to live here.
I, however, do want to live here. And know all of these facts above because I talk to all of my neighbors--black, white and hispanic.
1. I can get
2-5. If you are as degreed as you say, I'd have to investigate. Out of curiosity do you walk around town "thugged out" or dressed in Lacoste Tshirt with Calvin Klein penny loafers?
chris lee: in dc just about everything is excused by bringing in race ... crime-parking and everything in between
I recently moved from Columbia Heights to Kingman Park in NE and I couldn't be happier. I say hello to my neighbors, they say hello to me. We let the local kids play in our yard with our dog, they've helped us with our gardening. People generally have lived in the area a long time and the place is stable. Everyone knows each other's names. I never experienced that in Columbia Heights, or anywhere really in Northwest. Back there everyone is transient, planning on leaving in a couple years, nobody says hello on the street. The racial tension is serious, no doubt in large part from things like luxary condos, Targets and TGI Friday's opening up across the street from subsidized housing and projects. It's right there in front of everybody's face.
I don't really have much of a point here, other than the fact that Columbia Heights is a screwed up place, and I'm happy to be out of there and in a more long term, residential neighbhorhood in DC. And treating people, especially neighbors, with respect goes a long way.
No denial here. The little rock-throwing kids (think eight year-olds) I've encountered don't care for race. They're just looking for laughs. Plus, we're ignoring the fact that many of the rock-throwing incidents involve black people throwing rocks at other black people or throwing rocks at properties owned or inhabited by black people.
I can't wait until CoHi is gentrified to the point where all there are will be hipsters, Salvadorans and Ethiopians. Like it or not, the African-American population of DC, and especially the "bleeding edge areas" (i.e. Columbia Heights and Georgia Avenue) has a huge well of anger and resentment that they take out on whitey for being 'rich', the Salvadorans for 'taking' their jobs and the African migrants for just being foreign.
Until the black community in DC grows up a bit and learns to get along with everyone else, there will be problems. You can try to pin this on the 'newcomers' all you want, but there really isn't a huge undercurrent of white-hispanic and white-african tension that there is with the black community. Believe it or not, whitey can stomach African-American cultural norms. If we couldn't, we wouldn't be living in D.C..
Chris Lee: I have the most boring wardrobe imaginable. Khakis and button-down shirts.
Ryan- I get it you are trying to be nice. But the point is that for SOME black kids- even VERY young ones, as racially charged thinking is so deep and omnipresent, violent behaviour toward whites is often peer approved.
Not the red baron:
Statistically speaking, who's most likely to commit a crime in a Georgetown antique shop?
Assuming you're a law abiding citizen, you should be mad at people of your fellow race for creating those stereotypes. Kind of like how all muslims are perceived as terrorists or white country folks molest children.
Stereotypes exist for a reason. Instead of getting mad at people who play the odds, get mad at people who create those odds.
I love it when white folk pull out the MLK card (kind of like the reverse Race Card)...
To the White Guy From CoHi, i believe my post would be the least of his issues. In fact, i think he may find it constructive to sit and read it and not respond so blindly to it...but then again, he was a pretty smart guy! He might inquire as to why one would think this way? He might inquire as to how we can change this outlook in the community. He would definitely take a strap (a belt, not a gun) to the butts of these ignorant kids/ criminals. But further, confront the ignorance of the whites in the neighbourhood as well. He wouldn't call me racist for trying to enlighten others as to what the foundation or roots of this issue are. I never said this is an absolute truth, just what is perceived. So hoorah, you are the lone ranger, but White guy, obviously, theren't aren't enough of your type to make your presence known or appreciatted, so instead you get thrown in with the rest of the pile. So don't get mad at me just because your shit doesn't stink, obviously, my conjecture would not be such if there weren't enough real life versions of these people out there on both sides. My mistake, which i admitted to, was to personify the white side of the issue and which i recognize i shouldn't have done...but that doesn't change the fact that people still think and feel this way. Is it right? No.
And i think you missed a key phrase, from the Black perspective... alot of the encounters these youth have with white folks are unto them demeaning, belittling, classist, elitist, and/or racist. So unless you are walking around with a figurative sign on your neck saying, "i am down with the cause", they will not respect you, because as far as they know, it was your brother that pulled them over for DWB.
I have lived in this city for over a decade and have seen the changes...
Surprise, surprise, Blacks, most definitely males, live in fear in this city...fear from each other, fear from the system, fear from crooked cops, and yes, fear of white people. (think about it)
I am not apologizing for the behaviour of any criminal,(catch them, throw them in jail). i am merely trying to uncover the agnst that may drive some of these kids to have little or no respect for "newcomers" so everyone can stop acting like they are oblivious to what is going on. But forget that because i am racist...i will be sure to mention that to my white live-in gf of several years.
2-5. If you are as degreed as you say, I'd have to investigate. Out of curiosity do you walk around town "thugged out" or dressed in Lacoste Tshirt with Calvin Klein penny loafers?
Chris Lee - What difference does it make how he's dressed? This kind of shit happens no matter how you dress. I can tell you from my own experience I can be suited up and still have a waitress treat me like garbage because she assumes Black people don't tip.
Thankfully the one problem on the list I don't have is my White neighbors not speaking to me, all the folks on my block are pretty cool and pretty cool with each other regardless of race.
Once, I was kind enough to give some fine fellows the directions they asked for. They were kind enough to mace me in the face. The (black) cop who showed up to take my info told me they were probably looking for "a white guy in a suit." Sounds about right.
The racial tension in this town is unbearable. I'm sure gentrification is a huge part of it.
What am I supposed to do about that? I don't make a lot of money. I don't live in a condo. I don't even have a car. Yet, I have to take hits for all of the rich people tearing down old neighborhoods, just because I'm white? I can't even tell you how many times people have made racist comments to me in my SE neighborhood, which is one of the few places I can afford to live.
nottheredbaron- I am no apologist for the condition we live in in a post colonial society. It doesn't surprise me that ANY black man encounters some bias. But I would think that any rational person can process somebody being a jerk and ignoring them in a department store, or mistaking you for a bell-hop. There ARE a**holes in this world. Did it motivate you to go outside and through a rock at some white girl or did you tell the offender off?
Good point dc columbiaheights, there is a huge latino population in this area (they are both minority and majority) and no one has really touched upon the issue. Any takers? Cause I sure as shit ain't going near it.
I live in Columbia Heights, and haven't been subjected to anything scary. I make an effort to befriend the neighbor kids though and smile genuinely. I actually love where I live because I LOVE my neighbors.
some kids did, however, throw a big bucket of paint on my (african american) landlord's car because he wouldn't let them use his kids' basketball goal. they kept destroying the fence when they would use it. ruined his paint job. sucks.
just jerk kids with not enough to do.
ok. number one, this is not a RACE issue as much as it's a CLASS issue. Whenever you have groups of drastically different social classes living in the same area, there is going to be tension, and occasional violence, and all of that. This isn't just reasonable, it's EXPECTED! When you sign up to live in an area that has crime, you can't act surprised when the crime doesn't magically disappear around you.
number two, more police are necessary, for sure, but that's putting a band-aid on a major wound. The real solutions are long-term and public policy related - better SCHOOLS, better OPPORTUNITIES for these kids. better programs to supervise them. Part of the reason that this problem exists is that a lot of the people who move into columbia heights, etc aren't families, they're young, without children. They don't have the same long-term concerns as the families that have lived there for decades. So they scream for more police presence, which is a short term fix (granted for some, not all, I understand that some mid/upper class people have lived/plan to live in columbia heights etc for a long time). But spending more money on police means spending less money on schools etc so the problem never gets solved.
Columbia Heights is an area with a lot of contrast between subsidized public housing and "urban lofts with flair." I do agree with several things stated thus far-
1). There should be serious thought given to creating actual criminal consequences/penalties for crime. Assault with a deadly weapon (brick) does not merit a "do-over." People who own or rent in DC and pay for these kids' education and rec centers via direct or indirect property taxes should not have to be assualted by these kids. That said, prison or juvie isn't exactly going to sweeten the temperment of a kid and set them in with the right crowd.
2). The racist and homophobic aspects of the various incidents should not be brushed away. That said, these are all acts of teens, and many, if not most, teenagers are a$^&%oles, regardless of race or socioeconomic status. That's their job, and I challenge you to find a high school that doesn't have a clique of degenerate little jerks who antagonize people on the basis of the music they like, their sexual preference, or just cause they feel like it. These same kids nonetheless often turn out to be productive members of society in their later years. DC is no exception.
To wit: a pack of rich white kids in Arlington threw a firecracker at the open window of my car the other day while I was in it. Little bastards. Not as bad as a brick to the head, but the Arlington kids have more to lose. They've got their lacrosse scholarship or whatever and all those years of SAT tutoring to think of.
My two cents is that it is better to address the roots of the problem than to worry about catching people and grinding them through the criminal justice system. If you think of jail as a trade school/finishing school/networking opportunity, you'll get where I'm coming from.
There's a report on the MPD website on combating latino gang activity in Columbia Heights which addresses youth crime generally. The authors interviewed a lot of parents and youth in the area and gentrification concerns are discussed.
In addressing the gang problem, the report noted that many kids felt that crews are more common than gangs...just packs of friends who wander around and either paint tags or wander around looking for trouble. The report is about a year old, and was done for DC by a youth policy group from Michigan, but they did their homework and it seems relevant.
I like the following excerpt, which discusses how finding things for kids to do is part of the solution (jobs or rec centers):
"Youth also felt additional options were merited, especially for older youth (specifically those between the ages of 15 and 18). The following comments exemplify some of the strategies and desired alternatives as expressed by youth and parents:
Get younger people to join activities, summer school, work, not hang around in the streets. (male youth)
Build a big rec center where they [community youth] can all fit. Include basketball courts, weight rooms, gym. Things where everyone can fit in. Computer rooms, art rooms, tutoring. All that stuff. (male youth)
More recreation programs. (female youth)
More programs created for after school and weekend to engage them. (parent)
Educational activities about drugs, more help for youth who come to the US/DC. (parent)
Programs that keep them involved rather than watching television. (parent)
Jobs. Even if part time, it’s better than leaving them under-supervised or free. (parent)"
My dry cleaner echoed these sentiments as I was relating the tale of how I received raw egg all over my suit jacket. The common sense theory seems to be that kids don't have many productive ways to spend their time.
Those kids are most likely from the section 8 coop of Faircliff Plaza West. They have the nicest looking subsidized housing that I have ever seen.
They run around rampant without adult supervision.
They fire bottle rockets at odd ends of the night. They trash their own parking lot with garabage every day.
They get to drive around in mopeds on the sidewalk without helmets.
There is a security guard on the property, but if they can't or won't stop these kids from causing trouble, what exactly are they going to do with some of the aggressive older kids getting their kicks assaulting people?
The problem really extends to the meanest of the bunch, as several younger ones seems to just go along to get along. But the fact is that this city works against us by offering too much protection to these kids.
Those that break the law, get picked up, processed and dropped off again at home, usually same day. No one can find out who they are, you can't get a name of their parents or guardians, no one can find out how many priors they've committed, etc.
We need legislation that allows victims to bring civil suits on their guardians and/or parents for violence perpetuated their children. They are ultimately responsible for the actions of the minors under their care.
Touche, although...
Just cause you have a white girlfriend doesn't mean you aren't racist, it just means you get along with one white person really well.
I'll put down my "MLK" card if you put down your "not racist cause I date a white girl" card.
It is a horrible situation in CoHi. If a 12 year old kid comes up and punches me in the face and starts to beat me with a brick, and I attempt to defend myself with use of physical force (it is unrealistic to take a beating and wait for the D.C. police to show up four minutes later), I will surely suffer the brunt of the media and community's criticism for "abusing" a minor or harming a youth. The last thing anyone should want is to be an outcast in their own community, which is what would inevitably happen.
The only way to keep this from occurring is to have the ability to deter attacks before they happen. This leads to the age old question: why aren't district residents allowed to defend themselves? If I were allowed to carry a handgun in a holster attached to my belt, I guarantee that the neighborhood kids wouldn't throw any rocks at me or anyone I was with, let alone attempt to mug me, thus preventing any unwelcome attacked.
If anyone in D.C. needs to "grow up" or "mature," it is the members of the city council to continue to promote the unconstitutional laws that restrict residents from their right to bear arms.
Will do...
So few of the commenters seem to appreciate that all neighborhoods change. Before CH was black, it was white. Before whites, there were Indians [who were ultimately imigrants themselves - NOT natives].
Please dont draw an arbitrary historical line demarcating legitimate residency/culture. The issue is crime. So spare us the lame, socio-economic/race-baiting excuses.
There is a neighborhood that never changes, always 'respects' the current culture and will never evolve. It's called Main St USA and its in Disneyland.
#117, since nobody else has...
Latino gangs are apparently an issue, but if you're not latino, you generally don't have to worry about it.
For the most part, they have a good work ethic, and it pays off. They're strivers, they wouldn't have come here if they weren't, so even though it sucks, they're realists and they work within the system rather than complaining.
Kai, what exactly is being lost? Less rats in the alley? Less drug dealing on the corner? Less vagrancy and public loitering?
What exactly is the slap in the face?
I think it's reverse racism and ignorance in large part. No one likes these Faircliff apartments kids because THEY make it very difficult to live next to them.
So sorry if we're on their "turf". I doubt some of these knuckleheads understand that it's not exactly their turf to begin with. They are fortunate enough to have a roof over their heads thanks to subsided grants of taxpayer money.
If anything they should be thankful for the changes that are happening around them... and they're going to keep happening, whether they like it or not.
Seriously, "Illogical", you're going to bring up the "right to bear arms" as the solution to this problem? Not to sound like a naive little liberal, but maybe if we figured out what the root problems were, we wouldn't have to shoot each other. Oh and don't forget, if you have the right to own a gun in DC, so do all the thugs. Maybe you'll just shoot each other into oblivion and the rest of us can duck out of the way.
That's the point, Kittens, all the thugs DO own guns...
As for the 'root' of the problem? How 'bout unsupervised groups of kids with parents who either don't care or don't know what they're doing.
Solution: Don't allow these people to have kids or hold the 'parents' responsible.
Illogical, if you think shooting a kid is going to make your problem go away, you're in trouble bro. Some of the kids will shoot back, no problem.
Last thing we need is race war. No, the real problem isn't adults causing violence, its these minors that know they aren't going to suffer any serious repercussions if they get caught causing trouble.
The only way past this is allow lawsuits to go after these guardians and parents.
When it comes to kids, if you can't control them, you shouldn't have 'em.
Since we are talking about "thugs" it is safe to say that most of them have prior felony convictions, which would prevent them from owning guns legally. But none of this matters, because most of the thugs own guns illegally already!
The only people who don't have guns in this city are the law abiding citizens who are the victims of these crimes to begin with...
My premise stands: deterrence is everything.
I never advocated shooting anybody, nor would I ever.
There is a town in Georgia... Kennesaw is the name. Crime isn't a problem there--even being so close to the ATL.
Read this article from
And there are bad ass kids in Frederick, MD, Fredericksburg, VA, Prince Frederick, MD, and Fredericktown, OH, too... you just don't hear much about it.
Please stop saying Reverse Racism, it implies that regular racism is a one-way street that goes from white people to non-whites, and any other form is something completely different, which is BS.
Alex, you are an idiot, I hope you are joking. Furthermore, I don't think young blacks of Columbia Heights have internet access to heed your warning, else they wouldn't be hucking rocks for fun.
I grew up in PG (Upper Marlboro), got bused to Oxon Hill High and (as a white) got occasionally punched/mugged/etc by the majority black student body. Fine. As my childhood neighborhood grew increasingly black over the last two decades rapes started to happen, murders started to happen, and I got mugged in a neighborhood I lived in for 20 years and never heard of anyone getting mugged in. My parents moved to Baltimore (of all places) to get away. Now I live in Capitol Hill and I'm called a pilgrim. I've been mugged at gunpoint by three 14 year olds (all caught an hour later) with a gun who stole my cell phone and then used it to call their friends - and my cell phone bill a month later showed after a little investigative work that their friends all live a few blocks from me. I went to the houses, talked to the parents, and got laughed at. Chalk it up to 'reaction to gentrification' if you'd like, but I see out of control kids and a black community that feels their actions are halfway justified.
And by the way, wasn't Capitol Hill a working class white community a few decades back?
DCist folk,
Can you maybe talk about what your editors and contributors think about these intense discussions/flamewars that your posts are generating?
While I do think these are issues that need discussing, they rapidly degenerate into awful name-calling, stereotyping, animosity, empty threats like Alex's bullshit comment, etc.
Not to mention with DCist's rather narrow demographic, we're likely getting a rather skewed perspective on things.
Do you hope to achieve constructive dialogue here? Because it seems to be fostering an unhealthy amount of bitterness, and I'm not sure what can be achieved. At any rate, I think a better understanding of your editorial intent is needed - because it's starting to look like you're baiting this stuff on purpose, and I hope that's not the case.
I understand that this particular post is a piece of neighborhood news, but it seems like these distasteful threads are beginning to dominate your comments.
I think we're very clear about the premise. There is no reason to say you wish you could legally carry a gun in the city, as deterrence, if you are not considering or be willing to shoot a juvenile in self-defense to begin with.
They won't mess with you, if they think you are likely to shoot them, that implies you'd have be ready and capable of doing that.
And what I am saying, is that even if you did shoot someone in self-defense, your problems wouldn't go away, they'd come after you.
Situation has to be handled aggressively by the Council, we are protecting these children and their parents too much for their crimes.
I think a child crosses the line when they commit violent crime. They need to be tried as adults or they their parents to answer for their children's actions. There should not be any middle ground or grey areas when it comes to dealing with violent crime.
It really upsets me to think what would happen if I am riding my bike in Columbia Heights and a 12 year old kid drops a brick out of a 4th story window and it hits me in the head.
Most likely, I'd suffer some serious injury most likely resulting in a brain injury. This would force me to take time off work, or even worse lose certain mental capacities I had before. I could even potentially become a vegetable from this. If I had a wife and kids, they'd have to treat me like a baby the rest of my life instead of the grown man that I am. I've worked extremely hard to better myself and progress so that it could all be taken away in an instant by a delinquent out to have a few jollies?
The real problem is what this kid's punishment would be. Sure he'd spend some time in a juvenile detention center, maybe get a little probation, but nothing as significant as the permanent prison I would forever be in due to my persistent vegetative state. He'd be free to live his life as a hoodlum and thug while my family was forced to pay exorbitant health costs to take care of me. He wouldn't know the effect he had made on my life 5 years ex post facto. He'd get to live the way he wanted to, while I was forced to live the way I was forced to because of his actions.
The truth of the matter is, these kids need to fear retaliation, or else they won't stop doing what they are doing. The police don't do enough to stop this, nor do the applicable laws, so we have to. Give us our right to inflict the necessary fear into those who wish to perpetrate these crimes on us to prevent them from ever doing so. Social programs don't seem to be working, especially since the majority of these incidents seem to be happening around the Boys and Girls club which is supposed to be educating the youth to refrain from behaving this way. Clearly an alternative must be sought out.
Gentrification is the only real solution. Free market removal of violent, anti-social, non-productive, illiterates and replacement with the representatives of american normalcy and civility.
RBK..just like the guy who got beaten to a pulp and died in Bensonhurst ( a black man attacked by white thugs) he just pulled out his magic blackness and subdued said wimpy whiteys.
Hill Rat:
It does matter how you dress and how you present yourself.
If people present themselves as part of a thug culture, with the droopy drawers, the bling, etc., then they should expect to be treated as part of the thug culture, which glorifies violence, theft, etc.
That's not to say dressing well means happiness all around. I'm sure you as a black man will often be treated differently than I, a white man, will be, even if we're both sporting sharp suits or whatnot.
Of course, that cuts both ways. You'll get much better treatment from a lot of blacks, and I'll get much better treatment from a lot of whites.
RBK:
I appreciate the clarification.
But I wouldn't say you were too ambitious in your prose. You presented two scenarios, labelling them according to race, as if ALL people in those race classifications think that way. Both scenarios were stunted, poorly formed stereotypes of both black and white behaviors.
But the language differences between the two were quite striking. You were very sympathetic to the black point of view, and you were stunningly hostile in your portrayal of the white point of view.
And you didn't do a whole lot to inject fact or reason into either of these caricatures, to counterbalance the caricatures themselves.
So when you post like that, expect people to call you on it.
But I am glad that at least you condemned violence.
And this whole idea of blacks being displaced after decades of being in one neighborhood because they can't afford real estate taxes seems way overblown to me. There are about a zillion programs in DC to make sure no one loses their house because real estate taxes go up. In fact, some programs go so far as to defer all taxes until the death of the homeowner.
And if someone lived in the area for decades and never bought their property then my sympathy extends only so far. You could buy a house for next to nothing in most of these areas less than 15 years ago, especially with all the government programs out there.
If you take the easy way out and rent for decades, the tradeoff is that you may find yourself priced out one day.
Guys, I'm going through and deleting a lot of comments that are grossly offensive and/or contain threats. If the conversation in here doesn't continue in a civil manner, I'm going to shut them down.
Crime isn't a problem there--even being so close to the ATL.
You're joking, right? Kennesaw is in Cobb County, 27 miles northwest of Atlanta. Marietta is an inner-city ghetto by comparison. I could just as easily point at Montgomery County and say: yes, the streets of Bethesda are safe, now, thanks to the hydrogenated oil ban.
The streets of Bethesda are safe bc of a hydrogenated oil ban? Whatever man, shit is real here. I was walking home late Saturday night and some dior homme wearing thugs jumped me and took my gucci loafers. Fucked up.
Also, I'm from Hagerstown and there are lots of fucked up people there, lots of drugs like crack, def rednecks with guns, etc but no one ever really kills anyone else. DC is just fucked up.
On a more productive note, if people feel that city youth here are a prob, which I def do think of giving money to places like The Arc www.thearcdc.org that provide kids with after school activities, access to THE ARTS (what a novel concept) so that maybe they can channel angst, anger, sadness, aggression, what have you, into art and not your face via a brick. I live in Bethesda and I see all of the safe greenspace that kids around here enjoy and can play in and when i go to some parts of the city I wonder how any kid could grow up there bc of the lack of access to safe places to play, stretch their legs, work out all of those emotional issues that have physical manifestations that can end up making a good kid an angry teen if they keep it all inside. A lot of us on here could prob spare $100 a yr to orgs that help local kids.
Despite the cyber-tension, I'm glad that the item was posted, DCist. The ensuing comments have been enlightening and display much more intelligence and thoughtfulness than the usual internet user feedback (ok, that's not saying much). I wasn't aware that these emotions existed between DC residents, even if it may be with a small portion of the population.
I think some white people need to realize that racism, impulsive or directed, still exists and some non-white people still experience discrimination or are treated with caution or more. At the same time, I think that some non-white people need to realize that some white people have experienced racism themselves. The forms may be different in some cases, but does it matter who's retaliating for what, why, and for how long?
My personal opinion is not favorable for outsiders who move into a new neighborhood and disrespect their neighbors and established neighborhood history, waiting for the day when these people are pushed out so they can feel safer or whatever. But at the same time, I do not agree with long-time residents who resent new faces on their block or a quickly changing neighborhood demographic. No one group holds exclusive rights on any neighborhood; change is inevitable, just as I'm sure these neighborhoods were quite different 100 years ago. I don't want to live in an all white neighborhood, nor do I want to live in an all black neighborhood. There's plenty of racial and ethnic strife in this world, and I'm disappointed that we still haven't risen above this topic of ignorance.
Hill Rat:
It does matter how you dress and how you present yourself.
Of course it does, but what I think White people (especially those that also enjoy class privilege) simply don't get is how debilitating it is to always have to wonder how you're going to be perceived you enter a situation. W.E.B Du Bois coined the term "Double Consciousness".
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_consciousness
All social existence is the management of ones "impression" upon others. Whether it's amongst your "homeys" or "the man". Whether you are an Indian chief, hipster trying to "present" the impression that you don't "care" about your impression..you are always or should be aware of your presentation. That's what ALL fashion is about .. in the boardroom, the club, the street, the bedroom and so on. That "double consciousness" stuff doesn't stop OR start with your "impression" upon another ethnic group.
All social existence is the management of ones "impression" upon others.
Sure, but can you see how someone could make the point that Black people have to do more impression management than most other ethnic groups?
I would love to see this thread limited only to those who have actually been stalked, menaced and assaulted by groups of children. Until it happened to me I had no idea what it was like.
I have had rocks thrown at me and be stalked and menaced by the same group of kids that I have seen in hand cuffs in my alley 3 times. Imagine the chances of my seeing them arrested 3 times in my 6 months here.
Never in my life of living in the inner city have I been so horrified as I am now having stupid kids after me for fun or whatever it is they are thinking. In my opinion children are far more likely to do something extreme than adults.
Most of the kids in the Shaw area seem fine but there is a group of 5 kids here who are nasty little trouble makers who seem destined to do serious harm. Maybe they already have.
I can't wait until my lease is up.
Hillrat..You and I get stuck in this argument of "priveleged victimhood" alot. You don't seem to accept that I think that attitude is not only disempowering it is also patronizing. It's to ME an insistence on weakness or the plea to make some acception for inability. I am not in denial about the struggle of anyone's individual or group history- but suffering as well as will to self-assertion are universal.
"The racial tension is serious, no doubt in large part from things like luxary condos, Targets and TGI Friday's opening up across the street from subsidized housing and projects."
This type of attitude always makes me laugh. In what way are TFI Fridays or Target the domaine of white, yuppie gentrifiers. To be honest, I think that the new developments around Columbia Heights (certainly when compared with Logan, for example) are actually aimed directly at the local, working class residents.
Whole Foods, Starbucks, The Ellington etc are one thing, but no-one here has pointed to the new Giant - which really does serve the local residents. Many of the other stores already signed on for the Columbia Heights development (Best Buy, Bed, Bath and Beyond) are practical and much needed in the area. These are not tanning salons and doggie day care places.
Not to mention the redeveloped Bell Multicultural and the Charter School opposite on Irving. How many of the incoming white gentrifiers are really sending their kids to Bell? Not many, I'd imagine. Yet the neighborhood in general is benefiting from the changes.
And what about those wannabe punk kids that used to put on shows at what is now the Charter school? I'd like to see some comments from them about how incomers stole their crappy gig venue.
Superstar Tradesman
I was at the last Wilson Center show (what is now the Charter School) and I remember people being pretty cool and accepting of the fact that the space could do more good for the community as a school than as a venue.
Besides it's a great show: Page 99, Virginia Black Lung, Strike Anywhere, a bunch of other hardcore bands and oh yeah, Q and Not U before Matt Borlik left the group. Killer show man...
SuperstarTradesman is right. The majority of the new retail outlets that are going into Columbia Heights are not outposts of yuppie glamor but rather normal, neighborhood-type places that provide benefit to the whole community, regardless of income. In fact, if you want to get your anti-elitist dander up, go to columbiaheightsnews dot org and read through the comments - a lot of people are complaining about the DC USA store mix (Target, Marshalls, Foot Locker, etc.) because they don't find the stores to be nice enough for their tastes. These people are literally upset that they have to walk 10 minutes down to Whole Foods.
The example of DC USA illustrates a particularly weird (in my experience) aspect of the whole gentrification debate in DC. I used to live in the northernmost neighborhood of Manhattan, which was working-class, primarily Dominican but gentrifying as more young people, actors, professional families, etc. were moving north because they couldn't afford more central Manhattan. A few blocks away over in the Bronx there was a giant parcel of land that was being redeveloped for retail - some of the exact same stores as in Columbia Heights (Target was the anchor, they had a Marshalls, Starbucks, and an Applebee's I could never find anyone to eat at with me.)
In NY, these stores were a SELLING POINT. When I bought my apartment, the real estate agent was quite happy to tell me that a Target was coming in, and when it opened I went twice on the first day. The neighborhood was thrilled to have it. And, news flash: Target isn't a yuppie store. Has anyone ever *BEEN* in a Target? Their prices on basic toiletries (shampoo, soap, etc.) are often up to 1/3 less than at drugstores like CVS. I think their contact lens solution is about 50% cheaper - I go and buy their store brand in bulk. They also sell clothes, and I guarantee you that your K Street/Georgetown people aren't going to Target to buy jeans. Same with Marshalls and Lane Bryant. These stores are NOT yuppie outposts, people.
However, this being DC, the fact that they're putting middle-class stores into land that's been lying vacant for 40 years somehow morphs into big bad whitey coming to push out the black man. Never mind that the local black population is going to benefit hugely from the lower prices, better selection, and jobs that the stores will bring.
This kind of self-defeating attitude, which appears to be rooted solely in paranoid hatred, really flummoxes me.
For the record: Some of us work extremely long hours and slink home tired as hell, and just want to get to sleep. If that looks "self absorbed" or "arrogant", y'all need to get another hobby, because the psycho-analysis thing isn't working.
Honestly...people (especially white people) just aren't ORGANIZED enough to launch a racial takeover conspiracy. Isn't everybody just trying to earn a dollar, feed themselves, and live another day without losing a pint of blood on the sidewalk because some tragic fool needed to entertain himself?
And to the tragic fools out there: please knock it off. The next person you hassle might rip your f*cking head off. No, that wouldn't solve the problem either. Just a thought.
The Invisible Hand
As individuals our lives are composed of a negotiation between radical subjective self hood and objective social structures. This IS a capitalist, free market liberal democracy rooted in European tradition, aesthetics, morality and political science. Although it owes more of a debt to african and native american culture than it will acknowledge, the OVERWHELMING structure comes from the Western tradition.The hispanics and Afr Americans buffeted around by social processes would be infinitely better served adjusting to that reality than waiting for some unrealistic adjustment of the dominant to their hulmble worldview.
I will just add one thought. I am a new CH resident. I have already engaged in several community clean-ups, spending hours picking up all kinds of disgusting trash, spent a day working to resod an elementary school playing field, and engaged in other forms of community service. On each and every occasion, every single person who was involved in the service was one of the gentrifiers, and probably about half gay guys (I am not one, but appreciate of anyone who tries to beautify / protect a community). Is CH really worse off for gentrification? Does this kind of work warrant having stones thrown at us, literally and figuratively by racist idiots like rich black kid (who is no better than a klan member or some other white racist)? For anyone who remains, you get cleaner streets and schools, much higher property value (for those who bought their homes), more restaurants and middle-class retail, fewer criminals, and a much more beautiful surrounding area. Do you really miss the den of prostitution and crack houses that have closed down and turned into condos and restaurants? Would you rather have garbage and graffiti everywhere and more stores selling singles of liquor on every corner? What, other than cheaper property taxes, do you miss exactly? It's not like folks had spent years making CH a wonderful, pristine, middle-class black haven, only to pave the way for the rich, white, gay yuppies who forcibly removed folks from their homes. Long time residents have no more right to the community than the white residents who were displaced 40 years ago. If someone is willing to invest in a community, both money and love and swear equity, then they have every right to live there. CH is now very diverse, why should whites be excluded? Once I see more representation of long-timers at community clean ups, rather than just sitting around a park loitering and watching newbies paint walls and pick up trash and complaining about how awful we are, then I'll feel a little more sympathy for their complaints.
Can't agree more with Sweet and the alleged original e-mail writer. This point can't be made enough: while I completely respect the dynamics that racial injustice play in society as a whole, man, the self-hating white people need to stop talking as though they somehow deserve to have rocks thrown at them in their own neighborhood because of historic, systemic, deep-seated racial injustice that is so much bigger than you moving into a majority-black neighborhood.
No one deserves rocks, and no community should put up with kids who are pulling that crap. If police aren't going to, well, police, then the community has to step up.
White people shouldn't be keeping their heads down and walking around in fear as though they don't belong in this neighborhood. That's self-imposed isolation. You want to belong? Keep your head up, say hi to your neighbors, wave to the kids, be a part of things. If you keep your head down and don't engage, people looking for someone to hurt will victimize you because you look like a victim.
CH Newby --
Your other points notwithstanding, it seems extremely unlikely that white residents of Columbia Heights "were displaced" 40 years ago, given the history of race and real estate in American cities. If white residents decided they had to move out because some black people moved in, it's not quite the same as being forced out because your landlord is renovating your apartment building to turn it into condos.
That obviously doesn't excuse a bunch of kids acting like idiots. But since they're most likely acting like idiots because they're kids, not because they're trying to convey some radical political message (no matter what kind of names they call people while they do it), the history of white flight from Columbia Heights and surrounding neighborhoods probably doesn't bear that directly on the rock-throwing anyway.
When rocks are outlawed, only outlaws will have rocks.
CH Newby (D'oh)...you can't read either? and it is funny of all the B.S. posted on this message board, you target me...how ironic is that? When i was merely suggesting what some of the issues may be and went further to explain and apologize for the mischaracterization of SOME of you (maybe you are just looking for strife or you are just very late joining in the fun here) and further went on to say usually this debate is founded in ignorance on both sides...i personally don't believe anyone should be dis-allowed to live anywhere...but you know what, since i see you are having problems and can't grasp the concept...fini.
Do people live for the opportunity to call a minority racist, so they don't feel so bad, is that it? And it is always the ones with outstanding personal experiences (i tutor chinese kids, in the basement of a latino church in the heart of harlem) that are quick to pull the card.... But guess what, the issue still remains, despite all of your efforts. Like the fellow said previously when trying to depreciate the racist experiences of one black man, lay the fault in the actions of his own people...well, here i am asking you to do the same. If it isn’t you, could it be some other caucasian? Possibly?
And to those who suggest my opinion is biased, well i ask, How the hell can it not be as a black man in this country? And to those who say, get over it, go tell a Jewish person to get over the holocaust and see the response you get.
and CH Newby schmuck, since i know you took everything out of context... How dare you suggest that whatever i may think comports to the actions of the Klan, i don't preach segregation or domination, i don't lynch people, i don't murder people, i don't harrass people, i don't rape people, i don't bomb churches, i don't kill innocents (or anyone for that matter), i don't destroy peoples' lives, i don't bomb places of business, i don't burn down homes, i don't intimidate people, i don't use police force to kidnap and beat people (that's your history)...so where were you going with this?
Who knows where to even start with this, but I will echo the idea that a Target moving into a neighborhood is not a bad thing. Count the number of DC plates in the parking lot of the Target on Route 1 in Alexandria and you will see that DC residents, black, white, Hispanic, young, old, etc all appreciate lower prices on staple products like paper dishes and potato chips.
If there is demand in DC for a Target (and a Wal Mart if you count the DC plates down in Kinstowne) then who really cares if a Target or Wal Mart opens up in Columbia Heights.
I would think that a store that sells things that people need at low prices would be a better than a vacant lot or a bullet-proof window take out store selling rolling papers. But what do I know, I am white and moved here to take a good job, so I am clearly the devil himself.
Better that all of the decisions in this city be made by the "old timers" who have shown their astute political judgement by electing Marion Barry (twice) and Sharon Pratt Kelley.
No, no, no - Why then is it the gentrifiers fault that landlords are converting to condos or upgarding apartments to make more money.
Seems to me that the "blame" should lie with landlords who are seeking to maximize their profit. Obviously the gentrifiers are "enabling" the landlords or developers by agreeing to pay what are percieved as inflated rates. But your point makes no sense.
For the most part, it does not seem like th "project" housing or other low income, senior city sponsored units are under threat. Few of those apartment blocks down 14th below Irving are being torn down or renovated, nor are the units between 14th & 15th on V street near the developments there.
The city provides limited housing for residents who need/qualify for it. Other portions of the housing stock are managed by the private sector and landlords are well within their rights to upgrade in search or higher rents or sales prices.
Here in the heart of the nation's capital we are talking as if it's East Berlin in the late 1970s.
I got two words for all y'all: Bernard Goetz.
The only way the city government (the entity most directly able to change this situaiton) will do something about this is when a grown-up sociopath with a gun shoots and/or kills the juvenile sociopaths who are attacking people.
Then again, maybe not, since even decent, minding-their-own business kids have gotten shot in Columbia Heights and nothing has changed (see discussion of Donte Manning case at: nativeson.wordpress.com/2006/05/05/remember-donte-manning/ ..... thanks, "stop snichin").
As the rants on this post indicate, this problsm is already at a high simmer, and I predict it's not going to take much to get it to a full vigorous boil.
Jds-
1. check yourself- I am black. I grew up in the ghetto. More rec centers and community centers don't help.
2. people come to america and stay in america because of it's promise of a higher standard of living. That's not arrived at or maintained by accident. It's poorer people who should adjust to what makes america work.
jds is an asshat.
And how is it white people's fault that DC is governed by clowns? Last I checked, DC was still majority black. Also last I checked, a large proportion of newcomers to DC do not register to vote here because they want to vote for their local rep/senator back in their home states. So the percentage of voters in DC who are black is if anything higher than their share of the overall population.
But of course it's always whitey's fault in this town.
Please.
I am a big fan of "purgation". I like these discussions where people can get it all out, whatever the perspective. We have to live together in understanding. The summer has just started. We have yet to hear the inevitable news story related to cultural friction that brings us altogether in horror , I for one would like to see it avoided altogether this summer.
ChelseaDagger --
I wasn't putting blame anywhere, necessarily, and I certainly wasn't saying it's the fault of people who move in that they're being hit by rocks -- on the contrary, I said the rock throwing was just kids being idiots. If they were a bunch of Finns, Samoans or Orthodox Jews throwing rocks, they'd still be idiots, but being kids, they'd probably still do it. Some kids act like idiots, and it's only the adults who feel the need to read complex socio-economic messages about gentrification into the way their idiocy plays out.
But CHNewby asserted that the people being displaced now have "no more right to the community than the white residents who were displaced 40 years ago," which seems to equate voluntary white flight with the often involuntary fallout of economic transformation of poor neighborhoods. Which is ridiculous. If white people left the neighborhood 40 years ago, they did it because they feared their property values would fall because of their new black neighbors. And when they took their middle-class incomes and their votes with them, leaving less money to sustain area businesses and little incentive and/or ability for politicians to provide good services to the area, their fear became a self-fulfilling prophecy. I'd say the people who lived in the neighborhood even as it fell into significant disrepair and kept it from becoming a complete nightmare have a stronger claim to the community than the people who left.
As for today, the buildings you mentioned aren't being torn down or renovated yet, but that doesn't mean they won't be once the existing developments go forward. Regardless, plenty of rents have been raised, plenty of rowhomes have been rehabbed into expensive condos, and plenty of property tax bills have gone up already. For longtime residents of a neighborhood that was struggling for decades, that's a shock no matter who's at fault -- landlords, new neighbors, the failure of the U.S. to come up with sane urban planning over the last century, etc. Of course landlords have the right to do what they want if it's within the law, but it doesn't mean their decisions have no consequences.
Surely we can have sympathy for people who have had their lives thrown into some turmoil as a result of gentrification, even while we also recognize that new development can often bring benefits for the area and the city as a whole, can't we?
Probably not, as this is an anonymous Internet comment thread. But you see my point now?
Here's the deal, let's try brutal honesty. When I heard about some kids up in Columbia, MD having some sort of big fight in a school yard and some kid being hit over the head with a bat and being in the hospital, I assumed they were a bunch of black thugs. Probably foreign thugs to boot, since the names were all kinda weird. The next day, I read that the victim had died and the Post gave his picture... he was white. All the kids were white. I hated myself for thinking that.
Now consider this. The first time I went to the AU cafeteria, I had no friends and it was packed (this was pre-TDR remodelling), no place to sit... except this one spot way over in the far corner. There were TWO empty chairs, all the kids at that table were black. Plenty of kids kept searching for "nearer" seats. I walked over there to ask if the seat was taken... They paused to stare at me smile.
Sounds like a different person, hunh? No, same person both times. I have MANY moments where I wonder what I am. Like RBK, I haven't lynched, raped, preached discrimination or segregation, burnt homes, etc. (I disagree with him that those events are "my" history, or anyone's history except for the people who were there doing those things.) But what does that make me, prejudice part of the time? Semiracist?
I went to a wedding a few years back. A black couple I knew were getting married (I knew the groom). It was in NE somewhere, I don't even really remember where except near the Brooklyn metro, since that's where I ended up. I left the wedding with another friend, black and gay, and we got lost. It was a neighborhood and the streets were mostly empty for a sunny afternoon. Eventually, I saw some black guy working on his car and walked up to ask him how to get to a metro. Before I spoke a word, he said "What the hell you doing here? You know where you are boy. Stupid. Stupid and white. Get outta here." I could only smile. After I asked about the metro, he just said, "I told you to leave. Now." We eventually found the metro. Why was I stupid? Because I didn't know my way to the metro? Is it because I'm white? But then shouldn't it have been "half-stupid and half-white"?. I remember being a little stunned at the guy's tone and words... thinking back, I think he meant to be nice. He knows what some of his neighbors would think of me being there. You see. Racism and prejudice are not traits exclusive to white people. Black people can be like that too. Amazingly, that's comforting to me in one way... it shows to me that "they" are just like "us". They're people.
Oh, here's another experience: my white neighbors wouldn't say "hi" or "hello" to me for a year... Why is this, because I'm not completely white enough? Too dark? Nope. I figured it out eventually. They just didn't want to know me... at least not until they needed to borrow a hammer and a wrench for a bookcase.
Jds-
1. check yourself- I am black.
You love dropping that bomb don't you Chris Lee? I'm surprised people are still taking the bait.
But back to what you were saying about "privileged victimhood" (#151). Our fundamental disagreement comes from the fact that I believe "privileged victimhood" is an oxymoron; there is no privilege in being repeatedly victimized by racism.
Unfortunately windbags like Al "I was a paid snitch for the FBI" Sharpton and Jesse "I have less integrity than God gave a gnat" Jackson have built their bully pulpits on our nation's shameful legacy of racism. These two bloated, bloviating, blowhards have been tapped by the "liberal media" to represent Black Americans and it has been to our detriment. So I see where you get the idea of "privileged victimhood" from, but what I don't get is why you are so intent on dismissing any discussion of Black American's unique situation as just so much pissing and moaning?
"just so much pissing and moaning?" your words not mine. Everyon's "particular" suffering may be unique, but "suffering" as such is universal. I am reacting to useing it as a crutch.
Reading over these comments is really depressing. There are a lot of different views anyone can have regarding violence and racism in this town. I believe it is all perspective.
Often times, people who have had negative encounters with people of a different race, all the sudden make a generalization that all people of that race must have the same quality. Racism and generalizations are everywhere, as seen in the comments listed.
I've been mugged and had rocks thrown at me by some Black kids in the neighborhood. I get really angry about it and I really do hate the kids that assaulted me. They happen to be Black, but I do not hate all Black people. Some of my best friends are Black. On the other hand, we don't know the full story of some of these kids and whether the hate stems from a bad experience they've had with people of other races. In addition to this, there is racism that exists within one's own race. For instance, I'm Asian and I'm married to a Caucasian man and I get looks and comments all the time from Asian people. I'm sure Blacks experience racism within their own culture as well as Caucasians, Hispanics and everyone else on this planet.
Like someone said earlier, the problem in this case is the violence. Unfortunately, sometimes racism leads to violence and vice versa- violence leads to racism.
Anyone have any real solutions to all this?
"just so much pissing and moaning?" your words not mine. Everyon's "particular" suffering may be unique, but "suffering" as such is universal. I am reacting to useing it as a crutch.
I don't think I'm suggesting using suffering (or the unique situation of Blacks in America) as a crutch, but rather an essential data point to be consulted and considered when making decisions that relate to race.
Chris - Are we the last two at the party? Will the elusive 200 comment mark be eclipsed in this thread? Stay tuned . . .
Has there ever been a DCist thread that hit 200? If this one does, do we all get T-shirts or something, maybe a gift bag?
Or let me put it this way: "God is dead, all things are permitted." Bullies exist. Given the chance somebody is going to try to take advantage of you. So what. Next time a waitress won't serve you, next time somebody calls you a name, next time a cop stops you for no reason- straighten them out within the means appropriate to the situation.
Anyone have any real solutions to all this?
We have to keep talking to one and other; openly, honestly, and respectfully. Sure it's much easier (and more fun) to lob ad hominem broadsides at someone who has a different opinion than yourself but, aside from a few jackasses who are full of courage.com, for the most part folks here are trying to communicate with each other.
I know that some people feel that threads like this generate cheap heat for DCist, but I'm glad that folks are here and just as fired up as ever. You know what they say: the opposite of love isn't hate, but indifference. And indifferent is one thing no one can accuse the commenters here of being.
HR
Proxli...unfortunately, yes that is your history, as well as mine, and anyone else's who claims to be an American...it would be nice if we could pick and choose what we would like to remember as things that transpired in this nation...but to do that is to deny truth. Today wasn't born out of nowhere.
Now, who should be held accountable for it is a totally different issue.
178
Has there ever been a DCist thread that hit 200? If this one does, do we all get T-shirts or something, maybe a gift bag?
How about a three liter jug of Carlo Rossi and a pack of Garcia Y Vegas that we share amongst ourselves?
I'm with you on the Carlo Rossi, but nix the cigars (remember - I love smoking bans!) I'll see you the cheap wine and raise you some cheese from the P St. Whole Foods, though.
I prefer my wine from a box, thank you very much...what are we, savages?
and i'll raise you, one carton of Dutch Masters.
I say we pick a bar. I would like to meet some of you good for nothin' blow hards...;)
Chris Lee - I'm part black and part latino... how you like them apples?
Life in the city is violent, life in the world is violent. While you'e getting your lunch money taken away and having your underpants pulled up over your head, your beloved troops are taking civilian lives by the hundreds of thousands and torturing some poor farmer because he thinks the U.S. government is a giant bully.
And all you people seem to care about is your property value, your suv's , and safe trips to the gym and access to a nonfat double soy latte.
Stop your sobbing.
"Anyone have any real solutions to all this?"
Just be open and try to help where you can. Do that for a while and you'll learn the whos, whys and hows. You and your neighbors won't be nameless or faceless to each other. If nothing else, that's a success in itself.
thanx jds..#183..Anyway, given the inevitable brutality and chaos of the world, all the more reason to admire any successful attempts and order and gentility. All the people dying to get in the States will tell you the same thing.
clearly, this makes jds the best potential dancer out of all of us...zing (shit, i am racist)
oh, what a day...
All love
"some of my best friends are Black"
lol
"how you like them apples?"
why would you ever type a sentence like this?
Hill Rat:
Always having to wonder how you are going to be perceived isn't something that just blacks have to do.
Us gay guys have to do the same thing. No matter how good or bad of a person I am to some I'll always be judged by the fact that I am gay, no matter what. And to some that means disparate treatment.
Blacks get it to. As do whites, when coming into contact with some blacks. As do hispanics, when coming into contact with both blacks and whites.
The list goes on and on and on.
White flight? Give me a break, there was never "white flight" from DC. DC has always been the home of transient and short-term upper-income (largely white) workers and a more diverse working class (largely black).
It was black flight that killed DC. Who do you think moved in to PG County and are now moving all the way down to Southern Maryland? Stand at L'Enfant Plaza one morning and watch who gets off those MTA commuter busses that come up from Prince Frederick and beyond. It isn't wealthy whites, its middle class blacks desperate for a nice house, a real yard, and decent schools and willing to commute 3 hours round trip to get it.
These people left DC long before gentrification began and while housing costs played a role (although not as much as you may think as housing costs everywhere have increased), you will find that what fueled this suburban migration is the same thing that fuels every suburban migration...backyards (DC doesn't have them) and good schools (DC again doesn't have them).
Fix the schools, make the parks more than simply depots for the homeless, and you might, might, have a chance of turning all of that around.
10 more to go...oops sorry
You know, after thinking about it, Target does offer affordable goods and could be a boon to local residents. I brought up Target as possibly sticking out in the neighborhood because it's a company that markets itself to more a more affluent clientel. Target's CEO Bob Ulrich has said exactly that in the press:
"...our guests, who are on average about 20 percent more affluent, more highly educated, come from more sophisticated areas."
My point was that in context of the Target, TGI Fridays, the ridiculously expensive condos and the freakin WINE BAR that opened up, the neighborhood has changed and the new developments are definitely targeting (no pun intended) more affluent people. I'm not saying that less affluent people won't shop at the Target, or that it's a bad thing that they've developed vacant land, but I'm sure there are folks out there who've lived in the area for decades who are wierded out and possibly upset that Columbia Heights is suddenly looking like more like Bethesda than DC.
Personally, having lived in that area for years, I view the whole development on 14th street as a little bewildering and strange, and considering how expensive all of these condos that they've put up are, I'm a little resentful.
Thanks SWester (#190) I felt kind of bad for a while like I had done something to contribute to the gentry problem, but apparently black people dropped the ball. Ha kidding!
Ok for serious now, it is true that people will move here for the jobs and nightlife but when it comes time to raise a kid, they sure as hell don't want to do it here, cause of the bad schools and open spaces. What is the answer? Apparently Fenty thinks he is it. Trying to take over the school system by legislative force and run it as his own pet project, we will soon see if this guy we rocketed into the mayoral office can deliver. If not we better hold him accountable.
RBK - You are racist. Most of the people posting here are racist, we just don't want to look at ourselves and deal with it. Instead, we go on these guilt trips and try to make ourselves seem like victims in a situation where we too are committing some form of violence whether we are aware of it or not. Imposing your lifestyle choices (SUV's , 4WD baby strollers, not picking your dog's poop) , shopping needs , live music bans, and the complaining about the previous inhabitants of your current neighborhood are all forms of violence.
IH - I have way too many friends from Boston, and I love using that phrase, I'll use it whenever I want.
I have to echo what someone said before... privileged white people always jump at the opportunity to make themselves out to be the victims of something or the other because they can's stand the fact that throughout history they tend to play the role of the conqueror, the oppressor, the executioner, the racist, the rapist, the dictator, so on.
It doesn’t take a lot to realize that you are privileged and that you have a responsibility of being aware of that privilege.
As a white person, or white in appearance you have the privilege of knowing that:
- If you should need to move, you can be pretty sure renting or purchasing housing in an area which I can afford and in which I would want to live.
- You can be pretty sure that my neighbors in such a location will be neutral or pleasant to me.
- You can go shopping alone most of the time, pretty well assured that I will not be followed or harassed.
- You can turn on the television or open to the front page of the paper and see people of my race widely represented.
- When you are told about our national heritage or about "civilization," I am shown that people of my color made it what it is.
- Whether you use checks, credit cards, or cash, you can count on my skin color not to work against the appearance of financial reliability.
- You can swear, or dress in second hand clothes, or not answer letters, without having people attribute these choices to the bad morals, the poverty, or the illiteracy of your race.
- You can do well in a challenging situation without being called a credit to my race.
- You can remain oblivious of the language and customs of persons of color who constitute the world's majority without feeling in your culture any penalty for such oblivion.
- You can criticize our government and talk about how much you fear its policies and behavior without being seen as a cultural outsider.
- You can be pretty sure that if I ask to talk to "the person in charge," you will be facing a person of your race.
corrections -
As a white person, or white in appearance you have the privilege of knowing that:
- If you should need to move, you can be pretty sure renting or purchasing housing in an area which you can afford and in which you would want to live.
- You can be pretty sure that your neighbors in such a location will be neutral or pleasant to you.
- You can go shopping alone most of the time, pretty well assured that you will not be followed or harassed.
- You can turn on the television or open to the front page of the paper and see people of your race widely represented.
- When you are told about our national heritage or about "civilization," you are shown that people of your color made it what it is.
- Whether you use checks, credit cards, or cash, you can count on your skin color not to work against the appearance of financial reliability.
- You can swear, or dress in second hand clothes, or not answer letters, without having people attribute these choices to the bad morals, the poverty, or the illiteracy of your race.
- You can do well in a challenging situation without being called a credit to your race.
- You can remain oblivious of the language and customs of persons of color who constitute the world's majority without feeling in your culture any penalty for such oblivion.
- You can criticize our government and talk about how much you fear its policies and behavior without being seen as a cultural outsider.
- You can be pretty sure that if I ask to talk to "the person in charge," you will be facing a person of your race.
Holy crap hombre, that was some racist sh*t you just dropped. For instance:
Assuming white people can afford the nice housing they want, and that they don't get harrassed in public because they are white is total bullsh*t.
Plenty of terrible things happen in white neighborhoods.
There are plenty of second- or third-generation non-whites who don't know or give two sh*ts about the suffering their grandparents went through. You put a child of any race in front of a TV long enough and they all come out the same.
I didn't make this stuff up... and I stand by it.
It's an essay used in anti-racism/anti-oppression trainings called "White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack" by Peggy McIntosh
"There are plenty of second- or third-generation non-whites who don't know or give two sh*ts about the suffering their grandparents went through. You put a child of any race in front of a TV long enough and they all come out the same." - you ARE kidding right?
JDS,
I wish.
Also, you can't just quote anti-racist materials and hope it sticks. Put some bearing on what you are saying.
Reading through the comments, I commend Rich Black Kid for role-playing out perspectives on this issue. It's always healthy to begin a conversation by considering all positions.
Obviously though, he somewhat (intentionally) misses the mark on the White perspective. His presumption damages his own position.
I suggest we all make a genuine effort in the exercise of empathy, ditch the assumptions, and work from there.
I retract my white flight comments, I agree with those who posted after me and they were not well thought out or well informed. However, I stand by everything else I said, in particular my disgust with rich black kid. Hey rich black kid, does this sound like a racist to you:
"White Perspective: I'm not racist, it is economics. Man, I didn't know d.c. was a denizen of black folks, no wonder I got this property cheap. I know black people, but these aren't like the ones from the upper middle class community I am from, so it is ok to ignore and belittle them. I am hip to their culture, I’ve got the cd collection to prove it. I didn't own slaves, nor do I believe there is a fallout from the segregated history of this country, and I am completely not interested in their issues, after all I have trees to save. Black people are scary. Now that this is MY HOME, I am going to make some changes to the community to suit myself, fuck the looooong history of the demographics, shops, churches, restaurants, barbers, establishments, etc,... that were here before me. If they can't afford to be my neighbours fuck em. These people have every opportunity in the world to be more like me...THEY CHOOSE NOT TO BE, fuck em. In fact sometimes, it pisses me off that they scold the opportunity to be more like me. Gentrification is not a bad word. Racism is dead. You are ignorant."
That is a negative generalization attributed to an entire race group. It's the same as me saying all black people are ignorant, fried-chicken eating criminals, something I would not say because I don't believe. You, on the other hand, clearly have some twisted beliefs about what all white people supposedly think. You are paranoid and delusional. Of course there are SOME white people who think that way, just as there are SOME cheap Jews, dirty Mexicans, asshole racist WASPS, criminal blacks, etc., but that does not make vicious stereotypes any less productive or accurate.
Here is what I ACTUALLY think. I chose to live in CH as opposed to say, Woodley Park, because I wanted to be in a diverse neighborhood with lots of different types of people, and in particular, in a dynamic neighborhood that was maintaining good traditions (authentic mexican places, barber shop culture, all that kind of stuff is great) while rooting out vices that NOBODY, black, white, or hispanic, wants in any neighborhood (public drunks, graffiti, garbage, kids throwing rocks, crime, prostitution, drugs).
I can't do anything to affect the history of segregation or slavery. I CAN donate money to local schools, I CAN "save trees", I CAN try to eliminate public drunkeness by pushing for single sales bans, I CAN clean up local schools, I CAN patronize quality businesses, new and established, and refuse to patronize The House, and I DO all these things. I am white, and I am possitive influence on Columbia Heights. F---g deal with it. I am not a savior. Not every black who moves out is a loss (though some are) and not every white who moves in is a negative (though some are). But to the extent people like you, people like Sinclair Skinner (do I have the right name) traffic in white devil stereotypes, you ARE no better than any other racist throughout history, you just perpetuate the same bs generalizations.
By the way, I second the Bernard Goetz point. It's only a matter of time if the city lets serious juvenile crime go unpunished before some terrified person who has had enough pulls out a gun and shoots and kills some 12 year olds throwing bricks or whatnot. Then things will really explode. This city needs a zero tolerance police for a year on juvenile crime to get the message out that kids don't have an imprimatur to assault people. Or maybe put their parents in jail, something. Of course it would be nice if the schools were not falling apart, but we need change from both ends: true opportunity as well as true disincentive for misdeeds. If something doesn't change, we are headed for vigilante justice, followed by a visit from Al Sharpton, followed by an erupting powder keg of back and forth blaming. Nobody wants that.
Once again, RBK, charming. Your articulate eloquence, the sheer force of your reason, your ability to elegantly capture the perspective of all blacks living in a gentrifying neighborhood (you didn't retract that one, did you, or did I simply miss that as well in the other 200 comments on this thread) are truly astounding. I can't imagine why any person, white or black, would ever choose not to fraternize with you. Of course, you have a white girlfriend, so anything you say is immune from criticism. Meanwhile, as a latte sipping hip-hop poser sipping wine at non-existent wine bars, I apologize profusely. I now have much greater insight into the apparently bigotted minds of all my neighbors, black and white alike (who, amazingly, I have never had any problem with, but I guess they just hid their hatred for my yuppie ass). I will now, as requested, take the tampon out of my ass and return to eating wonderbread and mayonaise sandwiches in Ballston. Thanks for enlightening me, and helping protect D.C. against the evil that I and my tax dollars represent.
White flight? Give me a break, there was never "white flight" from DC.
Sure there was, and not that long before black flight either. The integration of DC schools in 1954 was a major cause; the District's population peaked with the 1950 census and became majority-minority with the 1960 census, which ought to be pretty suggestive. Even as late as 1968, more white flight followed the riots than black flight, which didn't really get started until the later 1970s.
Questionable behaviour of CH residents:
Latinos -
Ride their mountain bikes on the sidewalk and expect pedestrians to get out of the way. Blast reggeaton from their car speakers so that the whole world can hear it.
African Americans -
Cut in line to get on the bus and talk really loud on those walkie talkie type cell phones. Blast hip hop or r&b from their car speakers so that the whole world can hear it.
White yuppies -
Jog on the sidewalks while not wearing a shirt (is that really necessary guys?)instead of using rock creek park for outdoors physical activity, blast Dave Mathews, Norah Jones, Temple of the Dog, Sublime or any other crappy artist whie people love from their car speakers. Don't even get me started on frat boys and their beloved Bob Marley's "Legend".
Everybody sucks, sometimes.
Guys, this isn't hard to understand. Keep your discourse civil, or your comment is removed, like the few I just deleted.
SWester --
You're wrong. Cminus has already addressed this to a certain extent. But the development of a massively transient population linked mostly to the federal government is relatively new. There used to be fairly large communities of Jewish, Greek and other non-WASP white populations who lived in neighborhoods like Columbia Heights and worked downtown in small businesses that had little, if anything, to do with the federal government. But most of those businesses don't exist anymore, and many of the descendants of the people who worked in them are in different lines of work now.
Follow the migration of synagogues from near 7th Street downtown (like the one at 6th and I, formerly the home of Adas Israel, which is now in Cleveland Park) to upper Northwest or the suburbs, and you can see how Jews, to take one example, mostly fled the city about 40 years ago. My own family is a good example of how the District's native Jews left neighborhoods like Columbia Heights. My great-grandfather lived in Mt. Pleasant and worked in a hat shop he owned downtown; his son (my grandfather) moved to Arlington and continued working there. The hat shop closed in the early 1980s, when the downtown business district started dying out. My father lives in the Maryland burbs and is a lawyer downtown, and now I'm back in Mt. Pleasant in another line of work altogether. As is the downtown business district -- the former hat shop now houses a gourmet lunch place.
Middle class blacks didn't move out of the city until after whites did, anyway, so black flight only exacerbated problems white flight had already set off.
jds, in a series of otherwise useful challenges to how to think about white privilege, you use a few examples on which I'm gonna have to call BS. Two in particular:
If you should need to move, you can be pretty sure renting or purchasing housing in an area which you can afford and in which you would want to live.
White != infinite money. Just because you won't be stopped from living somewhere for racist reasons doesn't mean you can afford it. I wanted to live in Columbia Heights, but it costs too much.
You can be pretty sure that your neighbors in such a location will be neutral or pleasant to you.
And not, say, throw rocks at you?
A few others are problematic, particularly "You can remain oblivious of the language and customs of persons of color..." and "You can criticize our government and talk about how much you fear its policies...", but addressing why they're problematic is more of an essay question than just poking a hole.
White people have much more options regarding where and how they want to live than minorities ever will. I don't believe that the essay refers to that issue in such specific or "absolutist" terms, it means that if you are white you are more likely to find a larger variety of and easily accesible places to live than a black or latino personal would. Denying the fact that landlords and real estate agencies are not for the most part racially biased would be ludicrous. Of course if you are white and plan on moving into a predominantly african american neighborhood you might be met with some hostility but even in that situation you have to ask yourself who gets a quicker response when dialing 9-1-1.
It is undeniable that white america is predominantly oblivious to the outside world and other cultures I can't otherwise find an explanation for the ignorant and racist approach of this country's government when it comes to foreign policy and why most americans approve it or choose to ignore it.
I recommend you read the entire essay, written by a white woman, and take it up with her.
It is undeniable that white america is predominantly oblivious to the outside world and other cultures I can't otherwise find an explanation for the ignorant and racist approach of this country's government when it comes to foreign policy and why most americans approve it or choose to ignore it.
"It is undeniable that white america is predominantly oblivious to the outside world and other cultures.."
I find this to be the most laughable chestnut ..Look in a brother's cd collection, how many copies of Yo Yo Ma, Paul Simon, Bjork, Carlos Santana, and even sometimes Nat King Cole will you find? But hang out with your quintessential post-college cosmopolitan. See him/her going to the Thai Restaurant with their friend visiting from Brazil. See the blonde white chick shaking her tailfeather to Parliament funkadelic saving money for a trip to China next Spring. How many blacks do you know that want to go to Europe or even Kenya compared to whites? This meme of the provincial white person who can't "get" the rest of us..what's that about?Who's most likely to go the concert of another culture? Who's more likely to study another culture? Who's more likely to willingly reach out to another culture?
"It is undeniable that white america is predominantly oblivious to the outside world and other cultures.."
I find this to be the most laughable chestnut.
No, I think it's technically accurate, just misleading. If you're going to say that white America ("I could be one of your kids!" sorry...) is "predominantly oblivious to the outside world and other cultures," you'll get no argument from me.
Where it becomes misleading is that it suggests, albeit with a Cheneyesque phrasing to ensure later deniability, that non-white America isn't. And that's simply not true. If there's one thing that unites all Americans, regardless of race or creed or color, it's that the majority of us know damn-all about any country we don't have a close personal tie to.
That said, it's not fair to compare the typical inner-city resident with a "post-college cosmopolitan" of the sort that we get a lot of in DC, because the cosmopolites are a small and very unrepresentative group. Heck, the very word "cosmopolitan" implies an international outlook, while America is a country where the average person doesn't even have a passport.
(Not to mention that non-white post-college cosmopolitans are just as eager to travel as their white peers, which suggests that class and education, not race, are the issues here.)
I agree that I am focusing on mostly the urban types. But contrast say the "urban white" with the "urban black". Is the urban brother as much a cosmopolitan as his white bread counterpart? How many black folks in DC do you see lining up for a meal at Thai-Tanic? How many white kids will you see at a 50cent concert compared to black faces at Pearl Jam?
I think we cracked 200, there isn't much further to go with this :)
"- You can remain oblivious of the language and customs of persons of color who constitute the world's majority without feeling in your culture any penalty for such oblivion."
So, JDS, I assume this means you're well-versed in Chinese culture? No? Why not? They are, after all, one-fourth of the world's population and, as far as I know, the single largest single cultural group in the world.
Target is a sign of affluence? Have you ever actually been in a Target? It's a discount store. Granted, a tiny bit up the scale from Walmart. But it's not exactly Neiman Marcus.
Hillman: Your ignorance is showing. Not that I'm an expert, but there are a great number of "Chinese" cultures that have little or nothing to do with eachother. Sechuanese is not Mandarin is not Tibetan, etc. China is an empire, sort of like the EU or AU by force. It's constituent groups have often have different cultural touchstones, and don't even necessarily communicate in the same native language. It's more extreme than asking a down-East Mainer to shoot the shit with a Louisiana Creole. Ayah?
I read a few of these posts earlier today and I found them interesting because I have lived in Columbia Heights for a couple years. CH is convenient and diverse. I have lived in 4 other neighborhoods in DC. A couple that most would not consider.
Most of these posts are pretty silly from my point of view...people are mad about something...or many things, and I think this forumn is a convenient release.
I am often outside in the neighborhood and I see these things:
1. People walking their dogs (I'm not even a big fan of dogs but it doesn't bother me)
2. People going to work
3. People going home after work
4. People going to grocery store
5. People waiting for the bus
6. People bringing their kids home
7. People going to eat
8. People picking up trash
I don't personally know of anyone who has had a bad experience here. I don't even lock my doors sometimes. I'm not scared.
I love when the neo-hipsters start with the "I'm so DOWN, man! I live in COLUMBIA HEIGHTS! All those people in Woodley Park and Cleveland Park are so WHITE, man! How can they go to sleep at night?"
Clifton St, I haven't spent the last five years on "voter empowerment" drives. I've spent longer than that living in Woodley Park, doing my office job, and spent the years before that living in several majority-black communities in the D.C. area. Know what? I'm paying less in rent than some of my friends who live within walking distance of the hippest TGIFridays in Washington. (It's all about what building you live in and who you rent from.)
I don't have a taqueria on every corner, but neither am I being assaulted on the street or on the way to work. Maybe I can't walk to Wonderland, but in my eyes, that's a fine trade-off. If I want to walk Monroe Street or U Street and pretend I'm hard, I can take a bus there.
Mark:
You have a point, to a point.
But the poster I was responding to was lumping all black people into one culture (and suggesting that blacks are in fact the world's largest race), based on skin color. Chinese people are generally of one race, and modern day China is a culture in and of itself, beyond the obvious many different groups that make up the overall culture. Are there different heritages, backgrounds, and languages? Of course. But the Chinese government has done a pretty good job of assimilating most into one group, for better or for worse, especially in urban areas. As a modern Communist country, they have a distinct culture that transcends their history.
Guys,
It seems like this discussion has run its course of anything productive to come of it. I'm going to shut it down this morning, so speak now or forever hold your peace.
TWO TWENTY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Yay ;)
221 - I win!!