Yesterday the WashTimes ran a story on a bill being introduced by D.C. Council member Jim Graham that would give budgetary oversight of the D.C. Water and Sewer Authority to the D.C. CEO CFO, Natwar Gandhi. This morning, the WaPo follows up with a story comparing the bill to Fenty's school takeover plan -- essentially the WASA board, much like the D.C. school board, would become mere advisors to their own budget process, while Gandhi's control would expand greatly.
WASA has always been a bit of a rarity among D.C. government agencies, having been largely independent and financial scandal-free since it was created ten years ago out of the framework of home rule. As such, WASA General Manager Jerry N. Johnson is strongly objecting to the proposal under if it ain't broke, don't fix it logic. But WASA is the only D.C. government agency not overseen by Gandhi's office.
Mayor Fenty's office has had little to do or say about this bill so far. It is clearly the brainchild of Gandhi, and was introduced by Graham, who became chairman of the Committee on Public Works and the Environment this year. But it's not hard to expect the Fenty administration, which if it's about anything is about streamlining responsibility and power into the hands of a very few top city leaders, to support the change. WASA's budget process may not be broken, but when you're restructing the government to ensure the buck stops at the top, you probably want to go ahead and try to fix it.



Wasn't WASA at least somewhat to blame for mishandling that lead in the water brouhaha a few years ago?
And wasnt WASA behind the "excessive turbidity" problem a few summers back (translation: tiny balls of feces in the water supply)?
As for the lead problem, I seem to recall their solution was to up the mineral content of the water to help re-line the lead pipes. Problem was, those mineral buildups have a nasty habit of falling off the pipes and turning the water a pale shade of milk.
This sounds like a power grab by Messrs. Ghandi and Graham, but I don't know how they could possibly screw WASA up any more. Prove me wrong guys!
And what does "restructing the government" mean? Is it some newspeak hybrid of "restructuring" and "destroying?" Because if it is, that's the kinda bold government initiative I can get behind!
"internal server error" sorry for any double-post
I've got at least two questions for WASA:
Why are private residences responsible for repairing broken water meters? They are almost always on city property (in alleys, sidewalks, etc), and it's not like people can take them if and when they move.
Why did WASA several years ago hire a Texan company to replace the old sturdy iron meter covers with new, flimsy, misfitting plastic ones?
Last I checked, Gandhi was the Chief Financial Officer, not the Chief Executive Officer of DC.
Will this help get the led out of our pipes faster?