Late last week, a joint Maryland state House-Senate committee approved a new regulation that defines domestic partnerships. A state law passed last year required not only health insurers to offer domestic partner coverage to companies that request it, but also the Maryland Insurance Administration to define domestic partnerships. The law took effect January 1.
The regulation defines domestic partners as a couple whose members are at least 18 years of age and "who for at least six months have been in a committed relationship of mutual interdependence." The definition is extended to straight or gay partners. Couples may verify their status with documentation such as a will, a statement from a joint bank account, or state-issued identification cards or drivers' licenses with a common address.
After passing the committee vote, the rule will go into a public input phase before it officially goes into effect. Conservative groups and Republican lawmakers have already criticized the rule's passage saying "it sanctifies cohabitation by straight couples." During the debate leading up to the vote, Cecil County Delegate Michael Smigiel (R) asked the committee, "Are we not promoting what in the past we would call shacking up? A domestic partnership is a gay marriage, that's what it is."
Openly gay state Senator Richard Madaleno (D) plans to introduce legislation to legalize same-sex marriage, but Democratic leaders in the House and Senate have said they won't support it.
Photo by jeffq

Car Pushed Into Anacostia River By Train


Yes, because heaven forfend we recognize how people actually live instead of some impossible Ozzie & Harriet vision of what the opponents would like to believe is perfection.
Unfortunately, as the New Jersey legislature is finding, because of preemption (partial or total) by the Feds in the realm of insurance regulation, this domestic partner regulation won't likely reach as far as they'd have liked it to. And that won't change until Federal law changes, no matter what the states do. Not to say they shouldn't go forward, but they should realize the practical limitations on whatever they enact in the short run.
Really, this is what they're up in arms about? It sanctifies two people cohabitating? Shacking up? Moving in together? Test driving a relationship before getting married? Oh noes! Two people who love each other and live together would be able to qualify for health insurance, without discrimination against sexual preference attached! How horrible! How unconstitutional! Quell it immediately!
So now my roommate and I (both hetero males) are domestic partners?
P.S. I'm happy that gay relationships are now recognized, however the definition is very broad.
Now how about the state of Virginia removes its bigotry from their constitution?
So can I finally marry my two dogs? I am a firm believer in canine polyamorism...
well hce, that would depend. are you and your roommate in a committed relationship of mutual interdependence and have been for the last six months?
or are you just trying to fool the system to get insurance for him? oh the horrors!