March 28, 2008
Don't Forget Your iPod...

Most of us take our iPods everywhere nowadays, and it’s not uncommon to see people wearing them in unusual places. In restaurants. In the grocery store. There are even gizmos that allow you to bring your iPod in the shower with you now. But when is the last time you saw people wearing their iPods at the theater?
Legendary modern dance choreographer Merce Cunningham considered this, and tonight and Saturday evening at Sidney Harman Hall, the Merce Cunningham Dance Company will perform eyeSpace to an audience full of people wearing iPods. The score for eyeSpace is a mix of vocal, instrumental, and spoken word which can be downloaded on an iPod before attending the performance (including on iTunes), or you can just snag one of the iPods provided for audience members when you get to there. An additional “environmental score” will also be performed live in the theater to reflect the sounds that portable music players attempt to tune out.
Photo by Anna Finke
Cunningham is encouraging audience members to select their own individual accompaniment to his choreographer, shuffling the score at random or listening to the ambient noise in the auditorium, each audience member creating their own experience. The possibilities are endless, because you could obviously also bring your own music. Try Cunningham to hard rock, classical, or country. See how the dancers look set to Billy Joel, Kanye West, or one of those Britney Spears songs you’re embarrassed to own. Heck, it’s Washington. Check out the performance as you listen to an NPR podcast and see how it turns out.
If you want to do things in the way Merce envisioned them, however, the Washington Post saya that there is a method to the madness, noting that, “before the piece begins, the audience is instructed to put the iPod on shuffle so there's no telling when a spectator will hear bossa nova, electronic music, prepared piano music, rock-and-roll or another selection.” The composer of the score, Mikel Rouse, estimates that there is the potential for three million different permutations.
While the concept for eyeSpace is new, pushing the envelope when it comes to the relationship between dance and music is nothing new for Cunningham, who has always argued that the two should coexist independent from each other. But you’ve got to hand it to the guy – he’s 88 years old and is still managing to come up with something current and different.
The company will also perform other Cunningham works including Second Hand, a piece based on elaborate finger positions, and CRWDSPCR, a work originally choreographed in 1993 using visualization software called DanceForms, that allows a piece to be "made" before dancers even enter the studio. Each of Cunningham’s works is special and innovative, but the highlight of the evening should be eyeSpace. Tickets for the 8 p.m. performances are $25-$63, and are available online or by calling (202) 785-9727.




Let me be the first to say, yowza, those dance tights don't leave much to the imagination. If you're in the first row, watch out, you can lose an eye!
I think Cranky's mid-afternoon snack just got ruined too.
honestly, I'm surprised Merce Cunningham knows what an iPod is, he is so old
The only thing that makes my junk look like the picture above is wearing a cup . . . or a codpiece.
OOoo more ridiculous iPod masturbation! Can i come and throw up all over myself while these stupid assholes provide more free marketing for apple? Yknow they had this thing called the walkman before the ipod, and then came the discman, and *shock* then came the mp3 player (yes they were around far before the ipod) and any one of these could have taken the place of a mac product? UGH! rant.
I vote someone grabs the pic there and files it on Flickr under the "bulges" pool...
Let me be the first to say, yowza, those dance tights don't leave much to the imagination. If you're in the first row, watch out, you can lose an eye!
This is the reason many of us attend dance performances in the first place - dance belt eye candy.
I'm with ya, carn. What's the appeal of listening to low-quality music (which may not even synch up with the performance) through headphones, when you could be hearing it live? It's like you're only getting half the show you paid for. I think iPods are poorly designed and don't deserve half the hype they receive, but even the biggest iPod fan has to realize how gimmicky this is.
As a dance geek, I was SO excited so see that there actually some comments on this post. Then I realized that most of them were about the dancers' junk. Awesome.
I guess it's better than the "yeah, get your leg up there " that we would've gotten if it had been a picture of a woman.
Sorry, kins, for dragging the discourse way down there with that first comment. I acknowledge the cultural importance of dance, but don't follow it or know much about it. Feeling guilty now, but that photo did cause me to chuckle on an especially grim day at the office.
As a dance geek, I was SO excited so see that there actually some comments on this post. Then I realized that most of them were about the dancers' junk. Awesome.
You are right: Merce Cunningham has done amazing things with technology and modern dance, and I would love to see this performance. And the use of ipods (which may or may not match up with what the company is doing on stage) is right in line with his other experimentations with randomness. I would say (along with Elizabeth Streb), Cunningham is one of my favorite choreographers.
But I had to go with the dance belt joke - it was there, and it's Friday.
I take back my comment too. I totally forgot that he developed that ridic software to choreograph with so he must be up on his technology.
This is retarded. There's absolutely no way to reliably synchronize the iPod score with the dancing. Even if all of the score tracks and every second of dancing WERE set to a uniform metronome click, there's no telling if a person were hitting is hitting "play" at just the right time. Even if there was a "1.. 2.. 3.. GO" countdown to hit play, every model of iPod probably has a slightly different latency between hitting play and the track actually starting, and between one track ending and another beginning; variable fade-over and gapless-playback settings further complicate this.
The logistics just don't work. Absolutely retarded.
VJ-
I think the fact that the music isn't going to match up in any reliable, consistent, or identical way is precisely the point here.
Which you may still find retarded, but that's an aesthetic argument, not a logistical one.
Yeah, I still find it retarded.
If this passes for art, maybe I should start a band in which all of the members play remotely and don't hear each other. When people say we suck, I'll tell them they just don't get it.