May 20, 2008
City Shutters Art Space, Locks Up Goldfish Inside
An automotive showroom for the R.L. Taylor Motor Company, a restaurant supplies retailer under Adams-Burch, and a Pentecostal chapel with the Church of the Rapture—the building that occupies the southwest corner of 14th and T Streets NW has served many people in many ways. Its most recent and perhaps improbable career turn—as a guerrilla art space hidden in the heart of one of D.C.'s fastest-rising commercial corridors—came to a close on Saturday.
Citing improper permits and fire hazards, city inspectors shut down "Here & Now," an art exhibit hosted by Transformer Gallery at the 1840 14th Street NW space. The temporary exhibit featured site-specific sculpture and installation art, some of it made using leftover odds and ends from the space.
“They were operating without a business permit, construction permits, and a whole boatload of other issues,” says Ken Wilson, chief fire inspector for the D.C. Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs. Wilson said that his office had received an anonymous tip that the building was being used to host auctions. He would not say who registered the complaint or when it was received.
Wilson arrived after inspector Kevin Smith and police interrupted artist Matt Mullican, who was giving a lecture about his work to a crowd of about two dozen people. (Mullican's work is not in the show.) The officials evacuated the building and summoned Dan Ford, a representative from Four Points LLC, the development company that owns the building. Ford then changed the keypad combination on the door.
Inspectors Wilson and Smith told Ford that the incident was serious and that the matter would almost certainly lead to a hearing. Wilson noted as an example that fire extinguishers within the building were expired as of 2003. (Ford had no comment for this story. DCRA had no record of complaints against the building since 2004; a representative was not immediately available for comment.)
The 14 artists in "Here & Now" whose work fills the space—many of whom were on hand for a day of artists' talks and dialogs—were not given an opportunity to claim their work before the building was sealed. It will remain closed for the foreseeable future.
“All of that work is basically being held hostage,” says Victoria Reis, director of Transformer, a nonprofit organization that promotes emerging artists. Transformer operates a storefront project space at 14th and P Streets NW, where a separate leg of the “Here & Now” sculpture exhibit is ongoing.
One of the works in “Here & Now” will die before the space is re-opened. An installation by Kyan Bishop and Kate Hardy features 100 goldfish in half-globes attached to the wall—none of which are going to last long without food.
“We're trying to get in for fish removal,” Hardy explains.
Photos by Flickr user Vincent Gallegos.
Nearly all the pieces in the show are site specific or site responsive and employ ephemeral, found, or low-cost materials—meaning that the pieces might not necessarily have any life after the show's run. But a few installations do feature fine artworks and crafted elements. As part of their collaborative piece, Graham Childs and Lily deSaussure hung hand-embroidered drawings in a built-out sunroom that includes their own home furniture.
The anonymous complaint that prompted the closure might have referred to an event put on by the Cultural Development Corporation (CuDC) three weeks ago. On May 3, CuDC held its Flashforward Gala and Auction, a live art auction benefit complete with dinner, music, an open bar, and dancing late into the night. For $175, attendees enjoyed the juxtaposition of drinks sponsored by SKYY Vodka and walls covered in graffiti.
Merin Frank, development associate for CuDC, said that a neighbor called the police the afternoon of the gala complaining that suspicious individuals were entering the building. Police checked out the space at that time and then again after midnight, when the same neighbor called to complain about music. CuDC also fielded a site visit from D.C.'s Alcoholic Beverage Regulation Administration, in response to a complaint that individuals were bringing alcohol into the building.
“When the police had stopped by and ABRA had stopped by, the moment we showed them everything was in order, they were fine with that, and they went on their merry way,” says Frank, noting that the caterer retained by CuDC showed ABRA a liquor license.
Reis says that Four Points had given Transformer a standard license agreement she recognized as one typically used by CuDC as a contract for the use of the space. She says that Transformer did not pay Four Points to rent the building, but the gallery did give the developer a $2,500 security deposit.
Frank says that Four Points donated the use of the space for the CuDC auction as well.
In January, Meat Market Gallery covered the building inside and out in graffiti to promote its second-annual Performance Week, a performance art series, which also took place in the building.
“There's a history of other organizations using the space,” said Reis. “How were we supposed to know about the building having problems?” Reis adds that Transformer spent hundreds of hours and several thousand dollars to assemble the show.
Not all the artists were bothered by the notion of the work being shut up inside the building.
“I feel that it's almost appropriate for it to be locked away, inaccessible,” said artist Mandy Burrow over email. For her piece, she arranged materials she found throughout the space as a diorama to recreate a linear, imagined history of the building—from tires to signify the building's origin on Washington's Automotive Row to a deli meat slicer and church pamphlets to represent its more recent incarnations.
“The objects and the entire piece are part of the building, and whatever becomes of the building should also determine the fate of that particular work,” said Burrow. “I see Saturday's occurrence as another chapter in the building—and thus the work's—life.”





Having lived in my fair share of converted warehouses -- of dubious permitting -- in other cities, this one more area of draconian measures by the DC government which makes being an artist in DC not really worth the trouble.
Similar buildings that I have watched deal with permit violations in other more arts-friendly cities, including buildings where my professors had live/work spaces, were at least given warnings, allowed to bring things up to code and/or were given a series of hearings on before things buildings were shut down and people separated from their stuff.
Complete over-reaction by the part of the DC government but its par for this course.
blame the ninja turtles for this one. they should have kept it under the radar on the outside. the awful mural brought too much attention to the space and pissed off the nieghbors.
I totally saw that party 3 weeks ago and wondered what the hell people dressed in fancy dresses and tuxes were doing in what appeared to me to be an abandoned warehouse. A really cool prom?
Anyway, it's a shame that because of code violations, a building showcasing art in the city had to be shutdown.
all those poor defenseless goldfish
The art shouldn't be locked up (think of the Goldfish, people! The Goldfish!) but is the District really in the wrong here? It seems like this is the fault of Four Points, the development company, for not properly maintaining a building that they allow people to hold events in.
I was going to voice my sympathy for the situation until I saw the word "Borf" painted on the side of the building.
Sucks for the innocent goldfish.
I've been in similar situations like this. Artist having a series of successful shows in a low-income to upincoming transitional neighorhood and after many uninterrupted events finally get nailed.
I don't believe DCRA is completely to blame. The over-reaction most likely comes from a newbie residential neighbor. Kinda reminds me of the new condo owners moving into Adams Morgan and complaining of the noise and nite-life on 18th Street.
These guys at least should have made sure their fire extinguishers were up to date.
erahk0
I agree with Rabo K...my guess is that if the folks using the space would not have been so flagrantly flaunting it on their exterior wall on one of the busiest streets in the city (14th Street), maybe they would not have attracted so much attention to themselves.
I thought the arts fartsy types liked being "underground" anyways.
It's all fun and giggles until the building burns down and/or someone is hurt inside.
It's not that hard, hipsters. Get the freaking permits already.
You can't complain about 'slumlord buildings' on one hand, then bitch when the city actually shows up to enforce safety codes.
DC sure does know how to ru(i)n a good party.
Instead of ensuring the safety of "residential" apartment buildings throughout the city (think Mt Pleasant 5 alarm fire), the DC govt decides to target an art show. Great job DC... way to choose your battles.
Again, I don't see how you can blame the artists in this case. They got the proper licenses from the developer:
Frank says that Four Points donated the use of the space for the CuDC auction as well.I feel like the blame falls entirely on Four Points. Am I missing something?
"I've been in similar situations like this. Artist having a series of successful shows in a low-income to upincoming transitional neighorhood and after many uninterrupted events finally get nailed."
Ehrm, 14th St. isn't transitional anymore. It has transitioned.
Can't compare this to an apartment building, this building is a quasi-commercial-Industrial zoned building made of concrete and masonry (likely no wood structural elements). So long as the electrical is sound, the only things that would burn inside these buildings are the sparse contents (presumably the art and furniture) and paint.
Sounds like this was not on the reg.s radar even with the mural. It was shut down only after a jealous neighbor called the fire marshals.
I think this is sudden and heavy handed as well..
but as for the goldfish, did the artist intend to give 100 goldfish a home for the several years (up to 20+ with a record of 43 years) they can live? Unlikely (though not impossible) so I think this is most likely just a fast-forward of their inevitable premature deaths.
Wow, you have obviously never tried to permit a commercial enterprise in this city.
Speaking as a former fireman, I think you would be very surprised at what will burn in a commercial building, especially one with ancient wiring, which this one surely has.
The poster complaining about the permit process has a legit point. But that is still no excuse for potentially endangering peoples lives.
I guarantee you the tipster was a neighbor who just didn't like that the building was being used for events. I'm sure he/she didn't give a rats ass about anyone's safety.
We've got a city full of residential apartment buildings that slumlords allow to crumble and this is the inspectors' priority?
Typical.
I'm the closest neighbor and I doubt any of the neighbors cared (though the ANC Commissioner lives across the street on T). I thought the ninja turtles graffiti was cool and better than the lame graffiti under it.
But I applied for a very, very basic permit three months ago and it still has not been granted, even though I eventually paid $1000 to a permit expediter -- this for a nonstructural, basic job that 99.99% of cities don't require permits for. So you're damned if you do......
"Won't someone PLEASE think of the goldfish!"
– Helen Lovejoy
"You can't complain about 'slumlord buildings' on one hand, then bitch when the city actually shows up to enforce safety codes."
Um, actually you can, when the city enforces them against artists having a good time and contributing to the cultural life of the city and NOT enforcing them against hundreds of moneyed slumlords or the politically connected.
Yes, I can complain.
The "no fire extinguishers/no permit" argument is horsehockey. Spare me. How about I kick your door down the next time you throw a party at a private space? And then lock you out because you don't have a working fire extinguisher?
What do officials in sane, well-run cities do? Give the involved parties a chance to remedy the so-called violation. They don't seal the effing building and lock everybody's stuff inside.
I love how this happened less than a stone's throw from Club U, which was allowed to operate after dozens of incidents of violence and police calls. And still, despite stabbings and a shooting death, it took the city two years to close it.
Can you say selective enforcement? Defending this governmental douchnozzlery with the "hipsters shoulda had a permit" argument is foolish and misinformed.
Does any one remember the Station Night Club - 100 dead caused in part by blocked or compromised exits - Beverly Hills Supper Club - 165 dead - again exit problems. Could go on and on. DC does not need that kind of reputation.
Not to mention the hew and cry that would be raised if one of those artsy fartsy types got wined up and fell down an open elevator shaft. and you think that Adrian has a mean streak? You ain't seen anything yet!