DCist T-Shirts
dcistshirt.jpg
About DCist

DCist is a website about Washington, D.C. More

Editor: Sommer Mathis Publisher: Gothamist

About | Advertising | Archive | Contact | Mobile | Photos | Staff | Subscribe

Categories
DCist Exposed Photography Show -- Feb 20-Mar 7
Favorites
Contribute

Latest tip:

There is a suspicious package being investigated near 12th and D St SW, in front of the new Homel [more]

 

Latest link:

 

Latest Photo:

 

Recent Comments
Subscribe
Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from DCist.
Overheard
Voting Rights
Public Calendar
Links

May 27, 2008

Schools Roundup – Stop, Look, and Listen Edition

chalk2.gifA Post editorial today notes that the most effective action Mayor Adrian Fenty has taken since assuming control of the D.C. public schools a little less than a year ago was to bring schools chancellor Michelle Rhee on board, remarking, “Michelle A. Rhee has done more in months to reshape the system than her predecessors did in years.” However, the editorial also cautions that it will be some time before any true achievement growth takes effect, and that the administration’s issues with transparency and heavy spending should be addressed. In another editorial that ran last week, the Post also cautioned the D.C. Council from interfering too heavily in Rhee’s reform efforts, arguing that, “district boundaries, community whim and political machinations would come into play” if Council proposals “micro-managing” schools decisions were to pass.

Scrapping Seniority: The education blogosphere, which already had its eyes on D.C., is abuzz this week following news that Rhee plans to eliminate teacher seniority in the new union contract that is currently being negotiated. Adding to the fray are escalating leadership tensions within the Washington Teachers’ Union between reform-minded WTU president George Parker and feisty, lawsuit-filing WTU vice-president Nathan Saunders. The issue at hand is Rhee’s proposal that senior teachers will not receive automatic hiring preference in exchange for increased paid leave and funding for supplies, and annual raises of around 6 percent. A union source told the Post that without seniority, teachers could be hired and placed based on “qualifications or performance rather than years of service.”

This is a big deal, and as one local teacher blogger points out, “For any school reform to have meaning, principals have GOT to have more autonomy over choosing their own staff.” However, within the WTU, the news is being spun by Saunders as a war against older teachers, and some have launched a movement to oust Parker. Andy Rotherham over at Eduwonk has more, including an email from a WTU member wondering if Saunders isn’t maybe a little out of control:

He stated that the chancellor hates "old" teachers and only wants to hire new teachers. Saunders (who apparently used to work at Ballou High School and was found asleep at his desk when then-superintendent Janey came around for observations) put a lot of effort into trying to create a rift between new and old teachers. He stated some made up economic numbers to show that young people would be flocking to take our jobs, since we make more money than the average starting salary of a college grad. He said the union's job is to make sure that every member has a job next school year and that there should be a hiring freeze. He talked about going to Congress or holding some type of protest and signing petitions against the union president. Saunders actually said (in addition to many other jabs at George Parker) "kill the President." The kicker for me in the meeting was when Saunders said it wouldn't help schools to have new teachers, because even though our reading scores are low- veteran teachers have relationships with students and this helps students to "keep from jumping off roofs."

Yikes.

Really Depressing: If you missed this piece last week, it’s worth a full read. A recent “quality school report” shows that very little learning was going on at all for students at the 27 schools that require overhaul under No Child Left Behind. For example, when a group of Dunbar Senior High School students were asked what they liked best about their school, one AP student replied, "Freedom. We can do whatever we want at this school. That's the only good thing about this place." A student at Lincoln Middle School said, “Teachers don't teach us a thing throughout the entire period. When visitors come, they start working." While this was an informal survey, not a serious study, the comments from these students are chilling. No student goes to school sincerely not wanting to learn, and the students interviewed are plainly frustrated at how little is asked of them. While NCLB is criticized for assessing based solely on test scores, these schools’ test scores are clearly indicative of problems that require attention.

Funding Changes: Yesterday Rhee announced that she is removing the “weighted student formula,” (WSF) a method implemented in the 1990s that awards funds to schools based on their enrollment, with provisions for the number of low-income or special-needs students. The funds were then allocated at each school with input from a group made up of parents, teachers and staff. The new method would maintain the per pupil element, but also require schools to fund positions such as art, music, and P.E. teachers, instead of allowing principals to decide which positions to fill. The WSF disfavored smaller schools, and gave disproportionate power to principals of schools with low parent involvement. However, some parents’ groups argue that this new system ignores their input and is a return to the top-down funding that has been rejected in the past.

Schools Notes: A fairly new anti-Rhee blog looks strangely similar to an anti-TFA blog that has been around for a while…great video of DCPS students being taught jazz by famous musicians…Marc Fisher examines what works at a high-performing District private school in Southeast that charges only $25 a month.

Email This Entry







Advertisement: DCist Continues Below!

Comments (7) [rss]

A union source told the Post that without seniority, teachers could be hired and placed based on “qualifications or performance rather than years of service.”

I can't think of anything funny to say about this.

This is gold, Jerry! GOLD!

 

If it's the veteran teachers that are keeping the kids from jumping off roofs, what are the guidance counselors doing?

And, yeesh, Monkey; if the union is upset by your pullquote, the schools are a twisted, twisted place. Performance? Who cares about that?

 

If Rhee gets rid of seniority, that will be an astounding accomplishment. But I can't imagine the current WTU president would survive a recall effort if that actually occurred.

The Post may love Rhee's reforms, but the true test will come via test scores. If there's no improvement - or if there are worse scores - in the next year or two, Rhee's going to lose lots of leverage and influence.

 

Hopefully, if Rhee's reforms don't improve test scores within the next few years, DCPS can go back to doing what they were doing before, whatever that was. I think it involved filing things in triplicate, losing them, and serving kids food riddled with insects and rat feces.

The Washington Teachers Union needs to go back to doing what it does best: looking the other way while Barbara Bullock robs them blind.

 

I'm a long-time DCPS teacher and WTU member who actually knew and liked Barbara Bullock. This was before we read in the papers that she betrayed us, stealing our dues. And BTW, none of us were aware that she was robbing us blind. Unlike many of my WTU colleagues, I don't mind the idea that we may lose what we call building or systemwide seniority. And I have it big time. I consider a valuable part of my school and don't merely stay in my job because of my seniority. I am good at what I do, the parents, principal and other teachers recognize that. In private industry, people get laid off all the time with only 2 weeks notice. Though I am not crazy about all that Rhee is doing, I have seen and heard teachers who don't teach, who just assign workbook pages for kids to do, yell shut up all day long and if they do get up, walk around in bedroom slippers. These individuals, and I won't call them educators, need to go home. Every school has a few of them and they have seniority, because they could never pass Praxis, or get hired in another school system. So they stay in DCPS not teaching, let alone inspiring. And my union protects them. At least Parker recognizes the fact the teachers' unions can no longer just worry about jobs, but about whether what we do impacts student learning. At least he is talking to Rhee and we may get a new contract. Nathan would never be able to negotiate anything for us, as he and Rhee are at loggerheads.

 

Chelita - I think you nail it here. It's not useful to cast the discussion in terms of old vs. young or veteran vs. new - what really matters is identifying, hiring and retaining the effective teachers.

 

Chelita - thanks for giving us an insider's honest and open viewpoint and for all your good service to the kids.

 
Post a comment (Comment Policy)

2003-2009 Gothamist LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use & Privacy Policy. We use MovableType.

Site Meter