DCist T-Shirts
dcistshirt.jpg
About DCist

DCist is a website about Washington, D.C. More

Editor: Sommer Mathis Publisher: Gothamist

About | Advertising | Archive | Contact | Mobile | Photos | Staff | Subscribe

Categories
Favorites
Contribute

Latest tip:

I emailed a pic of the clothes the streaker left on the street to Martin Andres Austermuhle. Unf [more]

 

Latest link:

 

Latest Photo:

 

Recent Comments
Subscribe
Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from DCist.
Overheard
Voting Rights
Public Calendar
Links

June 3, 2008

Schools Roundup – Right Thinking, Wrong Reasons

2008_0603_schooldesk.jpgCritics and watchdogs, in the best cases, help keep leaders honest and organizations accountable. The D.C. government has a number of them, particularly when it comes to the public schools. But sometimes rhetoric can overshadow reason, even if there is a legitimate point to be made, as was the case last week in a letter from the usual suspects to Council Chair Vincent Gray opposing nominations for researchers to conduct an independent evaluation of the schools takeover and Chancellor Michelle Rhee’s efforts.

There are a few legitimate concerns. The nominations are late, having arrived in April when expected in September, and the $750,000 over five years that the evaluation is expected to cost will come from a private organization, the Public Education Fund, instead of taxpayer money that would be subject to more transparency. But the biggest objection is that the researchers chosen are Kenneth Wong, chairman of the Brown University School of Education, and Frederick Hess, director of education policy at the American Enterprise Institute, both of whom have experience studying mayoral takeovers of school districts, but both of whom also are viewed by some as less than impartial. At a hearing last week, Gray noted that Wong testified in favor of the D.C. mayoral takeover legislation and that Hess published an op-ed supporting Rhee in the Washington Post last September. Does this mean that Wong and Hess are incapable of criticizing Rhee and Fenty when necessary, or that their expertise in mayoral control won’t be an asset? No, but they are concerns worth discussing.

However, the letter activists published also included the following charge against Hess:

AEI is the think tank that funded projects such as The Bell Curve, by AEI scholar Charles Murray, which caused outrage around the nation because of its racist conclusions that blacks are of inferior intelligence to whites and Asians, and The End of Racism, by Dinesh D'Souza, which declared that racism in the U.S. has ended and that the days of affirmative action are over. We should not be hiring such an institution's directors to judge the success of our school reform efforts.
Basically, they called Hess a racist.

Marc Dean Millot, the Education Week blogger who allowed the letter to fill his usual Friday guest column space last week, was rightfully annoyed, calling the attack, “McCarthyism from the left,” and in a follow-up post, argued that, “if your objective is to score political points with your own allies, it’s fun to smear people. But McCarthyism is not only unethical, it is a very poor strategy for winning the middle to your side. Indeed, if Dr. Hess is appointed to monitor DC school reform, one reason will be that the backlash to this ridiculous charge will swamp the substantive issue of conflicts.”

Watchdogs are one thing, but when advocates start to argue for the sake of attacking, it can warp the validity of some claims that actually should be heard. The council has yet to confirm nominations, but as the posts are supposed to be filled by September 15th, look for a decision within the next few weeks.

Building Plans Delayed Again: According to the Examiner, it seems that D.C. Schools Facilities Chief Alan Lew will not be able to release the master facilities plan, which details all plans to renovate deteriorating school buildings, until September, over a year past the initial deadline. According to Lew’s office, once the plan is released, community members will be able to weigh in.

Fenty has also announced his intent to solicit $75 million a year from private sector donations in order to buttress the $200 million renovation and maintenance budget, which he says isn’t enough to address the myriad building concerns in District schools. Fenty’s begging from business is irritating to Post columnist Colbert I. King, who points to the $56 million in pork recently passed in the city’s budget for groups like Ford’s Theater and the National Building Museum. “The mayor and council members elected to give away 75 percent of the sum the private sector has been asked to cough up to fix the schools,” King writes. “If public education matters so much, why didn't His Honor and his council henchmen -- oops, henchpersons -- spend the $56 million on the school system instead of giving it to every grant-seeking groupie in a 10-mile radius?”

Schools Notes: Chancellor Rhee signs autographs after describing eating a bee…resident argues for work study, grants and need-based financial aid to those who want to teach in the public schools…Private St. Albans beats public Wilson HS in the Congressional Bank Baseball Classic…Donors Choice, a great program which matches donors’ dollars to specific projects in local classrooms, forms partnership with DCPS.

Email This Entry







Advertisement: DCist Continues Below!

Comments (5) [rss]

Fuck the AEI:
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=American_Enterprise_Institute

 

There are definitely reasons to criticize AEI (by the way, most people don't refer to it as "the" AEI, the same way people call it "Brookings", not "the Brookings"). But that sourcewatch page reads like the work of a college sophomore late for an assignment for his Peace Studies course.

AEI is biased certainly. But so is Brookings, and every other think tank in this town. I think a lot of their conclusions are wrong, but they're not the corporate shills that that sourcewatch page makes them out to be.

Now when it comes to being an absolute shill for corporate interests, no one tops the Competitive Enterprise Institute (which as far as I know, has no relationship with AEI). CEI is shameless and has little intellectual honesty.

 

Wow. That's a terribly dishonest line of critique.

As a liberal who has worked very closely with AEI scholars, I can say that there's a fairly broad range of opinion among the people there. (I challenge you to next call Norm Ornstein a right-wing hack.)

Think what you will of Murray and D'Souza (and, yes, even within AEI there are people who find the works mentioned above to be quite distasteful), Hess's work is completely unrelated.

The appointments, and the recipients thereof, are probably better evaluated on their own merits.

 

Other AEI scholars:
Newt Gingrich
John R. Bolton
Robert Bork
David Frum
Paul Wolfowitz
Lynne Cheney
Alan Keyes
Irving Kristol
Richard Perle
Fred Thompson
John Yoo

Not the broadest range of opinion. And for the record you wouldn't say "Fuck American Enterprise Institute", you would say "Fuck the American Enterprise Institute"

 

d@mn your bitter!

 
Post a comment (Comment Policy)

2003-2008 Gothamist LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use & Privacy Policy. We use MovableType.

Site Meter