June 27, 2008
Out of Frame: My Winnipeg
An unnamed couple takes a romantic stroll among the frozen horse-heads. It'll all make perfect sense -- maybe -- after you've seen Guy Maddin's My Winnipeg. |
It's not really a documentary. It's not exactly a memoir. It is ingenious and poetic. Frequently it's apeshit hilarious. But, like, what the hell is this thing?
Guy Maddin’s dreamy, beguiling My Winnipeg opens with the iconoclastic filmmaker employing the most loathsome directorial tactic there is: The camera fixes on the face of his leading lady while we hear him giving her line readings. Nothing, nothing more offends an actor’s ear than when a director tells them to say the line exactly like this. No prob, though, because the actress here is Maddin’s mother. Except she’s not his mother, she’s an actress named Ann Savage. And if contradiction is a problem for you, My Winnipeg is most decidedly not your movie.
Give in to Maddin’s “docu-fantasia,” though, and you'll find your adventurousness rewarded tenfold. Ostensibly a first-person account of the filmmaker's last attempt to leave behind his lifelong hometown —“the heart of the heart of the continent” in his lilting, alliterative narration -- it's really Maddin's mash note to the place, one sprinkled liberally with fun facts about the sleepy city's history. Along with some other stuff that — I’m guessing here, folks — Maddin just made up. Indeed, to go through and fact-check some of his more outlandish claims, like that his mom used to star in a daily suicide soap-opera called Ledge Man wherein the main character almost leapt to his death five times a week for years; or that Winnipeg’s mayor used to judge the über-gay Golden Boy contest and then offer the winners cushy jobs in his office, would be a fun project, though probably exhausting and definitely contrary to the spirit of the enterprise.
I don’t know Maddin’s prior work, but I'm told the entrancing editorial technique he uses here of combining well-chosen archival footage with newly shot stuff manipulated to make it look old — and, hilariously, with silent-movie title cards — is part of his standard filmic vocabulary. He certainly operates like no one else I can think of; Orson Welles’s F for Fake is the only other hoaxumentary (focumentary?) I’ve ever seen that’s remotely like this, and Welles’ adventurous editing of that picture seems a natural precursor to Maddin’s own impressionistic style.
Welles’ brilliant film — the only picture other than Citizen Kane that he ever completed to his satisfaction — was initially received as another of Welles’s colossal fuckups upon its initial release in 1974; it’s now hailed as a masterpiece. But in an age when “reality” TV rules the airwaves and Oprah self-righteously lambastes James Frey for making up bits of his autobiography, Maddin’s film, for all its wry shout-outs to the silent era, couldn't possibly be more timely.
I doubt it’s his main intent to satirize the dreary reenactments and reality shows that hold such dominion over American TV, but at least one of his stunts works like gangbusters on that level: Sensing a need to solve some mystery of identity rooted in his childhood, Maddin rents out his childhood home from its current owner, and convinces his mother-who-isn’t to move back into it with him for a month. But his brothers are too old to recreate their roles, so he hires two teenage actors to fill in. At the last second, the woman who now lives in the house refuses to leave, so she too becomes a part of the reconstructed family. Just to keep things thoroughly confused, Maddin is himself played by an actor — not just in this section of the film, but throughout.
The rest of the movie plays like a promotional video from the Greater Winnipeg Conventions and Tourism Bureau, assuming that everyone in the Bureau observes a strict diet of moose meat and hallucinogenic drugs, and that Winnipeg is located somewhere in the Bizarro World. (Oh, right. Canada.) And so: Taxi companies that travel only via secret byways! Frozen horse-heads with aphrodisiac properties! Old signage graveyards! "Urine, breast milk, and sweat: the hockey industry's Holy Trinity of odors." And then there's Maddin's observation-as-mantra that Winnipeg's shape suggests a woman's unclothed lap. (I can kind of see it. Okay, actually I can't see it, really, at all. But it is absolutely the most original rationale for female nudity onscreen since, well, ever.)
It’s a tribute to the singular wavelength of Maddin’s humor, and to the dizzying inventiveness of his storytelling, that a film supposedly inspired by a lifetime of failed attempts to leave his hometown kind of makes you want to visit.
My Winnipeg (85 minutes) opens today at the AFI Silver Theater. See the trailer here; buy tickets here. It pairs well with Realisms, the just-opened second half of the Hirshhorn Museum’s visionary The Cinema Effect exhibit, with which it is spiritually simpatico. Unrated; contains frontal female nudity in a cartographic context. Navigational discretion advised.





[ report this ]
Yeah, but did you like the movie? Because from the review, I can't tell one way or the other. But if it's anything close to F for Fake, this sounds like something you're definitely either going to love or hate. It's one of my favorite Welles films, but damned if I can get anyone else to sit through it. And as for this:
contains frontal female nudity in a cartographic context.
I'm sure most people would have a hard time jerking off to this, but most people aren't IMGoph. I predict his highest rating ever: "Nine Compasses Up!"
[ report this ]
"Ingenious and poetic."
"Apeshit hilarious."
" . . . you'll find your adventurous rewarded tenfold."
Does it sound like I didn't like the movie?
No star system here, MonkeyErotica. You gotta read.
(I'm with the Goph. Nine compasses sounds about right.)
[ report this ]
Can anyone tell me if the frozen horseheads are real in this movie? They are seriously keeping me from eating ice cream or other frozen novelties, and every single review has had a picture of them.
I loved Dracula and The Saddest Music in the World, but the frozen horseheadpocalypse is giving me the willies. The willies, I tell you!
[ report this ]
I saw this at Silverdocs last week. Dull Dull Dull Dull Dull boring and dull. Which I can only hope is the feeling he was deliberately trying to convery about Winnipeg. Really, this is not a good movie. Yes, the historical contexting is interesting, and some of the cinematography is creative... but the repetitive meditations numb the brain rather than stimulate it.
If you are a movie connoisseur who wants to try something different, then check it out. Otherwise, there are better choices out there.
[ report this ]
all i have to ask is this:
why, god, has it taken you this long to release a movie with nudity in a cartographic context. it's like they're niche marketing things directly to me! i feel really special right now.
[ report this ]
I'm waiting patiently for the day when it's male full frontal nudity in a cartographic context. As a cartographer I'd be happy to assist with the making of the map. I'm particularly good at drawing Florida.
[ report this ]
Smitty's right. drink coffee and get ready for a long murmured monologue, punctuated by all-too-short hallucinatory vignettes with dialogue. Pretty camerawork and scenery just dont counteract the anesthetic pacing, map-of-the-bush notwithstanding.
[ report this ]
I'll keep the positives up front:
-Although the frontal nudity was not full (and that's good, if it was the front of who I think it was), it was the coolest metaphor in a movie that was miles long on metaphor.
- He introduced me to a few legal facts, historical episodes and states of civil engineering re: Winnipeg that I found very interesting.
Have some negatives:
- It is hard to tell if any of the interesting things were true. I suspect they are total bullshit.
- If you tend to find depictions of homoerotic situations cringe-tastic, this one has some championship wincers, and in no small number either. If you find depictions of homoerotic situations "stimulating" you will probably like this one as much as the guy several seats over from me with the mustache and the sandals, who's heavy breathing gave me more to wince at.
- There was a lot of self-pity in this film. His sense of being trapped and persecuted by his mother is the central theme of this sad-ass movie. That was not a positive feature. If she sucks so bad, just stop calling her back. Try it.
- I'm not sure if the intersticial sequences of sleeping people in train cars was intended to refer to amatuerish film-making techniques of the pre-war period, or if the high-school-drama-production type quality was the best he could pull off. Either way, it sucked and made the movie worse for making me sit through it.
- His narration was way too often way too poetical. And the poetry was uniformly garbage. I dont care if he thought he was being ironic with it. It sucked.
Conclusion:
- I saw a Neil Young doc where he talked about growing up not far from Winnipeg, and starting his music career there. I sort of dont think that Neil Young and Guy Maddin lived in the same Winnipeg. I am grateful to now know better than to ever watch another Guy Maddin film. Boooooo.