DCist T-Shirts
dcistshirt.jpg
About DCist

DCist is a website about Washington, D.C. More

Editor: Sommer Mathis Publisher: Gothamist

About | Advertising | Archive | Contact | Mobile | Photos | Staff | Subscribe

Categories
Favorites
Contribute

Latest tip:

And because there are so many unruly people in such a small space, the cops get caught up with th [more]

 

Latest link:

 

Latest Photo:

 

Recent Comments
Subscribe
Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from DCist.
Overheard
Voting Rights
Public Calendar
Links

July 8, 2008

Schools Roundup: Money Where Your Mouth Is Edition

2008_0708_salary.jpgIf you’re not already familiar with the way teachers in D.C. get paid, it basically works like this – the longer you teach, the more you make. DCPS teachers are compensated on a seniority-based scale (pdf), something that was designed to encourage retention, but unfortunately also means that teachers are paid for their loyalty, not their performance.

D.C. Schools Chancellor Michelle Rhee has often said that she wants the District to have “the most highly compensated and competent" teachers in the country, and now, in a move being simultaneously praised as “revolutionary” among reformers and reviled as “a bribe” by critics, she has proposed a new contract that would give teachers an opportunity to earn over $100,000 a year in exchange for giving up their rights to seniority and tenure.

Teachers who choose to join the “green” tier under the new contract would be eligible for thousands of dollars in bonuses and raises (funded by groups like the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation) for meeting student achievement goals, but would also be subject to yearly performance reviews –that is, more money for more accountability. If teachers want to hang on to their traditional pay scale and tenure, they simply opt out of the new plan and stay in the “red” tier.

The Post editorial board absolutely loves the idea, writing this morning, “Instead of facing the loss of promising teachers to better-paying jobs in the suburbs, the city would be able to fashion an exciting new workforce in which positive results -- and the teachers who bring them about -- are rewarded,” and even lamenting that the plan is voluntary. “Indeed, we wonder whether the proposal is overly generous, in that ineffective teachers, no matter their seniority, should not be tolerated, much less rewarded with raises.”

We’re all for the best teachers making six figures, yet this plan raises questions too, such as how student achievement should be measured (progress over a year? a single high-stakes test?) and how to ensure the fairness of teacher evaluations. For example, Ms. Angela, blogging over at Special Education Teacher in Washington, DC, wonders how her SPED students will be treated under the plan.

Simply put, this is a really big deal, but will hinge on the reactions of the local and national teachers' unions, some of whom have shown a knee-jerk response against merit-based pay in the past. However, if implemented successfully, Rhee’s new contract will likely spark similar pay reforms in school districts across the nation.

750 Unqualified Educators Fired: Speaking of accountability, also last week, Rhee fired 250 teachers and 500 teacher’s aides who had failed to meet the June 30 certification deadline, a deadline that had already been extended twice since 2005. With the firings, DCPS, which has traditionally operated with a large percentage of uncertified educators, is finally in compliance with the “highly-qualified” requirements of the No Child Left Behind law, under which teachers must have at least a bachelor's degree in the subject they teach and pass a test demonstrating their knowledge in that area, while aides need a high school diploma and must pass an exam.

According to coverage in the Post and Examiner, the firings will not disrupt the coming school year, as the educators in question were not expected to meet the deadline, and were consequently not assigned to any classrooms.

Forty-five Principals Hired: After conducting a nation-wide principal search, DCPS has hired 45 new principals who will take over many of the District’s failing schools. In a profile, the Post calls them Rhee’s “Army of Believers,” citing the idealism and relentless expectations that characterize the recent hires, and reporting that about half of them will fill positions vacated by Rhee’s firing of principals earlier this summer. The new school leaders said Rhee’s office had “made it plain that that they will exit through the same door if they don't deliver.”

Schools Notes: Sec. of Education Margaret Spellings continues to grandstand for D.C. vouchers… City Desk points out some of the casualties of recent budget cuts at Ballou High School… D.C. council chairman Vincent Gray seeks testimony on the confusion over school construction contracts.

Email This Entry







Advertisement: DCist Continues Below!

Comments (11) [rss]

Like fine wine, Andy Rooney, and bangin grannies, DCPS teachers only improve with age. Ask any illiterate kid in the city jail.

 

it promising to see that chancellor rhee followed through on the threat to remove teachers who did not meet the minimum qualifications. gotta have standards and accountability, and it looks like DCPS is heading that way.

 

I love the zeal that Rhee is bringing to the table in regards to education reform. I hope she is successful. It's about time someone took action along with words and I still can't beleive all of this has been happenning.

 

But if you remove those 750 unqualified teachers, what about the children?

 

I agree. We should remove the children unqualified to live a normal life and put them on an island off the Eastern Shore.

 

Boomhauer- can we really do that? I'd like to start with a little ex-con-to-be who was running into traffic on 14th street in Columbia Heights wielding a can of spray paint as his companions ran to catch up with him (nearly missing oncoming cars in the process).

But seriously, I think Rhee is definitely on the right track. My only issue is that there are going to be some places where student achievement is always going to be low because of the child's home environment. What we'd be doing is basically creating a system where teachers who already teach in better DCPS schools will simply be earning more money than those who care enough to teach in some of the city's poorest communities.

 

cranky: did you read the article? those teachers were already not assigned to any classroom, so they weren't affecting the learning of any children (in either a negative or positive way).

 

I'm a DCPS teacher not at all upset with Rhee's firing of over 700 uncertified aides and teachers. Most of those individuals could not pass the Praxis (for teachers) and the test on about an 8th grade level for aides. Rhee was mandated by federal legislation to do so and she did. But I am not sure I will be taking her up on her offer to be on the green tier, provided this proposed contract is voted in by WTU membership, which is not a done deal at all. Getting rid of seniority has about 0% support among teachers, and I have friends from around the city all saying the same thing.
Some posters have mentioned that there are still many questions left unanswered about the new bonus package. Also Miss Angala on her blog, one of those super Filipina special ed teachers that both DCPS and PGPS have recruited, asks about how her students' progress would be measured and how that would be tied into a bonus for SPED teachers. Also what about special subject teachers, who are part of the teachers' bargaining unit, yet their programs are not as directly connected to student achievement as general ed classroom teachers. I mean music, art, PE, librarians and others in schools. And of course, kids at John Eaton or Murch are probably 90% proficient in reading and math school wide, while kids at Davis ES, Savoy ES in SE, I would guess are much lower. It sure seems that it will be easier for teachers at a so-called good school to have great test scores compared to teachers in the trenches in high poverty schools. Just some thoughts.

 

Good points, Chelita, and also DCist for mentioning the difficult issues of measurement and fairness. If my recent experiences with DCPS under Rhee are any indication, those two very valid points have not even been considered, much less addressed. I get the impression Rhee's pulling the trigger without first checking to see where the gun is aimed. She's under a lot of pressure to show results in less time than other reform efforts are given, so don't be surprised if/when half-assed plans hit the Post.

 

Its hard to fix the DC public schools without somehow addressing the root of the problems. I think that root is the home environment. No matter how good a teacher may be, if the child has no support structure or discipline at home, there will be problems their learning environment. How do you teach parenting skills?

 

"Revolutionary" does not begin to adequately credit the brilliance of the green tier contract or merit the exemplery planning and committment Rhee has put forth to improving DC's public schools in only a year as the superintendent of DC public schools. Growing up in Montgomery County, I was fortunate to have parents who valued my education and could afford the property taxes of a better school district. We specifically moved from one end of Rockville to another when I was in the 2nd grade to change our high school cluster. At the time I thought it a very unneccessary and selfish move on the part of my baby brother--being born so we would no longer have a guest room. I didn't begin to understand until maybe 8th grade or so the significance of such luxury.

In speaking to many of my teachers over those years, I found that the majority of them were working for MCPS because the salary was higher (one of the highest in the country, I believe), but they could not, even on this higher salary, afford to live within the county themselves. These men and women, who are of presumably a higher professional integrity to be able to demand the "better" public school teacher's salary are not able to offer their own children a quality education because they cannot afford the real estate, or find that they would much rather raise their child in a house in a kid-friendly neighborhood in Frederick County than a apartment complex in Gaithersburg. Perhaps their personal interference and encouragement in their child's education will be enough.

The green tier system will radically improve DCPS without raising taxes or jeopardizing current employees' tenure status. Rhee's already made the bold and confident move to eradicate the many educators who were undercertified, with the expectation that the new salary system will bring new blood rolling in. It will be interesting to see how this affects the surrounding counties' pool of educators, teachers already in the area may want to take advantage of their proximity to DC. Hopefully those individuals who are willing to take the jump with this new system will be exactly the type of risk-taking educators DCPS needs.

The methods of evaluating student achievement and progress is of course, of greatest concern, and clearly Rhee is still working through the many options to find the most fair and effective means to do so. I wouldn't be at all surprised if she comes out with a brilliant and radical new form of non-standard achievement testing as well.

 
Post a comment (Comment Policy)

2003-2008 Gothamist LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use & Privacy Policy. We use MovableType.

Site Meter