August 5, 2008
Schools Roundup: Summertime (and the Living’s Not So Easy)
August is a mixed blessing – summer school is over and the afternoons are long, but teachers and students alike are aware that the first day of school is only a few weeks away. August should be a time for relaxation and preparation, but tempers have been running high for such a normally lazy month. The Washington Teachers’ Union and D.C. public schools are still locked in a stalemate over contract negotiations, the Mayor’s office is playing tug-of-war with the D.C. Council over the schools budget, and the Post is editorializing about all of it. Maybe it’s the heat.
But these aren’t just any contract negotiations – they hinge on D.C. Schools Chancellor Michelle Rhee’s controversial merit pay proposal, which would dramatically shift the way District teachers are paid and evaluated should they choose to participate. Last week, following a series of emotional Q&A meetings with teachers, the WTU emailed its members a 37 page packet detailing the raises and bonuses teachers would be eligible for should the plan be adopted. George Parker, the WTU president, cautioned that no agreements have been reached on issues of seniority and tenure since the contract talks resumed last Wednesday. Rhee, however, told the Newshour that the negotiations were close to being finished.
For you DCist policy wonks, details of the performance pay proposal are below the jump. The rest of you, go buy some tax-free school supplies for the students (or teachers) in your life.

This is a chart included in the WTU information packet. It offers a snapshot comparing the “red” and “green” tiers offered under Rhee’s proposal. New DCPS teachers will join the system under the “green” tier.
Should the proposal pass, teachers who choose the “red” tier will be eligible for salary increases up to 28 percent over the next five years, in addition to two $5,000 “reform stipends” in 2009 and 2010, “in recognition of the challenges associated with serving during this period of transition.”
The “green” option basically offers more money in exchange for more accountability. Teachers would receive salary increases of up to 20 percent over the next five years, in addition to the $10,000 in “reform stipends.” But the key here is that "green" teachers would also be eligible for up to $20,000 in performance-based bonuses (criteria for which are still being determined, but will likely be based on value-added student achievement and for teaching high-needs subjects.)
The Post breaks down the two options as follows:
“Under [the 'red'] scenario, a teacher with a bachelor's degree and 10 years of service who makes $56,000 could receive $73,800 by 2012. A teacher with the same experience and a master's degree could receive $84,400 in salary and bonuses… Under the second option, the annual salary and bonuses for a teacher with five years of experience could go from as little as $46,500 to as much as $101,000 by 2010. Pay for a teacher with 10 years of service could jump from $56,200 to as much as $122,500.”The major point of controversy is that the plan asks teachers to give up seniority and tenure rights. For example, if a school were to close, teachers who have been in DCPS longer would not automatically be given new hiring preference over teachers with less time in the District, which leaves hiring decisions entirely up to principals. Before being fired, “teachers unable to find a principal to hire them could opt for early retirement, a $25,000 buyout or a year's grace period -- with salary and benefits -- to continue searching,” reports the Post. Also, teachers who work under the “green” tier will be subject to a year of probation, with new teachers staying on probation for four years, and will require a principal’s recommendation before being given permanent status. If teachers are deemed unsatisfactory, they would be dismissed with none of the buyout options described above.
Teachers, what are you thinking, should the plan be approved? Red or green?
Schools Notes: The Cancer Project criticizes DCPS for its use of processed meats in cafeteria food… City Paper has a fascinating look at the history left behind when schools close… rising fuel costs puts DCPS $600K over budget during the 2007-08 school year in order to operate its 727 buses… A photo of a school official with a big gun inspires some unfortunate caption suggestions.




[ report this ]
those are some old-school ten dollah bills, yo
[ report this ]
How many hours are in a standard work day for a DCPS teacher? As I recall in NYC it is (or at least used to be) six hours. Also how many weeks of work per year? If you compare these figures with people who work 40 hours per week and 48 to 50 weeks a year (not to mention some professions where people work 60 to 80 hours per week) these figures even higher than they appear.
[ report this ]
Sumergocognito, DC public schools are in session 8:45-3:15; I imagine most teachers arrive at 8 and leave at 4 at a bare minimum, and that's not counting time spent planning, prepping, grading, and working with students and parents outside of school. Good teachers work a great many more than forty hours a week -- and the purpose of this plan is to lose or reform the bad ones.
[ report this ]
I was listening to George Parker on Kojo's show two weeks ago (Marc Fischer was sitting in for Kojo) and I was surprised to hear him say that this fight is basically between older black teachers and young non-black teachers. I'm not that surprised that it is, I was just kind of surprised he actually said it.
[ report this ]
llemma is correct sumergocognito atleast from what my kid experiences @ DCPS.
Some teachers even coach kids after hours and during recess and my kid benefitting from being an excellent student has stayed after school for fun stuff sponsored by good teachers. There are some good apples in a system that definitely needs sorting out.
[ report this ]
Any teacher who votes against the plan would have to be a an ignorant fool. If they really don't believe in merit pay or have any fears they can just go red plan, get a 28% pay increase and everything for them stays the same. If they vote down the plan they will get no raise and be in the same boat. So why not vote this plan through?
Every opposition I read (usually from WAPO reader comments) just comes off as a bunch of people having conspiracy theories and a serious lack of knowledge regarding the plan.
[ report this ]
You might be right tmoney about who the pyscho's are but i'm sure there's a bunch of people who are simply afraid of change and facing accountability for the first time.
I'm hope many of them (presuming some are teachers) can find a way to get over it.
[ report this ]
@tmoney
i agree that teachers should vote yes, and your question is a good one, but here's the rub:
giving up seniority/tenure is a BFD for teachers (especially older ones) who are willing to forgo pay increases so they can keep or bump others for spaces at the 'most desirable' schools to teach in (i.e. fewer 'trouble kids,' etc.)
[ report this ]
My mistake: it was Nathan Saunders, not George Parker, who depicted this as a racial conflict on Kojo's show.
From what I've briefly read about the guy, I guess I shouldn't have been surprised.
[ report this ]
WTU president George Parker's above-mentioned observation is probably correct. I'm a DCPS teacher, not black and really hope that this plan becomes a tentative agreement so that we can vote it in. I am a DCPS teacher with several years of experience. But a more accurate description is that this proposal is supported by younger teachers (many non-black) and opposed by older ones, most of who are black. Those veteran DCPS teachers who have no problem passing the Praxis have nothing to be afraid of. Those of us who are computer literate have nothing to fear. Those of us who are valued by our principals because we're smart, creative, hard-working and adore our kids instead of bad-mouthing them have nothing to worry about. Rhee has opened up a big can of worms and is really going to the heart of school reform, getting rid of dead weight teachers. While there are many excellent ones, I've seen the others too.
[ report this ]
Ohmigash!! It was not George Parker, but Nathan Saunders who made the racial comments, while a bit bold, weren't that incorrect. That makes much more sense. He HATES Rhee and wants her and everthing she proposes to fail. Additionally, Saunders wants to run for WTU president, as Parker is too much in Rhee's pocket, according to his crew of older, black, old-school DCPS teachers. But Rhee is the mascot for the new wave in urban education. It's being taken out of the hands of the black middle class or wish they were middle class women and being taken over by TFA save the world types.
[ report this ]
@Vmad giving up seniority/tenure is a BFD for teachers (especially older ones) who are willing to forgo pay increases so they can keep or bump others for spaces at the 'most desirable' schools to teach in (i.e. fewer 'trouble kids,' etc.)
Well tenure would have nothing to do bumping people. And as mentioned before anyone going red maintain tenure and those going green only have one year of probation before regaining tenure.
Seniority no longer plays a large roll in the system. While it may give an edge to otherwise identical candidates, it no longer plays a large roll in the system like it once did.
In regards to keeping spaces - from Michelle Rhees mouth courtesy of DC Teacher Chic
It’s a misperception that seniority currently guarantees security with RIFING [Reduction-in-Force] – it doesn’t.
[ report this ]
@Reid - I heard those same comments on the Kojo show and wasn't surprised. It's clear there's a major civil war brewing between the older teachers and the younger ones, and it's volatile b/c of race and class. Parker is the way of the future; Saunders is the old school "picket & protest." Saunders & Co.'s odd complaint that Rhee is disrespecting them by talking directly to teachers, rather than to the WTU executive committee and delegates committee is just idiotic. Do they realize how silly they look in complaining that Rhee's going directly to the membership rather than the multiple levels of bureaucracy in the teachers union?