September 2, 2008
Schools Roundup: Special Needs Edition
One of the largest financial sinkholes for the D.C. government is that the city pays for approximately one quarter of its 9,400 special education (SPED) students to attend private school, to the tune of more than $200 million. Why the expense? Because the city’s public and public charter schools have thus far proved incapable of addressing those students’ learning needs. It’s a situation that doesn’t seemed to have improved over the past two years, according to a dismal new report from a federal court monitor who was appointed in 2006 to assess the District’s ability to eliminate a backlog of more than 1,000 SPED cases that were delaying placement for SPED students.
While the city has eliminated that original 1,000, more than 400 new cases have lingered beyond a 150 day deadline that was implemented under the class action suit, Blackman v. District of Columbia. The monitor writes, “the Defendants have not come close to meeting the Consent Decree's objective performance benchmarks,” and points a finger at D.C. schools chancellor Michelle Rhee, suggesting that with her many reform initiatives and “irons in the fire” she was “not able to provide this unifying leadership and management.”
The legal and practical bureaucracy of special education in public schools has long been problematic for the District, and the rising costs of educating SPED students privately led Mayor Fenty to ask the D.C. Council for an additional $9 million in tuition and transportation costs for those students. Without it, and another $6 million for textbooks and maintenance supplies, the school system will be over budget when the fiscal year ends later this month.
Photo by M.V. Jantzen
Contract Negotiations Linger On: In a voicemail to Washington Teachers’ Union members over the weekend, WTU president George Parker announced that negotiations with DCPS over the controversial news teachers’ contract will continue this week, and that a town hall meeting for all WTU bargaining members is being organized to discuss all proposals. Last week, Parker sent another message, backing off of a NBC4 story in which Parker implied that an illegal teachers’ strike isn’t out the question if Rhee imposes accountability reforms without the union.
Last week, Rhee hinted at a “plan B” if the contract didn’t go through, which Education Week blogger Stephen Sawchuk predicts would probably have to do with instituting a system that “provides schools with more flexibility in hiring and placing teachers, and that would tie licensure to a teacher-effectiveness measure.” Such a revision would have to be approved by the D.C. State Board of Education and be open to a public comment period, during which you can expect Nathan Saunders to be crying foul.
Schools Notes: D.C. State Board of Education President Robert Bobb not to seek re-election… Rhee’s back to school letters to teachers and parents… SAT reading, math, and writing scores for area students are released… Anacostia High School football coach Willie Stewart to retire after 40 years and 200 winning games.





[ report this ]
Well, first thing to do is to figure out if these kids are really disabled. Currently, one out of every five kids in DCPS is classified as requiring special education. That must rank us close to top in the nation. The problem is, from what I understand from teachers, that "special education" is often a codeword "discipline problems". Instead of trying to determine how many kids are in these private special education programs, how about worrying which ones are actually benefiting from them? If they're not benefiting, then we shouldn't be paying for it.
[ report this ]
A child is not labeled Special Ed because a parent or teacher wants him to be. The designation is arrived at after a team of specialists study the child's case, test him, interview him, his family and teachers, and then arrive at a specific classification. It's not a codeword for discipline problems, although by the time many disabled kids reach middle and high school, you might as well add "BD" (behavioral disabilities) to the list. I've seen too many kids spend years being so frustrated by their disabilities that they compensate by acting out.
Given the dysfunctional environments many of the DCPS students are raised in -- from prenatally to present day -- the 20% figure strikes me as low, frankly.
[ report this ]
And another thing...
Michelle skipped me in her email (don't worry, I'll get over it), but I'd like to take her up on her offer to "fight to bring every support to schools that you and your students need." Um, can we have some paper, please? And a copier that works? Is that too much to ask?
[ report this ]
Tough spot for Rhee to be in - if she focused on fixing the special education system, she would have less time to devote to reforming the entire system. However by lagging behind setting up a certifiable DC special education program, the city continues to spend disproportionate amounts of money on busing, legal fees and private tuition that otherwise could serve many more DCPS students. Isn't this a major reason why DC spends so much on schools (on par with Fairfax and Montgomery in 2005) for seemingly so little in results?
[ report this ]
Given the dysfunctional environments many of the DCPS students are raised in -- from prenatally to present day -- the 20% figure strikes me as low, frankly.
Just another reason to gentrify the hell out of the city, and spread some of the poverty and dysfunction around to other jurisdictions. The District just can't continue to be a ghetto for all the region's social ills--VA and MD need to step up and take on more of the burden.
Um, can we have some paper, please? And a copier that works? Is that too much to ask?
Sorry, all but all that money went to private schools in Northern Virginia (by federal court order) because 20% of the DCPS students were neglected and subsisted on lead paint-chips during their first two years of life.
[ report this ]
"A child is not labeled Special Ed because a parent or teacher wants him to be. The designation is arrived at after a team of specialists study the child's case, test him, interview him, his family and teachers, and then arrive at a specific classification"
Maybe not where you come from but they certainly are labeled as such because DCPS schools heavily lobby low income parents to allow them to label their kid special needs.
A DCPS school gets a lot of lucre for this. You may read that DCPS spends $13,000 per student. Nope. If your kids is not subsidized breakfast and lunch, is not ESL and is not special needs the school only gets $4,850 for him.