DCist: Are You Ready for More Pants?

Moose

Fri, 12 Sep 2008 10:33:01 -0500

Monkey, there's already a Blade III, so that would have to be Blade IV.

Disco Stu

Fri, 12 Sep 2008 10:05:37 -0500

Um... Doesn't he still owe the Chungs for there legal fee from the first time? So, if he has funding to go after an a appeal, shouldn't he also have funds to cough over? Just sayin...

monkeyrotica

Fri, 12 Sep 2008 06:23:06 -0500

I really want Wesley Snipes to play Roy Pearson in Blade III: Gimme Back My Goddamned Pants. I mean, he's gotta be a vampire. Nothing can stop him. Not even the Chung's extra-garlickey kimchi.

Public Relations

Fri, 12 Sep 2008 01:57:32 -0500

Perhaps if the Appeals court did overturn the decision - that would justify his lawsuit against wrongful termination. He is probably hoping a favorable verdict would aid him in getting his job back or at least compensation

ClevelandRocks

Thu, 11 Sep 2008 23:04:15 -0500

I have a theory about this. The man is incredibly vain about his legs. J-Lo level of vanity. Maybe he was a male leg model before law school.

downtown rez

Thu, 11 Sep 2008 19:45:42 -0500

Why Barry? Doesn't Novak still have a license?

monkeyrotica

Thu, 11 Sep 2008 19:38:32 -0500

"Hi, I'm Roy Pearson. You may remember me from such travesties as 'The Verdict Was Mailfraud" and 'Tinker, Taylor, Plaintiff, A**hole.'"

erahk0

Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:54:51 -0500

Forget Gallerie Place. Judiciary Square needs a marquee for this one ......"Judge Roy Pearson and the Cronys are back for one show!".....

Sommer Mathis

Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:28:01 -0500

Yep that's right, it's the D.C. Court of Appeals.

MikeB

Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:31:31 -0500

Greatest. Country/state/city/fiefdom. Ever.

jamie

Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:21:56 -0500

Huzzah! Suit up, kids: DC's favorite excuse for stitching together bad pants puns is back.

Jim

Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:18:02 -0500

does anyone know what appellate court this will be heard in? Should be the D.C. Court of Appeals, the "state" court. His case against the Chungs was in D.C. Superior Court.

Jamie R. Liu

Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:00:05 -0500

Can someone countersue him for being a drain on taxpayer dollars?

run_for_the_hills

Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:56:59 -0500

Taxation with Pants Representation

tenleytowner

Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:50:10 -0500

does anyone know what appellate court this will be heard in? is it the Court of Federal Claims?

julia

Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:50:08 -0500

So he sued for $54 million for a pair of missing pants, but only $1 million for wrongful termination? At least he has his priorities straight.

KrazyKat

Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:49:15 -0500

Someone's nose has been up someone's butt sniffing their pants to come to this decision. This case needs to disappear, like the pants did.

monkeyrotica

Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:47:01 -0500

Christ, are the Chungs still even in the U.S.? I thought they were so ruined by this case they went back to Korea? Contributions to the "Send Roy Pearson to Junkpunchers and Lock Him in the Walk-in Freezer Fund" are being accepted via Paypal. Put me down for $54 million.

IMGoph

Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:40:17 -0500

can this guy just accidentally step in front of marion barry's car?

Andrew Wiseman

Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:35:25 -0500

Hopefully your play ends in a mental ward.

Big L

Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:34:44 -0500

Only in Amerierrr...D.C.

timtheviking2

Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:27:11 -0500

Yes!!!! Not without my Pants: the Musical may happen still. But this may require a fourth act.