December 23, 2008

No Teixeira for the Nats

2008_12_23_Teixeira.jpgAw, #%&@! Just when it seemed like the Lerners were going to spend some long term money for a great player by signing slugger Mark Teixeira, the Yankees swept in and signed him for $180 million over 8 years. Thanks a lot, agent Scott Boras.

The Nationals, who scored the third-fewest runs and homers in the Majors last season, sorely need a big bat, and first base would have been an ideal spot — Dmitri Young and Nick Johnson are both frequently injured, and neither were that amazing when healthy. Sure, Young won Comeback Player of the Year in 2007, but Johnson was basically a bust, missing all of the 2007 season and 130 games of the 2008 season. He's so fragile, they should call him the Faberge Egg. Teixeira, who was born in Annapolis and grew up in Severna Park, hit more than double the homers of the leading Nat last year (33 versus 14 for Lastings Milledge).

And it's not that the Nats didn't try to get Teixeira. After offering $160 million for 8 years, they supposedly upped their offer to about $180 million for 8. But alas, the deep pockets of the Yankees, who have committed more than $400 million in contracts in the last month, won out.

The Nationals have experimented with top players before, like when they had Alfonso Soriano for one year, but the long deal offered the 28-year-old Teixeira would have added to a decent young core of players, with Ryan Zimmerman, Lastings Milledge, and Elijah Dukes. Teixeira probably wouldn't have brought the Nats to the World Series, but hey, they might have broken .500. Maybe next year.

Email This Entry







Advertisement: DCist Continues Below!

Comments (8) [rss]

This would have been an absolute waste of resources. Take that money and pour it into the farm system (and a new GM), Mr. Kasten.

 

And the rich get richer...

 

Yeah, invest in some good young pitchers. The Nats were near the bottom in team ERA last season. Who cares if you have a player who hits a more HRs if you're still giving up 4 or 5 runs per game. Maybe he wins you an extra few games, but when you're 59-102, you need more than just a few more wins.

 

Speaking of pitchers, the Nats signed Daniel Cabrera, a player it took the O's 10 years to give up on. That's a start...right? Can't be any worse than he was for the O's....right?

 

Next stop: Adam Dunn.

 

Tex's salary would have nearly doubled the entire franchise payroll, but that doesn't matter, because until Bowden gets the axe, any amount spent is just throwing more money at the horrible, horrible problem of this ballclub. The excellent farm system inherited from Montreal has been neglected and gutted in a series of awful trades, and there's no amount of cash the Nats could have offered to land a star free agent of Teixeira's caliber.

 

"The excellent farm system inherited from Montreal"

Are you serious? That system was decimated before they even got here. The Expos were purposely tanking drafts because they didn't want to pay much to sign top players. They were shipping away prospect after prospect for 50 cents on the dollar (e.g. Grady Sizemore to the Indians).

The Nats farm building has been quite strong in the last couple years (since Kasten's arrival). It's just about the only thing the club has going for it. Best farm system combined records last summer, if I'm not mistaken. Lots of draft picks in 2009, including #1.

 

I don't even understand why the Nats were thinking about spending this absurd amount of money on a big bat. Like others have said, when you're the worst team in the league you need way more than just a few more runs per game.

I also think that Boras had no intention of sending his player to the Nats. But then suddenly teams started dropping out and the Yankees weren't interested, and Tex almost got screwed. Lucky for him, the Yankees returned to their old selves and overpaid for offense.

 
Post a comment (Comment Policy)