The U.S. Senate is set to debate legislation granting the District of Columbia a voting seat in the House of Representatives on Monday, with a vote predicted for Tuesday. That would pave the way for an expected vote to endorse the legislation in the House and, at long last, something approaching voting rights for District residents. Of course, opponents of the legislation have threatened a quick legal challenge, but interestingly, The Hill reported yesterday that it doesn't seem like anyone is stepping up to the plate. Lawsuits don't file themselves, and though there are many an opponent to the measure, neither think tanks nor advocacy groups seem to be too excited to pony up the expected $750,000 to $1 million for the legal bills. Even some of the legislation's most ardent foes on the Hill seem to want to find someone else to do the heavy lifting on this one. Supporters of the legislation, on the other hand, have already started crafting a defense. Recession -- the best thing to happen to D.C. voting rights in a generation? Maybe.

And Now, 10-20 Inches


so, do we need a full-on great depression II to get senate representation?
Depression? Recession? How about a combo - Repression.
I'm feeling repressed, in so many ways.
Help! Help! I'm being repressed!
There you go, bringing "class" into it again.
I'm sorry, but strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Maybe that's why DC doesn't have voting rights...is there a watery tart lobbing scimitars in Mayor Fenty's general direction?
Is the lady of the lake the same lady as the lady on the Land-O-Lakes box?
Don't forget to include Maria Schneider in Last Tango in Paris. "I can't believe it is butter."
Mmmmmm....Parkay.
Finger lickin' good!