This is the picture of a Town Hall Meeting on health-care reform hosted by D.C.'s non-voting delegate to the House of Representatives, Eleanor Holmes Norton. No offensive signs. No angry shouting. No vaguely racist mob clamoring to get inside.
At recent health-care town halls hosted by other area congressmembers, like the one Rep. Jim Moran held last month, theatrics have been the order of the day. Far right-leaning protesters, suspicious of seemingly any Democratic policy agenda, have pushed these events to the front pages with their outrageous behavior.
But last night's "Fact Check Town Hall Meeting," limited to D.C. residents only, showed how much liberal, wonky Washington just doesn't have that much to argue about. Instead, approximately 250 District residents showed up to an auditorium at the U.S. Department of Commerce on Tuesday to pose thoughtful questions about the future of health-care in this country.
"We're the most civil people in the United States," Norton quipped as she kicked off the meeting.
(Apologies for the poor image quality, my camera was out of commission so I had to rely on my phone's camera).
Norton began with some brief remarks (after a roughly 15-minute delay), noting that she did not intend to make a speech. She said that more than 2,000 residents had sent letters and emails to her office about the current health-care reform debate. Of those, she said that only nine expressed opposition to the concept of reform altogether, while fewer than 300 said they were in favor of reform but would prefer not to see a government-run public option. Later, Norton would mention that the most angry, negative messages she had received were from non-D.C. residents, who she speculated were organized by the "Tea Party people."
Three District residents who had been invited to the event were then given the microphone. Each had a story to tell about nightmarish experiences with the health-care system. Jennifer Abbott, a 26-year-old EMT trainee who suffers from asthma, talked about being on both ends of the decision to refuse treatment from paramedics for fear of the high cost, both as a patient and witnessing it as a medical professional. Joseph Cobb, a single father with diabetes, said he had to pay $1300 a month in insurance premiums to cover his family until he finally lost his job and could no longer afford it. And Rachel Newman, a sound technician who has alternated between being a freelance and full-time employee her entire career, has run the gamut between having great insurance to not having any, depending on her employment status.
Three expert panelists, Linda Blumberg of the Urban Institute, Elizabeth Carpenter from the New America Foundation, and Karen Pollitz from Georgetown University then fielded questions from the audience. Like nearly any event of this nature, there were a few questioners who displayed a real affection for the sounds of their own voices, but this q&a session was marked more by its substance than anything else. Questions ranged from how reform would affect Medicare, to whether enforcement of any proposed new rules would actually work, to whether people with pre-existing conditions would really have an easier time under reform. A couple questions also went outside the topic for the evening, including the current state of Walter Reed Army Medical Center and of D.C.’s free clinics.
Norton ultimately expressed the consensus view that a public option will not be included in the final version of the bill, noting that she would prefer to see it included.
"I believe [the bill] will fall far short of what it deserves to be," Norton said.
As the audience filed out of the auditorium at the end of the town hall, few expressed surprise that the District's version of this event never degraded to a shouting match.
"The most contentious thing that happened was probably the people complaining about needing to use the bathroom at the beginning," said Ward 6 resident Colin O'Brien, 33, referring to the event's late start combined with heavy security that blocked access to certain doors.

And Now, 10-20 Inches



No deathers? No birthers? No people wearing teabags!?
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOORING
I've never seen Norton's birth certificate. How do we know she wasn't born in Kenya?
The use of panelists seems uniquely Washinton. Most footage of town halls I've seen are usually just of a member of congress grandstanding for/against the bill on stage and pandering to his constituents' gripes. Having a panel seems nicely independent, though she might ought to have included someone from AEI or Cato just to balance things out, but still give her props nonetheless.
Yeah, the panel thing has to change. So Politburo.
So people in Washington can have an intelligent conversation, but Marion Barry's a horrible person so thus DC doesn't deserve voting rights, yet every state in the union can have their own rogues gallery of douchebag politicians AND be cursed with a plague of mouth-breathing angry mobs at their town halls, but have voting rights?
Also, I am sorry that sentence was so long.
And EHN has slightly more power than anyone reading this post does...great that she is here to answer questions and concerns but considering DC's Medicaid eligible population is rather high as compared to most CDs...how much of this "really" matters? Please do not attack me for saying this just curious.
What about the children?
SCHIP
Well let's put it this way, DC is a primarily black city. Have you seen many black tea baggers? No? Well that's funny isn't it--makes me think that in his recent commentary on CNN.com, former president Jimmy Carter was right on the mark--most of the tea bagging hatred of Obama is simply racist tensions bubbled up and veiled behind some pathetic 'big government' sob story. The movement is largely racially motivated, as indicative by the fact that most of their sigs have some kind of knock toward Obama's heritage. I don't think you'd have a room full of DC blacks up there slamming Obama because he's black too! That and I'd like to think that while DC may have a lot of crime and poverty, that we still retain a high percentage of social progressives who are a little more forward-thinking than the average Joe Plumber-tea-bagging-douche from elsewhere.
Although in looking at the picture that crowed is suprisingly lop-sided in the white category ... *sigh* ... so I stand corrected in my post... let's just assume the lack of craziness was attributed to the mixed diversity in the DC progressive populace...
Looking at that picture, I think I can see maybe 7-10 people who appear to be white. Seems like the crowd is pretty racially representative of DC.
By which you mean not part of the United States. [/Colbert]
Um, don't forget the Lyndon Larouche crazies. It is hard to tell the difference, as the far-right protesters have embraced Lyndon Larouche looney-tactics, but in the name of accuracy and fairness, two separate kinds of extremists have been disrupting these meetings with lies and manipulated half-truths.