Tom already told you about Tim Craig's story in today's Washington Post, which outlines how D.C. Council Chair Vincent Gray used council stationery to solicit a $20,000 contribution from Comcast to help pay for Democratic Party activities at last year's national convention. But potentially even worse news for Gray also came today in the form of this story by Washington Times reporter Jeffrey Anderson, which alleges that some questionable work was performed on Gray's Hillcrest home by developer William C. Smith & Co. – a huge company that has a long list of contracts with the District government, and doesn't usually offer basic home repair services.
The allegations laid out by Anderson paint a sort of Ted Stevens-esque picture:
On Tuesday, Mr. Gray's office said that William C. Smith & Co. supervised and received a payment of $5,051.04 for work at Mr. Gray's home in July and August, including power-washing his driveway, painting his family room and installing wiring for a television. Mr. Gray said he paid the company an additional $5,000 for "architectural services for proposed renovation."
Mr. Gray confirmed that he did not pay for the work until this month -- after The Washington Times began asking employees of William C. Smith & Co. about the work, and a month after the paper filed a Freedom of Information Act request seeking permits on the property. He declined to show any invoices or receipts.
Could either or both of these stories end up hampering a potential run for mayor by Gray? It's too early to say, but it's starting to be the season when election-seekers need to announce their intentions or give up the ghost. Staring down the business end of the possibility of an ethics investigation could be enough to make any sitting politico think twice about putting themselves in the line of fire.

And Now, 10-20 Inches


Hampering a potential run for mayor? Are you effing kidding me? More like proving his bona fides for the office.
"William C. Smith & Co." is not listed as a licensed home improvement contractor on the list currently available from DCRA. It would seem that the Council Chairman accepted home improvement work from someone not licensed to do it in the first place. Doh!
If this company isn't licensed, how is it getting contracts to perform work for the DC government?
I think it was Aristophanes who once said, and I'm paraphrasing, "$h!t rolls uphill towards money."
Damn! The man is looking downright sexy in that picture. Does anyone know if he can dance?
"In an interview in his city hall office Monday, Mr. Gray at first denied that the company did any work for him, aside from arranging for an architect to design a renovation that he said has yet to commence." Classic!
At least Jim Graham pays for his employee's baby mama's abortions before the reporters start digging around.
Ah! That's nothing compared to the ongoing rein of terror that is the thoroughly corrupt Fenty Administration!!!
Fenty, after all, once let a friend drive his District-issued SUV for a few moments. *And* used the out-of-boundary process to get his kids into an out-of-boundary elementary school. Oh, and he rides his bicycle too often.
Let's leave Gray alone and concentrate on where the *real* corruption is!
Lets see he violated the law using an unlicensed contractor without pulling the proper permits from DCRA and paying way below DC market rates for services received from a group with lots of DC Housing Authority contracts. Sounds like corruption to me. He is the Chair of the City Council and contemplating a mayoral run. Somebody needs to check his deep freeze to see if he has bundles of cash in it.
mommyworks, you should check your sarcasm detector; I don't think it's plugged in today...
Got me. My mood yesterday was what one might describe as humorless.
who leaked all of this? sinclair skinner?