Quantcast

Bike For Your Life, D.C.

2011_0824_bike.jpg
Photo by ljstantondc.
After yesterday's earthquake, an acquaintance of mine quipped on Facebook, "If ever there's an emergency evacuation of Washington DC, everyone will die except those riding bikes."

Looking at the traffic that clogged area roads and the slow-going Metro soon after businesses and the government started sending their workers home, there's certainly some truth to that. In fact, for just about every major weather or security incident or emergency in recent memory, pretty much the only people that got home normally and somewhat quickly are those that rode bikes or walked.

Generally, bicycles have been seen more as a choice -- a politically divisive one at that -- than as a necessity in dealing with unpredictable urban living. But yesterday again proved that in times of trouble, jumping on two wheels may well be the best alternative that exists.

Capital Bikeshare, for example, tweeted this morning that it recorded 5,847 rides yesterday, an increase of 1,090 from the day before. Of those rides, 1,246 came between 2 and 4 p.m., compared to the 812 during that same timeframe on Monday. If you think about it, Capital Bikeshare's 1,121 bikes distributed at the 116 stations throughout the District and Arlington are now an integral part of any plan for mobility or evacuation in case of an emergency in the city.

Terry Bellamy, the director of the District's Department of Transportation, admitted to the Washington Business Journal's Mike Neibauer that, despite a lesser traffic nightmare than during winter snowstorms, the region just can't handle the massive traffic exodus that invariably follows an emergency. If you're in a car, you're probably screwed. On a bike, well, you might just well be lucky.

Of course, a bike isn't the save-all every time. I've ridden through most types of weather, but a good solid ice storm is just as dangerous on a bike as it is frustrating in a slow-moving car. (Bikeshare has closed during particularly iffy weather, anyhow.) And should there ever be a chemical or biological attack, well, open-air cycling won't be a particularly wise transit option. Additionally, while Capital Bikeshare is a great option in many emergency situations, bikes are single-person transit devices -- and as WashCycle pointed out yesterday, many downtown stations were quickly emptied out.

Regardless, situations like yesterday's earthquake show that while cycling can seem like a hobby or luxury to many, it can also be used as an important part of an integrated -- and yes, multi-modal -- evacuation or emergency response plan.

Plus, once the killer bears strike, I'm planning on out-riding those bastards.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@dcist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • I was splitting the lanes with my Vespa, and many were trying to stop my progress.  They get really mad when you simply go to the other side of them and move on.
  • guestymcspanky
    Is that legal on a scooter?  Not a loaded question, btw.  I'm asking because the law in D.C. does make an acceptation for bicycles. It is legal for scooters and motorcycles in California. At least with scooter, unlike with a bicycle, others will hear you.
  • Almost all Vespas are motorcycles and require a motorcycle endorsement on your license in DC. So not legal. Mopeds and electric bicycles (and that dude that attached a weed whacker engine to his rear gears that drives around on 11th and 12th NW in the morning) are bound by bicycle rules.

    On the other hand, I see people doing this quite regularly when I'm driving home on my bike or motorcycle and I am fairly jealous of their ballsy-ness. I do split lanes on my bicycle at stop lights to get to the front of the line before it turns green so I can get across the intersection before the turning traffic can have the chance to plow me over, but I spend alot of time sucking exhaust on my motorcycle.
  • Most likely not legal, but I don't care.  One of the main reasons I bought it, and not some bigger bike, was to not be impeded by traffic jams.

    I should add that I am talking about moving within stopped traffic. The drivers would steer towards the next lane and pull up a foot or so.
  • guestymcspanky
    Yeah, I've seen plenty of drivers do that.
  • Over the River
    I was home before, during, and after the quake. In case anyone was worried about me, OK?
  • standrightwalkleft
    FTW. I was dismissed from work at 2:30 yesterday and was home in 15 minutes. My bike just makes my commute so much more convenient.
  • if you put the winter spike tires on your bike with the carbide studs, it will ride just fine in the winter ice and snow, provided it can take wide tires with adequate clearance for slush.  An adult-size trike with winter stud tires is even better since you won't have to worrya about keeping balance.    If it's a thin dusting of snow with no ice and you only have slick road tires, you can put zip-ties around the tire between each spoke and get pretty decent traction.
  • Biking FTW!
  • b0tn0t
  • innwdc
    Guess I need to get a cat carrier that wheels behind my bike then.
  • b0tn0t
    Don't forget their helmet!

    http://24.media.tumblr.com/tum...
  • guestymcspanky
    That cat is really hurting cat bicycle riding modal share.  Scaredy Cat!
  • ms_jlynn
    That just gave me the best laugh I've had all day.
  • PutABirdOnIt
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

    NO EARTHQUAKE KITTAHS IN WARD 8!
  • guestymcspanky
    OH NOES. APOCALYPSE KITTAHS RIDES IN BASKETS!
    http://29.media.tumblr.com/tum...
  • ms_last_minute
    After yesterday's earthquake, an acquaintance of mine quipped on
    Facebook, "If ever there's an emergency evacuation of Washington DC,
    everyone will die except those riding bikes."


    Martin is Facebook friends with Guesty McJorterson?
  • guestymcspanky
    That's not my style, and I don't keep a Facebook account. Besides, I'm a strict rule follower. So while all the other cyclists would be filtering lanes and running lights to safety, I'd be obtusely taking the lane in queue behind the cars, insisting that I was operating a vehicle, and dying with the rest you schmucks.
  • Filtering, or splitting lanes is perfectly legal in DC!
  • Dread_Pirate_Roberts
    To a point, yes, but Title 18 has some pretty big exceptions that are subject to abuse. So be careful about tossing the "perfectly" monicker around.
  • guestymcspanky
    A) Show me the legal code, or at least show me how the legal code doesn't explicit prohibit splitting or filtering for all vehicles. I was under the impression that lane splitting was only legal in California.
    B) Being legal doesn't make it any less stupid.  YMMV
  • standrightwalkleft
    According to WABA it's DCMR Section 1201.3(b) and (c).

    "A person operating a bicycle may overtake and pass other vehicles on the left or right side, staying in the same lane as the overtaken vehicle, or changing to a different lane, or riding off the roadway, as necessary to pass with safety . . . if a lane is partially occupied by vehicles that are stopped, standing, or parked in that lane, a person operating a bicycle may ride in that or in the next adjacent lane used by vehicles proceeding in the same direction."

    Now, "passing with safety" is arguable. But lane splitting is legal in the District.
  • guestymcspanky
    "Perfectly safe" is perceptive, and no, it never makes you more visible.  Delivery trucks/cement truck/etc. turning right and crushing to death cyclists who have filtered to the front of the light still remains accountable for a very high percentage of cyclist fatalities.  That "perfectly safe" spot is in the trucks blind spot.  It still the best way to make you invisible
  • I am not by any stretch an "aggro-rider" but there are plenty of times when lane splitting is perfectly safe, and the best way to stay visible to cars and buses. Case in point, M Street in Georgetown during rush hour, when I can pass plenty of stopped/slowed cars, and not have to worry about them passing me back, because the rush hour traffic doesn't allow it.
  • Dread_Pirate_Roberts
    Good luck with that. It's legal as necessary to pass. That's not a license to cruise all the way down to the front of a lane of stopped cars. And the stopped/standing rule only applies when the lane is partially occupied, which is not always the case.
  • guestymcspanky
    Thanks! :) That is a moronic law.
  • alexalexalexalexalex
    "Being legal doesn't make it any less stupid" could also apply to not splitting lanes and waiting for an hour in traffic behind rows of cars.  Pretty much negates any reason for being on a bike (except telling people about your carbon offset).
  • guestymcspanky
    That's a very good question, which I think could best be answered by those people whom I've talked to who complained about getting doored in the middle of traffic:  people giving up on their cabs in the middle of stopped traffic.  Also, most filter and lane split on the right next to parked cars, where most people get out of cabs.
  • guestymcspanky
    Filtering and lane splitting is how people get doored.   Filtering and lane splitting is how cyclists appear out of nowhere unpredictably and get hit by motorists who don't see them.  Filtering and lane splitting, in conjunction with light jumping, is how cyclists end up passing the same cars over and over and over again, which of course forces the motorists to pass the same cyclist over and over and over again, which is the root cause of hostility and antagonism between the two modes.  Cycling benefits the cyclist in multiple ways that have absolutely nothing to do with getting from point A to point B slightly faster than in a car, and nothing to do with carbon offset either.  Personal expense, personal health, the endorphins make the non-aggro riders happier people, the convenience of not having to deal with parking is worth the couple of extra minutes of travel time as cycling is door to door, unlike urban driving.  For non-personal reasons the increased modal share makes communities safer, the increased modal share make communities more engaged and interactive, and increased modal share save the tax payers by reducing the damage to roads caused by higher motor vehicle share.  Also, a Washingtonian cyclist is not paying hundreds/thousands annually in gas taxes and vehicle registration fees to subsidize Maryland and Virginia commuters who are damaging the roads and aren't paying a dime.  None of that has anything to do with carbon offset.
  • why are people getting out of their cars when they are in traffic?
  • ms_last_minute
    Rat bastards!
  • My escape plan: bike along the towpath until I get to West Virginia and the secret zombie-proof government bunker.
  • adamsmorgan
    I'll stick to my feet. They got me home on Sept. 11 in 2001 and they got me home during the snow "situation" in January and they got me home yesterday and there was no fear of someone trying to steal my feet (and trust me, they DO NOT want my shoes).
  • DCTransplant
    Good luck on your feet when the zombies come!
  • CJ_Scudworth
    no fear of someone trying to steal my feet

    You must be new here.©
  • Jaynuze
    "bikes are single-person transit devices" I disagree
  • Dan_ator
    In a chemical or biological attack, I plan on riding while wearing one of these:

    http://totobobo.com/blog/what-...
  • Newhce
    Okay Martin, you go ahead and stay on your bicycle when the apocalypse comes.  I'll take my own ride.

    http://img510.imageshack.us/im...
  • guestymcspanky
  • Two more reasons DC needs right-to-carry laws: defending yourself against bikejackers, killer bears, and killer bear bikejackers. THREE reasons DC needs right-to-carry laws: bikejackers, killer bears, killer bear bikejackers, and right-to-carry advocates. FOUR reasons....
  • PutABirdOnIt
    Its true! I don't know one bikejacker, killer bear, or killer bear bikejacker who's afraid of a fake taser.
  • Foggy_Dew
    Trying to ride while packing heat can be a bit of a pain in the ass. Best bet is to go for a shoulder holster.
  • PutABirdOnIt
    Bike Gun Rack?
  • cheesenpeas
    I don't even own _A_ gun, let alone many guns that would necessitate a rack.
  • mirrorballdc
  • Damn, he is one good-looking man in that film.
  • guestymcspanky
    I'm no expert about carrying sidearms, but I think I'd want to carry a gun holstered in a tight fitting waist belt that rides a little high, like the police wear.  A shoulder holster would be floppy.  Also, people couldn't see it.  I'd much rather avoid conflict because I was visibly wearing a gun than have a dirty little secret that I'm hiding a gun to trick people into assaulting me.
  • Newhce
  • guestymcspanky
    Hozabout a gatling gun on the handlebars, right next to the cyclecomputer?
  • guestymcspanky
    Where else?  New York!  First tier armed post apocalypse city, FTW!
  • ms_last_minute
    Where the hell am I going to ride?
  • Foggy_Dew
    Hmmm, I'm thinking it'd be a bit difficult to get it out packing like that. Cops wear their guns like that so they can sit in a car...soldiers wear their's down low (thigh) or in a shoulder holster so they can get them out quick.
  • guestymcspanky
    Bicycle cops wear their guns high on their waist too.  I'd think a shoulder holster would slow down ones ability to draw, and on the thigh would be goddamn annoying while pedaling.
  • Newhce
  • Newhce
    I had never seen so many empty/full stations on the Cabi dock status map.
blog comments powered by Disqus

send a tip

tips@dcist.com
dcist official merch