In the District, it’s the owner of the football-team-that-shall-not-be-named that’s suing a local publication. But for the District’s northern-most urban neighbor, though, it’s an elected official that went after a journalist.

As promised, Dan Snyder refiled his lawsuit against the Washington City Paper inside the District yesterday. In an op-ed published Monday night, Snyder claimed that the suit would be “essentially the same.” Apparently, dropping the hedge fund which owns City Paper’s parent company and including City Paper columnist Dave McKenna as a defendant while burying previous claims that the paper was anti-Semitic and attacked his wife falls under Snyder’s definition of “the same.”

When the story first broke that Dan Snyder was considering taking legal action against the ownership of the Washington City Paper, there were a scattered few who wondered whether Snyder was pursuing the suit as some sort of perverse publicity stunt. It doesn’t make a whole lot of sense, I know. But, think about it: we have been talking a whole lot about Dan Snyder in the last couple of weeks — and a piece today by new WaPo sports columnist Jason Reid lends at least a little credence to the theory.

Neighborhood blogger U Street Girl acknowledged in a post late last night that she had removed a comment that had been posted to her blog after receiving an email from David Shott, the owner of planned new wine bar Du Vin Osteria. Shott had threatened legal action against the blog, according to its author.It is with regret that I write this post and removed the comment. I wish Mr. Shott had come to me…